Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Making the Most of Their Hacks in 2011

Woba_per_swing_2011_medium
click to enlarge


Plate discipline is about more than just walks. It's also about knowing what pitches a hitter can handle and identifying those pitches during an at bat. A hitter with a high swing percentage isn't necessarily a bad hitter. It all depends on how much damage they do when they choose to swing.

To look at this I decided to calculate the Weighted On-base Average of all qualified hitters in 2011 per swing. wOBA here was calculated using 2010 coefficients and only includes batted balls--so singles, doubles, triples, and home runs. For each qualified hitter I calculated the number of swings and used that as the denominator for wOBA instead of plate appearances. 

The graphic above shows the top 25 hitters in baseball in terms of the wOBA generated per swing of the bat. For reference, league average so far this year is .155.

Amazingly, Jose Bautista is not at the top of this list. That honor goes to Troy Tulowitski, who continues to show how valuable and productive a player he is. Jose Reyes and Shane Victorino might surprise some people as the only other players with >=.200 wOBA/swing. Yes, most folks understand that these players are having great years, but they don't fit the profile of what most think about when they think of "bang for your buck" types of hitters (e.g. big, strong sluggers).

Star-divide

Some other surprises include the Rays' Casey Kotchman, whose managed a huge turnaround from a year ago when his BABIP was in the tank. His BABIP has swung pretty far in the other direction, and his wOBA/swing certainly reflects that.

Yunel Escobar's reemergence this year with the Blue Jays has led to a .192 wOBA/swing. He's decreased his swing percentage by roughly 5% and his doing even more damage than in the past when he finally takes the bat off his shoulder.

Who are the least efficient hitters with their swings?

Woba_per_swing_2011
click to enlarge


Adam Dunn (.087) and Gordon Beckham (.113) have combined for 808 plate appearances and over 1500 swings this season and have average roughly .100 wOBA/swing. With this lack of production, is it any wonder the White Sox scoring is 10% less than league average?

Nationals fans can't bee too happy, or surprised, to see Jayson Werth near the bottom of the list. Despite his massive contract he's only managing .133 wOBA/swing this season. Werth's swing percentage is pretty much right on his career average, so it isn't as if he's swinging at everything. Now, the quality of those swings is another story.

But wait a minute? Couldn't it just be that those that swing less have higher wOBA/swing? It's a good question. But a quick correlation between swing percentage and wOBA /swing shows only a -.30 relationship. That amounts to a .09 R2. So, sure, to some extent more disciplined hitters might be generally considered better hitters, but not in all cases.

Like I said at the outset, plate discipline is about more than just laying off pitches. It's about knowing what pitches you handle well and identifying those pitches equally well.

Comment 8 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great stuff, Bill

It’s surprising to me how many guys who walk a lot didn’t make the leaderboard—Santana, Swisher, Votto. Dunn’s fifth in the league in walk rate but at the bottom in wOBA/swing?

If you have the numbers handy, I’d be interested in seeing the correlation between BB% and wOBA/swing.

Contributor @ Beyond the Box Score. Lead Blogger @ Wahoo Blues. Sophomore @ Brown University. Twitter: @LewsOnFirst
"Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona."—George Will

by Lewie Pollis on Aug 16, 2011 9:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Thanks, Lewie

BB% and wOBA/swing shows a .14 correlation.

I think it illustrate an important nuance in terms of how we think about plate discipline. Yes, working pitchers is generally important, but equally as important is the extent to which hitters recognize pitches they handle and execute on those pitches versus taking pitches for the sake of, well, taking pitches.

Columnist at Beyond the Box Score. Contributor at Amazin' Avenue.

by Bill Petti on Aug 16, 2011 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Does a player get harmed by fouling off a pitch?

So if that were a skill – say, staying alive with two strikes by fighting off a pitch – that person would rate lower by this metric. Not criticizing, just wondering.

Kila's slash for Apr 20 to May 4, 2011, right before he was sent down: .276 / .344 / .448

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Aug 16, 2011 2:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes, you are absolutely right

I wanted to try and adjust for that, because I agree it’s a skill and strategic in many cases and not just random, but I can’t seem to find readily accessible foul ball data by player. If anyone wants to point me in the right direction, I am all ears.

Columnist at Beyond the Box Score. Contributor at Amazin' Avenue.

by Bill Petti on Aug 16, 2011 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm gonna be a dissenting voice here

I don’t see the value in wOBA per swing as opposed to wOBA per pitch faced (or just plain wOBA). What does it add to remove the results from when a player decides to take the pitch?

Writer at Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times
Pitchf/x enthusiast.

by garik16 on Aug 16, 2011 7:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Taking a pitch a swinging at a pitch are two different things

As I mentioned in the post, by isolating swings you might gain insight into a batter’s plate discipline that gets lost in the aggregate swing/take percentages.

For some batters the two (per pitch or swing) might be similar, for others there might be a large enough difference that it provides some additional information about a batter quality we didn’t already have.

Taking pitches and understanding the strike zone is one thing, but being able to consistently identify pitches that a batter handles well and then executing on those pitches consistently is another story, potentially. This is just one potential way of exploring if there is a noticeable difference.

Columnist at Beyond the Box Score. Contributor at Amazin' Avenue.

by Bill Petti on Aug 16, 2011 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz