Can Philip Humber Regain His 2011 Form?

Jim Cowsert-US PRESSWIRE

Besides throwing a no-hitter and having a career-best 3 WAR season in 2011, Philip Humber has been a replacement-level pitcher in his career. Is there any hope for him as we look to the 2013 season?

Philip Humber isn't exactly a name that people were thinking of when it came to pitchers this off-season. But that didn't stop the Houston Astros from picking him up after the White Sox put him on waivers, while avoiding arbitration by signing him to a one year contract.

Humber's 2012 season was one to forget. His career-worst 9.5 BB% and 16.5 HR/FB% led to a 6.44 ERA and a 5.77 FIP.

Humber throws a sinker, four-seam fastball, slider, change-up and curveball and since he struggled so severely in 2012, I checked to see if any of those pitches changed significantly from 2011.

Humber

The first thing that sticks out is that Humber had a lot of success at inducing groundballs with his slider, curveball, and change-up during the 2011 season. His curve was his best pitch, getting groundballs 66% of the time, while his change-up was getting groundballs 54% of the time. To put that into perspective, that was the sixth best groundball percentage while throwing a curveball in 2011 according to Baseball Prospectus.

In 2012, however, Humber's curveball struggled at generating groundballs.

He induced grounders just 46% of the time, which put him at 82nd overall on the season. That's a pretty big difference.

For some reason Humber stopped throwing his sinker during the 2012 season. When he threw the sinker in 2011 it only generated groundballs 37% of the time. Overall his sinker's GB% ranked toward the bottom for all qualified pitchers, according to Baseball Prospectus.

Humberwhiff

His slider didn't see any significant impacts in terms of whiff/swing%, in fact in only increased by roughly 1%. His curveball and change-up saw their whiff/swing% drop by almost 3%. Overall I'm not quite sure how significant that drop is though.

Even though Humber's whiff/swing% with his slider wasn't affected that much, he still had problems with his GB%, so I wanted to see if I could get to the bottom of it. Humber's change-up appeared to be getting a lot more horizontal movement, while some of his sliders were showing significantly less vertical movement.

7M4rke on Make A Gif, Animated Gifs

First, I'd like to say that some of those pitches from 2012 are misclassified, and my best guess is that they are actually two-seam fastballs (according to Texas Leaguers, that is. Besides seeing a two-seamer on Texas Leaguers, I didn't think he threw one).

Like I stated earlier, in 2012 it appears that he had less vertical movement on a good chunk of sliders, compared to his 2011 season. As a result, it got hit around a lot more in 2012 than 2011, particularly in the power department. When he threw his slider in 2011 he had an opposing ISO of .097, but in 2012 the opposing ISO was .244.

I also took a look at Humber's curveball, to see if there were any similar results.

T_EdRw on Make A Gif, Animated Gifs

In 2012 Humber's curveball was clustered as tightly together. If we look at his horizontal and vertical numbers we can see that vertically he didn't see a change at all. For those that are wondering, here are the numbers:

In 2011 his curve was +6.18 HOR and -4.91 VER. For 2012 it was +5.86 HOR and -4.92 VER. There were a good number of pitches that weren't in the cluster though, and he did get knocked around a little as a result.

In 2012 his ISO when throwing his curve was .135, compared to .076 in 2011. I'm not sure what league-average ISO numbers are for specific pitches, but keep in mind a .150 ISO is considered average. He essentially declined across the board in every category.

Finally, the last pitch that I will look at is his change-up.

dG_HNg on Make A Gif, Animated Gifs

From the following graphic it's pretty obvious to see that Humber struggled mightily with his horizontal movement during the 2012 campaign. His vertical movement went from +4.96 to +4.54, but his horizontal movement went from -5.39 to -7.

Batters actually hit for less power, their ISO went from .1 to .067, but they got on-base at a much higher clip. Opposing OBP went from .263 to .406. Overall he went preventing runs 34% better than average to giving up runs 43% worse than average. Not exactly the trend that you want to see.

Season O-Swing% Z-Swing% Swing% O-Contact% Z-Contact% Contact% Zone%
2011 27.40% 61.80% 46.00% 57.00% 88.50% 79.90% 54.10%
2012 24.30% 61.60% 43.60% 60.20% 89.20% 81.40% 51.90%

If we take a look at his plate discipline profile we can see that batters swung out of the zone 3% less in 2012, but interestingly they made contact 3% more of the time. His overall zone percentage saw over a 2% decrease, and given the struggle he had with some of his pitches that doesn't come as a surprise.

Philip Humber is definitely an interesting case as we make our way to Spring Training 2013. He faced some struggles in 2012, but it seems like some of the struggles could be fixed. I don't know if he's a 3 WAR pitcher, but he could easily be a 2 WAR pitcher, which is still a good piece to have, especially considering Houston's current state.

Thanks to Texas Leaguers, FanGraphs, and Brooks Baseball for the data used in this analysis.

Feel free to follow me on Twitter.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Beyond the Box Score

You must be a member of Beyond the Box Score to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Beyond the Box Score. You should read them.

Join Beyond the Box Score

You must be a member of Beyond the Box Score to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Beyond the Box Score. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker