Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Economics of Baseball: Billy Beane's two step

One of the underlying themes of sabermetrics is the human struggle separate our emotions from our perception of reality. A player dropping a key pop-up that costs your team the game does not automatically make him a bad defender, no matter how angry you may be with him. A player coming through with a pinch-hit, walk-off grand slam doesn't mean he has some inherent clutch ability, no matter how elated you may be with him.

Emotions often obscure reality by bringing excruciatingly painful or blissfully positive memories to the forefront, whether the moment is repeatable or not. We are all prone to discarding the the overwhelming majority of the data when our emotions are involved, choosing instead to follow the skewed perception down the rabbit hole before realizing it is nothing more than an illusion. Human emotions are a very, very powerful thing, powerful enough to strip even the brightest of baseball men of their objectivity.

Star-divide

Take for instance the case of David Purcey. On April 11, 2011 the Toronto Blue Jays endured one of the more fantastic bullpen meltdowns in recent memory. After scoring seven times off of Felix Hernandez, the Jays led 7-0 heading into the bottom of the 7th inning. A Milton Bradley solo shot cut the score to 7-1 in the 7th before the wheels fell off in the 8th. David Purcey retired one of the four batters he faced, allowing two singles and a walk. Octavio Dotel faced two batters and walked them both, Marc Rzepczynski relieved Dotel and allowed both batters he faced to reach base (walk, 2-run single). Shawn Camp relieved Rzepczynski and induced a double-play grounder to end the inning, but the Mariners had scored 5 times and trailed by only one. After the Jays went 1-2-3 in the top of the 9th, Camp allowed a leadoff double to Michael Saunders to put the tying run at 2nd base. A Brendan Ryan sacrifice moved him 90 feet closer with 1 out but he couldn't come home on an Adam Kennedy groundout. Ichiro Suzuki was intentionally walked and stole 2nd to put the winning run in scoring position before Luis Rodriguez delivered a line-drive, 2-run single to win the game for Seattle. A heartbreaker for Toronto, indeed.

A bullpen meltdown may be the most frustrating type of loss in baseball. Not only should the game have been won (in this case, the Blue Jays had a 99.5% chance of winning heading into the bottom of the 7th), but the failure is systematic (four Blue Jays relievers combined to retire only two of the nine batters they faced in the 8th inning). The Blue Jays reacted to this ugly game by designating David Purcey for assignment. An action bred in frustration is an opportunity for another party; Billy Beane saw this and acquired Purcey for Danny Farquhar a week later.

A month went by, Purcey appeared in 9 games for the A's, posting a 2.13 ERA in 12 and 2/3 innings and limiting opponents to a .538 OPS. His peripherals suggested bad regression was on the horizon, but it's hard to say Purcey wasn't effective for the A's. He had re-built some of his former value. Then Beane struck again, this time shipping Purcey away for another player whose former team was making a frustration based move. Scott Sizemore, owner of a career .300/.388/.453 triple-slash in the minor leagues (.314/.396/.486 at AAA), had been given all of 237 major-league plate appearances to prove himself with Detroit's big club. He hit only .223/.306/.306 in those 237 PA's, but given his minor-league track record and affordability, Sizemore is a commodity that carries a lot more value than a 29 year old, hard-throwing, left-handed reliever without a reliable secondary offering.

Starting with Danny Farquhar, Billy Beane identified two players whom their organization had given up on for emotional--rather than objective--reasons and ended up with Scott Sizemore. That is basically why Beane is one of the best in the business. Regardless of how this trade turns (I expect it to end up looking very good for the A's), the process was unquestionably sound, and more times than not you'll win by doing what Beane did.

Comment 13 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Jays bailing on Purcey

The article sort of implies that the Jays impulsively jettisoned Purcey after that meltdown. No doubt that the meltdown was the catalyst, but really Purcey had had an awful ST and wasn’t getting any better. Purcey had a tremendous start to 2010 and ended up with a good year. However, the Jays took notice of his decline during the year and decided that he was unlikely to recapture his early 2010 performance in 2011 or later.

Because he was out of options and everyone else in the bullpen also did not have options (or was pitching too well to be sent down), the Jays decided to cut ties with him. So, the Jays DFA of Purcey was not quite as impulsive as implied by the article.

by siggian on May 31, 2011 11:22 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

If Beane's so smart

how come the A’s stink every year? Put it another way, how come there hasn’t been a book written about Michael Hill or Larry Beinfest?

"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." - Bear Bryant

by NJBammer on May 31, 2011 1:23 PM EDT reply actions  

They don't.

