Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

Bill James: David Ortiz Shift Doesn't Work

So I stumbled across the Bill James interview at Time (hat tip Tango) and found this nugget:

You use some colorful language in the book, making the reams of statistical information much more reader-friendly. At one point, you basically compare teams that use the shift against Boston Red Sox star David Ortiz to "Polocks hunting landmines." You say they're "dumb." Though you are quick to point out that there are only "three Polish guys" who are "offended by Polock jokes." Why push the envelope?

James: Everybody who is my age, or everybody who is over 30, knows that joke. I mean, I'm not sure I get the point of the over-shift against David Ortiz. It helps you if he hits a ground ball, but if the bomb goes off, you can put those infielders anywhere you want to, it doesn't really do you any good. The damage that David does comes when he hits the ball 380 feet. It really does not matter much where you put your infielders when that happens.

I have tremendous respect for James and his work, but this seems a little weak. What he's saying is by implementing the Ortiz shift the team is only aided if Ortiz hits a groundball, if he hits a homerun the shift does no good. Simply put that's common sense. Of course if Ortiz hits a homerun any defensive alignment is useless, but here's the thing; Ortiz only hits homeruns 16% of the time and he makes an out 62% of his at-bats, suggesting there is value in playing the shift.

This is a very small sample size, but take a look at Ortiz' 2007 hit chart at the Trop; nine groundouts, eight into the shift, one homerun. In 2006 he hit seven homers and hit into the shift eight times. Checking out Ortiz career Fenway numbers he's grounded out over 300 times, to the naked eye it appears to be split 60:40 if not more on groundballs hit to the right side. BR has Ortiz for 389 outs to the second baseman over his career, 313 to the first baseman, 183 to the shortstop, and 129 to third.

Does the shift prevent against Ortiz' homering? Of course not, and it's not the perfect solution to face Ortiz, however his balls in play data suggest  that if Ortiz is going to make an out it's going to be beneficial to play the shift.

Comment 1 comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

you should probably read the essay
before commenting on it. it seems a little weak to comment on something solely based on a time magazine interview. i expect a little more.

by larry on Mar 9, 2008 5:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Img_3830_small
BtBS Fantasy League
Small
Context Neutral Run and RBI projections
Small
Free Agent Compensation
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
Strike_three2_small
Effect of Foul Area on Strikeouts: AL 1954-68: Erratum
Small
Baseball on a stick
Small
Player Evaluating Statistic
Baseball_small
Rays Outfield: Cheap but Extremely Productive
Small
A new xBABIP
Small
Jack Morris "pitching to the score"

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Picture-6_small Chris St. John

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung