clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

How Common is a One-Win Above Replacement Player?

New, 44 comments


please expand by clicking the graphic.

Notes after the jump.


To answer the question posed in the title, some clarification is in order. "How common is a one-WAR player?" Well, if you're saying "exactly one" or "1.0," not very common. In fact, there are only TWELVE exactly-one-WAR players. It's my belief, though, that the question isn't really asking that and is instead attempting to find the commonality of a range of slightly-above average players.

To do just that, I grouped the data into sections which include every tenth's place after zero for the integer in question. There were 18 players between -2 and -1, 326 between -1 and 0, and so on. In case it's not explicit, each circle represents a single player at a single one-tenth iteration of a particular WAR. For example, the section at the top of the graphic which is listed }5 represents all players from 7.0 - 7.9* Wins Above Replacement (of which there are 5). Where there is a grouping of players on a single line (see the zero line), each has the same WAR.

Back to the question in the title. The better answer is, "38% (369) of all players in 2010 earned between zero and one WAR, while only 83 players (9%!) earned between one and two." Clearly and obviously, and I think the entire scope of the curve captures this well, players that earn greater than one WAR are increasingly rare.

Data sourced from Fangraphs, "all players" for 2010.

* Josh Hamilton's 8.0 was accidentally included in the 7.0-7.9 grouping. All other integer groupings start at x.0 and go to x.9.