"The WAR folks like yunel apparently. i know this, bobby cox hated going to war with this guy." - Jon Heyman

Beyond the Box Score / MLB Daily Dish / Capitol Avenue Club / twitter: @CapitolAvenue

by PWHjort on May 31, 2011 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

They play in a 4 team division

and they had a good run for a while, but while I overstate the “Stink” part, they certainly haven’t done that well lately. I contend they got lucky with a few risks which paid off, and have struggled to live up to the Moneyball hype generated from their fantastic seasons. I contend they are just another small market team, which must have several things go right to have a great season. All the hype about how smart they are seriously short changes other front offices who also are very smart and hard working savvy people.

I got tired of the Beane hyperbole a few years ago, and tend to over-react when he’s mentioned. I wonder why other teams who have had their share of fantastic success don’t have their GMs similarly deified.

"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." - Bear Bryant

by NJBammer on May 31, 2011 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Look

If you want to fight the anti-Moneyball fight, that’s fine. I don’t give a crap. But this article has absolutely nothing to do with Moneyball, so I’d appreciate it if you did it somewhere else.

"The WAR folks like yunel apparently. i know this, bobby cox hated going to war with this guy." - Jon Heyman

Beyond the Box Score / MLB Daily Dish / Capitol Avenue Club / twitter: @CapitolAvenue

by PWHjort on May 31, 2011 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I don’t see why you so honor one GM for doing what every GM does, go after players other GMs have given up on for one reason or another. I don’t see the results. Maybe you have great reasons for thinking Beane is the greatest and smartest GM in history, but I don’t see it. I just assumed the book lead you into the saber world, given your reverance for him, and spoke accordingly.

"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." - Bear Bryant

by NJBammer on May 31, 2011 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t see why you so honor one GM for doing what every GM does, go after players other GMs have given up on for one reason or another. I don’t see the results. Maybe you have great reasons for thinking Beane is the greatest and smartest GM in history, but I don’t see it. I just assumed the book lead you into the saber world, given your reverance for him, and spoke accordingly.

"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." - Bear Bryant

by NJBammer on May 31, 2011 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

But you just wrote an emotion-based article

Do you see what you did? The Jays’ getting rid of Purcey was emotional, because he just had a bad outing. Of course, the A’s getting rid of Purcey was pure genius, because he had 9 good outings. But again, the Tigers acquiring Purcey was emotional, based on his 9 good outings, and Sizemore’s suckitude. The A’s acquiring Sizemore is pure genius, and when they launch him after a 6 game hitting streak, that too will be pure genius, and their trading partners will be acting on pure emotion. Unless it’s Jack Z. Then both moves will be pure genius.

In conclusion, you surmise this will all turn out good for the A’s, well, just because Billy Beane is a pure genius, and he is always right and good.

Why don’t we just agree that everything Billy Beane does will be a product of pure genius, and anything a non-SABR-stroking GM does will be an act of pure emotion.

I am so lucky to be alive during the time BaseBall Einstein is a GM.

sideways smiley face

by TasteeFreeze on May 31, 2011 1:50 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm not following you.

It will turn out good for the A’s because Sizemore is a way better player than Purcey.

"The WAR folks like yunel apparently. i know this, bobby cox hated going to war with this guy." - Jon Heyman

Beyond the Box Score / MLB Daily Dish / Capitol Avenue Club / twitter: @CapitolAvenue

by PWHjort on May 31, 2011 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand the notion that Sizemore has more upside than Purcey

or even Farquhar. But your article is about teams who act on emotion and not stats.

Seriously, with the team Anthopoulos is putting together up in Toronto, I think moving Purcey is a bad example of teams moving players out of emotional reaction to a bad outing.

I believe siggian (above) offers a reasonable read on the situation.

sideways smiley face

by TasteeFreeze on May 31, 2011 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

And you REALLY picked the wrong person

To pull the ’you’re just supporting this move because Billy Beane = sabermetrics’ card on. I think any of the other writers here will tell you I value the player-development side of running a franchise a great deal more than the data analytics side.

"The WAR folks like yunel apparently. i know this, bobby cox hated going to war with this guy." - Jon Heyman

Beyond the Box Score / MLB Daily Dish / Capitol Avenue Club / twitter: @CapitolAvenue

by PWHjort on May 31, 2011 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, a lot of people on this site are huge on scouting and player development

I love reading scouting reports more than practically any other kind of baseball writing.

Any proponent of sabermetric concepts that tries to undermine the value of scouting is off base- scouts will always be able to tell you things able a player that can’t be accurately captures by numbers. The best evaluations always utilize numbers and scouting reports in tandem.

Yes, my real name is actually Satchel.
I'm a columnist for Beyond the Box Score, an SB Nation blog.
Oh, I'm on Twitter, too.

by Satchel Price on May 31, 2011 3:27 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz