Why Can't Pitchers Deal with Jose Bautista by Throwing Outside and Giving Him Nothing to Pull?
Jose Bautista is ridiculous. He's clearly right now the best hitter in baseball. But what's curious about Bautista is that he's not mashing in a way that's particularly balanced....as you can see from the hit-tracker graph above, Bautista is a guy who basically always pulls the ball to left field when he gets the ball in the air (particularly on home runs).
So this raises the question: why do pitchers give him something to pull? Why not simply pitch Bautista away-away-away? Well, actually pitchers have been trying to do just that as Table 1 shows below:
| Year |
Average Pitch Horizontal | Rank Among Right-Handed Batters |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | +0.1811 | 43rd most-outside pitches on average |
| 2010 |
+0.2728 |
7th most-outside pitches on average |
| 2011 |
+0.3125 | 6th most-outside pitches on average |
Table 1: This Table shows the average horizontal location of pitches to Jose Bautista and how that compares to pitches faced by other right-handed batters. The right-most column shows how the average pitch location ranks in terms of the extent outside it is against Right-Handed Batter.
Table 1 makes it pretty clear that pitchers have been trying to simply pitch as far away as possible to Jose Bautista over the last two years - only a few (6 in 2010, 5 in 2011) batters have gotten a more extreme treatment, and not by TOO much.
However, this pitch strategy against Bautista...isn't doing much good.
Figure 1: A chart showing the effectiveness (using run values) of pitches against Jose Bautista based upon their horizontal location. The more positive the run value, the better a batter is doing on such pitches. The vertical lines illustrate the borders of a wide strike zone.
NOTE: When we say that these run values are compared against the "average", we're talking about the average result on a pitch in general, not the average at a particular location. So a pitch location where the batter's has "worse than average" run values does not mean that the batter is worse than average than the average batter on pitches in THAT LOCATION.
Figure 1 shows the effectiveness of pitches against Jose Bautista based upon the pitches' horizontal locations. In 2010, as you can see, pitchers could minimize the damage against Jose Bautista by pitching on the outside of the plate. Note that Bautista was still quite solid (See the note above) outside, with his performance on such pitches still being a good bit better than the average right-handed batter against pitches in this horizontal location. But this was clearly an area where pitchers could feel relatively safe against Bautista (as long as they didn't miss).
In 2011, however, this weakness of Bautista has essentially disappeared completely! And it's not just that Bautista's performance has been pretty good against outside pitches this year - it's been INCREDIBLE (better on average than any other place in the strike zone last year, in fact). In fact, Bautista's performance has been the best against pitches that are around 6 inches away from the middle of home plate.
What's happening here? Well, Bautista's still pulling the ball, even when it's away! Bautista has hit 6 of his 19 home runs on pitches that are roughly 6 inches away from the middle of home plate, and FIVE of those were pulled to left field (one was an opposite field home run). In essence - it appears that simply keeping the ball away from Bautista is not preventing him from pulling the ball in the air.
This does NOT mean that Bautista has no holes a pitcher could theoretically exploit.
See, Figure 1 is slightly misleading. See that little downward bump on the very outside edge of the plate (at around +0.75)? That's actually a point where Bautista has been slightly (key note on slightly) worse than average so far this year (admittedly on a small sample size of 81 pitches). However, if a pitcher aims for that spot and misses just 2 inches inside, Bautista HAMMERS the ball, even though such a pitch would still be clearly on the outside part of the plate. If the pitcher misses 2 inches away, Bautista simply has taken the pitch for a ball. Thus this hole's existence is not much comfort to a pitcher.*
*The Hole isn't obvious on the graph above because of the smoothing involved in plotting the lines for each year. Since the "hole" is between two "hot" spots, the smoothing reduces the hole to a mere dip in the path of the line.
In addition of course, the graph above doesn't look at the height of pitches faced by Bautista....while away pitches in general have been mainly still crushed (and pulled) by Bautista, for example, ones that are in the high part of the strike zone have given Bautista some minor problems. So once again, there are places where Bautista is beatable....but pitchers really really can't afford to miss.
BY THE WAY:
Figure 1 should also make obvious a key point about Bautista - or really any batter: simply walking him and pitching around him will do more harm than good. Note how the run values on pitches to Bautista - the most dangerous hitter in the majors, are still at their highest when pitches are out of the zone entirely. Despite how great he's been on pitches in the zone, it's still better on average to challenge Bautista then to avoid him entirely.
Conclusion:
Jose Bautista is pretty ridiculous, and this year he's simply on another level. He's managed somehow to take what would be his obvious weakness - pitches outside that are harder to pull - and make it into a strength...despite not really changing his batting strategy (he's STILL pulling nearly everything in the air).
Will he keep this up? Well that's another question....though I'd speculate the answer is no. It's hard to imagine that a batter of his type can simply mash and pull pitches so clearly away like they're inside instead of away. But he's done so through almost a third of the season, and if he can keep it up....well pitchers should be afraid. Very afraid.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great post.
Bautista’s performance this year tells me that pitchers need to change their approach to him. What they’re doing now clearly isn’t working. Because he seems to be able to pull all these outside pitches, perhaps he has moved up on the plate. If that is the case, then pitching him inside so as to back him off the plate would seem to be the wisest course of action. At least, that’s what Tom Glavine would do if he were still pitching.
"Yeah, and I have an enchanted jock strap." -- Karl Karlson
I now twitter as @junkstats and blog about made-up stats and general baseball stuff at JunkStats.
by Jacob Peterson on May 25, 2011 10:42 AM EDT reply actions
I concur
My first reaction to reading this is that when Bautista retooled his swing he must have moved closer to the plate as well. It seems apparent to me (through my armchair analysis) that he is someone who looks to extend his arms when he swings. Busting him inside could have the effect of either moving him off the plate or jamming him. At any rate pitchers should try it as they have nothing to lose since it really can’t turn out any worse than the approach they are currently taking.
Its funny, as a Phillies fan I can only seem to remember Glavine pitching outside, a little further outside, and even further outside. It always seemed like he would end up 6-8 inches off the plate and still be getting the strike call.
Check the second homerun he hit against Minny

Way inside and still goes over the fence, he can turn on a ball quick enough even inches inside.
Has anyone looked at this?
Tango created a walk chart for Bonds: http://www.tangotiger.net/walkbondschart.html
I imagine Bautista would be much less extreme, but it would be interesting.
by Chris St. John on May 25, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions
It depends on what you think his true talent is.
He’s currently hitting better than Bonds did in his best season ever (2002, by rate stats), if you use WRC+.
So, yeah, probably less extreme, but not a ton less I think.
Even with regression
I think his OBP stays more or less the same it is now (.492). Who knows where is SLG ends up being?
That Heyward guy is pretty good.
by another simpsons avatar on May 25, 2011 12:26 PM EDT reply actions
That's shocking to me
Particularly that in 2010 he did more damage on extreme outside pitches than inside. What’s the sample size on those? Is it simply a factor of a few big knocks on a small # of pitches?
Great stuff, Jeff.
Columnist at Beyond the Box Score. Contributor at Amazin' Avenue.
"Did More Damage" due to them being taken for balls.
This is not just pitches made contact with, but all results.
Also, I’m not Jeff :-P
Writer at Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times
Pitchf/x enthusiast.
Ha!
Sorry, for some reason I thought Jeff was working on something on Bautista. If it makes you feel any better, JD did the same thing last week with me and Justin.
Is there a way you can calculate it based on RAA per swing?
Columnist at Beyond the Box Score. Contributor at Amazin' Avenue.

by 
































