clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Search for the Next MLB City, Part Three: "The Dependents"

In the second installment in the series, I looked at a group called "The Underdogs"--cities that had a slim hope of getting teams. In the third part of this series, I will look at a group called "The Dependents"--cities whose chances rely largely on one key variable.

If you buy something from an SB Nation link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement.

John Rieger-USA TODAY Sports

In the most recent installment of "Search for the Next MLB City" I looked at five metro areas called "The Underdogs": El Paso, Louisville (KY), Oklahoma City, Memphis, and Jacksonville. While these metro areas have a relatively unrealistic shot of ever playing host to a MLB franchise, they help provide a nice baseline for what the minimum threshold would be for placing a MLB team. This next tier, known as "The Dependents", probably have the population size and resources to host MLB franchises--as they are on par with Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Kansas City--but they each have one fatal flaw.

Dependent One: Las Vegas, Nevada

Key Facts: Population of 1.95 million, 40% population size of average MLB market, 89% GDP/capita (Gross Domestic Product/Capita)

One thing I want to make very clear: I do not think any professional sports team would ever succeed in Las Vegas. While it has a strong population size and produces a GDP on par with other cities being considered in this study, it is a tourist area. According to a study from the Economic Impact Series, Las Vegas employs nearly 30% of its people in the hospitality and leisure industry--along with nearly a quarter of its GDP. In fact, visitor spending accounts for nearly 30% of Las Vegas' GDP.

What this means for a baseball franchise is that there is no real stability. The influx of tourists is dependent on the U.S. Economy, and a team would be fighting for entertainment dollars in a city dominated by live shows and casinos. Without a consistent base of fans--despite the city's large population--a franchise wouldn't have a consistent stream of dollars.

Attendance Predictions:

Good Team: 31,904

Average Team: 29,333

Poor Team: 26,476

The financial questions don't stop here for Vegas, either. The real kicker is the scorching summer temperatures. For three straight months in the middle of the season, the average high is over 100 degrees, which means any owner would be forced to throw on an expensive retractable roof. Las Vegas just really doesn't make sense for a MLB team.

Dependent Two: The College Towns of Columbus, Ohio and Austin, Texas

Key Facts:

Columbus: Population of 1.90 million, 37.6% the size of the average MLB metro area, 95% GDP/Capita of average MLB city

Austin: Population of 1.72 million, 33.9% the size of the average MLB metro area, 96.9% GDP/Capita of average MLB city

These two metro areas come with two problems: University of Texas-Austin and "The" Ohio State University. See, these metro areas are fairly big college towns. College football is the way of the land, and it is something that is not going to change any time soon. While no professional team has dared to enter Austin, the NHL's Columbus Blue Jackets have tried and are failing miserably. These metro areas have fans that are more deeply rooted in other things, and they very likely not going to be good hosts for MLB teams. An MLB franchise's success here relies on the culture of the fans changing. Regardless, here are the attendance predictor numbers for Columbus and Austin.

Good Team: 31,896/31,863

Average Team: 29,325/29,292

Poor Team: 26,182/26,149

Dependent Three: Nashville, Tennessee

Key Facts: Population of 1.67 million, 33% the size of the average MLB city, and 93.6% GDP/Capita of average MLB city

If there is one city in this entire study that has a legitimate beef that it does not have a team, it's Nashville. The reason for that is that they are the home to the AAA team of a MLB franchise in a metro area that is smaller than the Nashville metro area. That city is Milwaukee, but don't be fooled into thinking that Nashville's claims are legitimate. Let's do comparison:

Population: 1.67 to 1.55 in favor of Nashville

GDP: 84.6 million to 80.9 million in favor of Milwaukee

GDP/Capita: 54.4 to 48.4 in favor of Milwaukee

College Grad rate: 35-44 to 25-34 in favor of Milwaukee

In this case, Nashville's claim to an MLB team depends on MLB's willingness to go to a metro area similar in size to its smallest market that doesn't share the same level of affluence. It seems doubtful that MLB would be willing to expand to a city that lies beyond its minimum threshold, which essentially eliminates Nashville as a candidate.

For what it is worth, when run through the attendance predictor, given the same number of average wins--which for Milwaukee has been 85--Nashville comes out with 20 more fans per season. This number would be more significant if Milwaukee hadn't already shown an incredible tendency to out-perform the predictor.

Dependent Four: Orlando, Florida

Key Facts: Population of 2.13 million, 42% size of average MLB metro area, 94.3% GDP/Capita

Orlando is cheating here, as it actually depends on two key variables. One of those variables has been mentioned before, and that's the fact that it's a city in Florida and Floridians don't show up to watch baseball. The second variable takes a minute to think about, but becomes pretty obvious: the Wonderful World of Disney.

Yes, an Orlando-based MLB team would be sitting right next to one of the best potential resources in the U.S. Disney Corporation is rather large, and they own a big chunk of the stuff you probably pay attention to: ESPN, ABC, Marvel Studios, Pixar, and their two successful theme parks. With the Walt Disney World Resort just a hop, skip, and a jump from downtown Orlando, a MLB franchise in Orlando would have to play with the ultimate double-edged sword.

The situation is also more complicated than you think. Would MLB let a franchise get heavily personally involved with a company that owns a company--ESPN-- that has a large broadcast contract with MLB? Partnering with Disney might be playing with fire--or it may just be impossible. That means competing against Disney in Disney's biggest back yard, which isn't a scenario that is going to attract any owner.

Due to this, it isn't much good to play with the attendance predictor. This is a variable that is too large to account for. With a partnership with Disney, an Orlando franchise could be wildly successful. If it were forced to compete against Disney--in a Florida market--the team wouldn't stand a chance.


These are five metro areas that all appear to work based on key numbers. They have sufficient populations, are plenty affluent, and exist as viable solutions on paper. However, they all face at least one key major flaw. In some cases, that flaw is being a college town. In others, it's the presence of tourist dollars. In another, it's the fact that MLB wouldn't be gaining anything by dipping below its own minimum threshold. "The Dependents" seem to work on paper, but they certainly don't appear to hold up when a closer look is taken.