clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Francisco Liriano and the Rare "Third Peak"

New, 1 comment

Francisco Liriano is good again ... for the third time. Very few have been able to rebound with such resiliency.

Jamie Sabau

If you’ve used the internet to read about baseball lately, you are likely aware that Francisco Liriano has been amazing this season, helping to anchor a Pittsburgh Pirates rotation that appears playoff bound.

Liriano’s numbers are absurd: 2.16 ERA, 2.65 FIP, 11-4 record, over a strikeout per inning and a groundball rate above 50 percent. It’s a story worth writing about, and one that many have tackled already.

First, BtBS’ own Alex Kienholz wondered if he could maintain his hot start:

While regression is almost expected, Liriano has shown in the past that he can be a dominant pitcher…if he can finish the year with 3-3.5 fWAR the Pirates should be extremely pleased.

Well, here we are at the onset of August and Liriano is at 2.2 fWAR (Fangraphs Wins Above Replacement), on pace for roughly 3.8 by season’s end when you account for his lost April.

That continued production inspired SI’s Jon Tayler to dive into the resurgence:

Liriano ditched the four-seamer, going with the sinker, slider and changeup as his main arsenal. Where the four-seamer used to be his go-to first pitch and two-strike pitch, especially against left-handers, he now uses the sinker to set batters up, then his slider (against left-handers) and changeup (against right-handers) to finish them.

That’s something that Bryan and I noticed on the BtBS Podcast a few weeks back as well, when we pointed out that in Liriano’s "good" years, his fastball usage has been much lower than in his "bad" years. Coincidence or not, he’s also had a significantly higher groundball rate in those seasons.

But those 250 words of preamble aren’t really what I’m interested in today. A lot of people have opined about Liriano’s improvements and whether or not they’re sustainable. Personally, I’m still taken aback by how a pitcher can yo-yo from being so good and so bad, seemingly over and over again. He's like Rocky Balboa on the mound, getting knocked around in an unholy fashion only to keep fighting back.

As a refresher, look at Liriano’s ERA, FIP and fWAR year by year:

Season Team GS IP K/9 BB/9 ERA FIP WAR
2005 Twins 4 23.2 12.55 2.66 5.7 3.32 0.6
2006 Twins 16 121 10.71 2.38 2.16 2.55 3.8
2008 Twins 14 76 7.93 3.79 3.91 3.87 1.5
2009 Twins 24 136.2 8.03 4.28 5.8 4.87 1
2010 Twins 31 191.2 9.44 2.72 3.62 2.66 5.8
2011 Twins 24 134.1 7.5 5.02 5.09 4.54 1
2012 2 Teams 28 156.2 9.59 5 5.34 4.34 1.5
2013 Pirates 15 95.2 9.41 3.48 2.16 2.65 2.2

Some ERA fluctuation can be explained by a lot of things – the reason we use defense-independent stats is because a lot of a pitcher’s end result is beyond his control or due to random variance. But FIP, which is meant to dig beneath the surface and suss out how a pitcher is performing independent of his teammates, shouldn’t fluctuate that wildly.

In fact, rarely do pitchers ever show that kind of FIP variance over their careers.

I pulled all pitcher seasons since 1994 (a 20-year sample) in which a starter threw at least 75 innings and sequenced their FIPs over time. I threw out anyone who hadn’t thrown at least five seasons in the span so we could see larger patterns, and then found the standard deviation of pitcher FIPs. (Note: I realize standard deviation isn’t the best measure since a straight mean of unequally weighted events isn’t a true mean, but it’s still going to get us to the same ending for this story.)

But I couldn’t just post the leaders here and call it a day. There are names who struggled and then "found it" and became very good. There are names like Pedro Martinez who had years of elite production and then a couple average years as they wrapped up their career. While those paths create large standard deviations, I’m much more interested in pitchers who fluctuated year-to-year rather than those who had a noticeable change or clear path.

Unfortunately, I don’t quite have the math chops to figure out how to quantify this, so I started perusing the list manually and cutting out pitchers who either started slowly or tailed off during the sample. Basically, I eyeballed for pitchers who were up and down by a significant margin (e.g. not like recent-years Cliff Lee, who went up and down but by fractions of an FIP point). Basically I was looking for multiple peaks and multiple valleys.

And it turns out that Liriano, as you may have expected, is a pretty unique case. The table below shows the examples I identified (minimum FIP standard deviation of 0.75) who had similar up-and-down paths. None are really that close, though, and the fact that Liriano has had three "peaks" remains rare. Chan Ho Park and Javier Vazquez might be comparable, though their peaks and valleys were noticeably longer.

Name earliest latest Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 Y11 Y12 Y13 Y14 SD
Cliff Lee 2004 2013 4.97 3.79 4.73 5.57 2.83 3.11 2.58 2.6 3.13 3.16 1.072
Steve Sparks 1995 2004 4.61 7.28 4.65 5.84 3.93 4.19 4.82 5.04 1.069
Francisco Liriano 2006 2013 2.81 3.87 4.87 2.66 4.55 4.36 2.65 0.960
Hideo Nomo 1995 2005 2.89 3.57 3.77 4.53 4.68 4.82 4.03 4.15 4.2 6.35 5.49 0.942
Oliver Perez 2002 2008 4.6 4.98 3.45 6.25 5.61 4.35 4.68 0.900
Kevin Appier 1994 2003 3.48 3.48 3.39 3.76 4.87 5.05 3.92 4.28 5.86 0.858
Jose Lima 1995 2005 4.76 4.09 3.76 6.12 5.65 4.67 5.35 5.71 0.831
John Danks 2007 2013 5.54 3.44 4.59 3.7 3.82 4.96 0.822
Javier Vazquez 1998 2011 5.19 4.44 3.68 3.21 3.68 3.31 4.78 4.06 3.84 3.8 3.74 2.77 5.72 3.57 0.800
Russ Ortiz 1998 2005 4.9 4.95 5.21 3.52 3.97 4.17 4.8 6.05 0.793
Jason Hammel 2009 2013 3.71 3.7 4.83 3.29 5.09 0.787
Chan Ho Park 1997 2006 4.22 3.82 5.18 4.23 3.85 5.04 6.16 4.22 4.86 0.760


It’s my hope that someone, either via the comments or email, will point me in the direction of a means of quantifying this up-and-down nature. For now, rest assured Liriano’s third career "resurgence" is something most pitchers don’t get around to, due to attrition or an inability to make adjustments or just aging. Of course, you have to be bad at times to qualify here, so Liriano’s somewhat historic position is a pyrrhic victory.

. . .

All statistics courtesy of Fangraphs.

Blake Murphy is a writer at Beyond The Box Score. You can follow him on Twitter at @Blake MurphyODC.

More on Pitching from Beyond the Box Score: