Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Who Should You Root for in the Playoffs?

October is the best time to be a baseball fan. Over the next few weeks, we'll be treated to virtually nonstop (depending on how long the series go) nationally televised games between the best teams in baseball. Even if your favorite team has been out of the pennant race since May, it's easy to get sucked into the postseason drama (I'm an Indians fan, so this is a subject on which I can speak with authority).

But for myself and fans of the other 21 non-qualifying teams (welcome to the club, Red Sox and Braves fans), the beginning of the postseason presents a dilemma: who should we root for?

There are plenty of factors that go into this essential decision: a good story, likable players, a despised opponent. What's more, the odds of your temporary favorite team being eliminated before the end are 75 percent, so over the course of the postseason you'll likely end up cheering for at least two different teams about whom you couldn't have cared less about during the regular season.

Sound daunting? Well, fear no more: Introducing ROOT (Rootability Of Other Teams), a new tchotchke statistic that will make your choice much easier. ROOT ranks each playoff team's appeal to other franchises' fans based on the compellingness of their stories and how fun they are to watch, then adjusts the scores for each individual fanbase. The result: you, the viewer, know exactly where your loyalties should lie throughout the postseason.

Star-divide

We'll begin by calculating the basic ROOT scores—i.e., who a fan with no team affiliation should pick as his or her temporary favorite. I've identified four factors that can contribute to teams' scores here: being preseason underdogs, making a late-season comeback, being fun to watch, and not being a franchise that people generally don't like. Here's the calculation:

  • Add half a point for each game away from the playoffs the team finished last year
  • Add one point for each game out of the playoffs the team was on September 1
  • Add the team's NERD score (as calculated by the incomparable Carson Cistulli)
  • Subtract five points if the team is the Red Sox
  • Subtract 10 points if the team is the Yankees

And so, the team-neutral ROOT results for this year's playoff teams are:

  1. Arizona Diamondbacks: 22.5
  2. Tampa Bay Rays: 15.5
  3. Milwaukee Brewers: 15.0
  4. St. Louis Cardinals: 13.0
  5. Texas Rangers: 9.0
  6. Detroit Tigers: 8.5
  7. Philadelphia Phillies: 3.0
  8. New York Yankees: 0.0

There are a couple teams I might switch around if I were just doing this off the top of my head, but overall I'd say this looks about right. So if you don't have a strong team affiliation, you should be pulling for the Diamondbacks to best the Rays in the Fall Classic. One group of people who would hate to see that happen: TV executives.

Of course, for the majority of fans, this doesn't do any good. Most baseball followers aren't neutral bystanders—they're diehard supporters of their hometown teams (at least, when they're winning). Hence, we can adjust these ROOT numbers based for each fanbase based on rivalries and the presence of former players.

First, identify each player on a playoff roster who used to play for your favorite team—we'll use my Indians as our example—and categorize each as either a fan favorite (Victor Martinez fits here); a good, well-liked, or memorable player who wasn't quite a franchise icon (Cliff Lee); a role player, someone who wasn't particularly well liked, or a guy who some fans might not even remember (Ben Francisco, Jhonny Peralta, and Aaron Laffey, respectively); or an absolute bridge-burner (Mr. Revisionist History, CC Sabathia). Then, for each of the eight playoff teams:

  • Add 10 points for each former fan favorite, plus an additional five points for each one who has never won a World Series
  • Add five points for each well-liked non-face-of-the-franchise guy, plus an additional two points for each one who has never won a World Series
  • Add one point for each role, unpopular, or forgettable player
  • Subtract ten points for each bridge-burner, minus an additional five points for each World Series he has won since leaving your team
  • Subtract five points if the team finished between 5.5 and 10 games ahead of your favorite team for a playoff spot
  • Subtract 10 points if the team finished between 2.5 and five games ahead of yours for a playoff spot
  • Subtract 15 points if the team finished two or fewer games ahead of yours for a playoff spot
  • Subtract 10 points if the team and yours have a minor rivalry
  • Subtract 50 points if the team and yours have a major rivalry

Because the player categories are subjective there's no single right way to calculate the ROOT scores, and every fan's could be different. That being said, I think this is how most of my fellow Tribe fans would do it:

  1. Diamondbacks: 22.5
  2. Cardinals: 20.0
  3. Rays: 16.5
  4. Brewers: 15.0
  5. Tigers: 14.5
  6. Phillies: 9.0
  7. Rangers: 9.0
  8. Yankees: -7.0
I'd say this passes the feel test too. If you're wondering, Martinez, Lee, Bartolo Colon, and Jake Westbrook are the biggest postiive difference-makers here, though the goodwill from Colon is more than overshadowed by Sabathia.

I don't consider myself fully qualified to make definite judgments about how other fanbases view their former players, but in the interest of helping some fans who are now suddenly and unexpectedly teamless for the rest of the month, here's how the ROOT scores break down for Red Sox fans:
  1. Diamondbacks: 22.5
  2. Rangers: 18.0
  3. Brewers: 16.0
  4. Tigers: 15.5
  5. Cardinals: 13.0
  6. Phillies: 4.0
  7. Rays: -24.5
  8. Yankees: -55.0
and for Braves faithful:
  1. Diamondbacks: 25.5
  2. Rays: 19.5
  3. Brewers: 15.0
  4. Rangers: 10.0
  5. Tigers: 8.5
  6. Cardinals: 5.0
  7. Yankees: 2.0
  8. Phillies: -6.0
If you have a second-favorite team that made the playoffs or you have one player for whom you always cheer, then this is all completely useless. But if you're struggling to figure out what hat to wear now (probably a Diamondbacks cap, I guess), hopefully this will help.

