Prince Fielder and David Ortiz: Old Dogs Learning New Tricks
Prince Fielder has a 2011 triple-slash stat line of .292 / .392 / .545 (.401 wOBA), through Friday. By comparison, his career line is .280 / .385 / .535 (.388 wOBA). David Ortiz is triple-slashing .319 / .389 / .588 (.422 wOBA), compared to his .288 / .386 / .573 line (.402 wOBA) since coming to Boston. Same old Prince and Papi, right?
Actually, no. This year's versions of these two veteran sluggers have taken much different routes to arrive at the same (well, slightly higher) production levels. Once you delve into their peripherals, you see some surprising things. Most surprising to me is that each has drastically cut down on his strikeouts. To wit:
- Ortiz struck out in 28.0% of his at-bats last year, and has fanned in 21.6% of his career at-bats. This year, his K rate is 11.8%.
- Fielder struck out 23.9% of the time last year, and has a career K rate of 22.1%. This year? He's down to 12.9%.
How can two of the most famous strikeout-prone sluggers have suddenly cut their K rate in half mid-career, all without affecting their overall production? Perhaps this graphic can help explain:
Pay special attention to the red zones, which indicate swings-and-misses. Analysis after the jump.
First off, it seems that pitchers have begun approaching these guys differently. They've been throwing 5% fewer pitches in the strike zone to each this season, compared to their career averages. Interestingly, this trend began last year for both players; Fielder's Zone% in 2010 was 39%, and Ortiz's was 42%. Both those numbers are far lower than their career rates of 45% and 48%, respectively, but this year's data proves that the dips weren't anomalies.
In 2010, however, neither Fielder nor Ortiz changed his approach. Their swing rates and contact rates were well within their career norms. Ortiz started swinging more often at pitches out of the zone, but that was the only change from previous seasons.
I would guess that both players realized they were being pitched differently, and sought to make changes in their batting style over the offseason. Specifically, it seems like they became determined to make better contact. This makes sense, if true; when you see fewer pitches to hit, it is all the more important to make contact on the ones that you do see.
Regardless of where this change has come from, the results are striking. Fielder has cut his swing-and-miss rate on pitches in the strike zone from 9.0% to 2.5%. He has hardly missed a hittable pitch all year. Fielder's whiff rate out of the zone has also dropped, from 12.2% to 9.6%. On all pitches, that's a drop from 10.7% to 6.7%. That may not sound like much, but in baseball, an extra 4% is huge (twice what the Rays got from their smartypants front office!).
Ortiz's story is similar. On pitches in the zone, his swing-and-miss rate has fallen from 9.8% to 8.1%. Out of the zone, the drop is from 9.6% to 5.8%. On all pitches, he's whiffed 3% less often (6.8% this year vs. 9.8% career).
You often hear hitters (and hitting coaches) preach increased contact rates, but rarely do you see such dramatic examples of this strategy being successfully applied. It is also strange to see it happen to two guys who have been around the league a few times, especially the 35-year-old Ortiz (Fielder is 27).
It should be very interesting to see what happens if/when pitchers start picking up on these new approaches, and what adjustments these two great hitters make in response.
7 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great stuff, Jacob.
Yes, my real name is actually Satchel.
I'm a columnist for Beyond the Box Score, an SB Nation blog.
Oh, I'm on Twitter, too.
Agreed, well done as usual.
I have a post on Tulowitzki tomorrow morning that looks at very similar issues. Although I come out on the other side, that the change for Tulo isn’t necessarily a good thing.
Columnist at Beyond the Box Score. Contributor at Amazin' Avenue.
That's an interesting point.
I look forward to reading that.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
I now twitter as @junkstats and blog about made-up stats and general baseball stuff at JunkStats.
by Jacob Peterson on Jun 5, 2011 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions
wow... u articulate a point better than most anyone i read....
with articles like this, your future is as bright as you want it to be.
Don’t worry about older women until you turn 22. It’s called the Saltalamacchia.
by bwellnjonesco on May 19, 2011 4:13 PM PDT
Yes.
They are unchanged: 46.5% in 2010, 46.3% this year.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
I now twitter as @junkstats and blog about made-up stats and general baseball stuff at JunkStats.
by Jacob Peterson on Jun 6, 2011 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions
misc regarding Fielder
Last year he got frustrated at the losing and general team situation and chased a lot of stuff that he hadn’t before – like eye high stuff. He seemed like he just didn’t want to be walked. I would take last year as a bit of an anomaly due to the situation.
This year he made a conscious effort to improve his opposite field hitting. He could always hit a HR on an outside pitch high enough but now he’s lining balls the other way which is a development.
One thing few note in evaluating him is that he plays virtually every inning. He isn’t skipped against tough LHers and pitching is planned around him in late innings. He sees every LOOGY.

by 



































