How do we balance rewarding the best teams and making the WBC exciting for fans?
The term "makeup" means a lot of things -- but is there a better way to define the mental aspect of a ballplayer's skillset?
WPA doesn't quite work as a tool to evaluate context-dependent performance. Do any other metrics provide a solution?
The Hall of Fame is not just for the best players. It's for the players we wish to honor and remember.
In this year's Hall of Fame voting, we see several players who are derided as "cheaters" for their use of performance-enhancing drugs. What makes a player a cheater?
I understand that there is no shortage of analysis on the fungible nature of relief pitchers or on the deep pockets of the Dodgers, so this might not quite be the explosive return to baseball...