Here's hoping for a great postseason!

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If you aren’t rooting for a Rays-Cardinals World Series, you may be dead inside.

by marv3mania on Sep 29, 2011 9:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Depsite the fact that they came out of nowhere to do it

The Cards are generally despised throughout the midwest (where I am) outside of Missouri, if not only for Tony La Russa, but also for Albert Pujols.

I’ll be pulling for the Rays in the AL but realize they dont have a chance.

by backtocali on Sep 29, 2011 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not to nitpick, but...

While the Cards are despised throughout the Great Lakes, they have a rather well-established following throughout the Great Plains thanks to years of being the only team out West anyone could root for (considering how awful the Browns were).

Some people do refer to the upper Plains as the Midwest. That’s all.

Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.

by J-Doug on Sep 29, 2011 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nitpicking the nitpick

I’ve never heard anyone in Cleveland express a strong opinion about the Cardinals either way.

Contributor @ Beyond the Box Score. Lead Blogger @ Wahoo Blues. Sophomore @ Brown University. Twitter: @LewsOnFirst
"Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona."—George Will

by Lewie Pollis on Sep 29, 2011 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Throughout perhaps a bit too absolute

I’ll say National League towns in Great Lakes states

Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.

by J-Doug on Sep 29, 2011 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not really, no

In the Rays’ case it was more about the Red Sox’ collapse than Tampa’s comeback, and the D’Backs had a pretty dramatic season too—it’s just that their underdog story didn’t come at the last minute.

So yeah, it’s possible that you’re dead inside, but that shouldn’t be the assumption for people who aren’t rooting for the Rays/Cards.

Contributor @ Beyond the Box Score. Lead Blogger @ Wahoo Blues. Sophomore @ Brown University. Twitter: @LewsOnFirst
"Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona."—George Will

by Lewie Pollis on Sep 29, 2011 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rays maybe, but why Cardinals?

Sure they’re this year’s NL underdog, but they won five years ago with the worst record for a champion ever.

I’m pulling for the Brew Crew in the NL, both for Milwaukee and Prince. If not for the Yanks in the AL I’d take the Rays.

Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.

by J-Doug on Sep 29, 2011 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're not dead inside, you've just sold your soul to the devil

West Wing time!

Toby: I just figured out who you were.
Kiefer: He’s gonna say Satan.
Toby: No, you’re the guy that runs into the 7-11 to get Satan a pack of cigarettes.

Contributor @ Beyond the Box Score. Lead Blogger @ Wahoo Blues. Sophomore @ Brown University. Twitter: @LewsOnFirst
"Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona."—George Will

by Lewie Pollis on Sep 29, 2011 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

You could say that about pretty much every episode through the reelect campaign

Contributor @ Beyond the Box Score. Lead Blogger @ Wahoo Blues. Sophomore @ Brown University. Twitter: @LewsOnFirst
"Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona."—George Will

by Lewie Pollis on Sep 29, 2011 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Posse Comitatus is my favorite in the run of the show

“In case you were wondering, ‘Crime, boy, I don’t know…’ was when I decided to kick your ass.”

Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.

by J-Doug on Sep 29, 2011 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Favorite scene, (probably) favorite episode

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FScv89J6rro

Closely followed by the Bartlet/Ritchie debate and when Bartlet calls the Butterball hotline.

Contributor @ Beyond the Box Score. Lead Blogger @ Wahoo Blues. Sophomore @ Brown University. Twitter: @LewsOnFirst
"Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona."—George Will

by Lewie Pollis on Sep 29, 2011 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Boooo!

Go Phillies!

by Chewy59 on Sep 30, 2011 3:06 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Sorry, Chewy

Love the Phightins but not this year.

Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.

by J-Doug on Sep 30, 2011 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, because the preposition isn't at the end of the sentence

I was taught that “who should you root for” is okay, as long as something comes after it. Am I wrong? Have I been living a lie my whole life?

Contributor @ Beyond the Box Score. Lead Blogger @ Wahoo Blues. Sophomore @ Brown University. Twitter: @LewsOnFirst
"Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona."—George Will

by Lewie Pollis on Sep 29, 2011 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was just kidding, but to get technical...

1. The preposition thing is a style issue, not a grammar issue, so it’s not wrong to end a sentence with a preposition, just frowned upon (less and less so) in certain circles.

2. If you’re not going to end sentences with prepositions, then you shouldn’t end clauses with them either (the first clause in your title being “Who Should You Root for.”

3. It should still be “whom,” but I don’t see many people using the indirect object form anymore.

4. I couldn’t really care less either way. To apocryphally quote Winston Churchill, “Prepositions are something up with which I will not put.”

Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.

by J-Doug on Sep 29, 2011 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well then

Also, I split an infinitive in a comment on Satchel’s article. Feel free to go to town on that :)

Contributor @ Beyond the Box Score. Lead Blogger @ Wahoo Blues. Sophomore @ Brown University. Twitter: @LewsOnFirst
"Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona."—George Will

by Lewie Pollis on Sep 29, 2011 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz