Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Visualizing AL East Starters: FIP through May 10th

Divisional wOBA and FIP Comparisons - April/May

NLE - Hitters | NLE - Pitchers | ALE - Hitters | ALE - Pitchers

5713974222_b7b95b0b11_b_medium

(Click to enlarge)

Continuing my early-look series by division of hitters and pitchers I present for you AL East starters ranked by FIP. The graphic includes those starters with >=30 innings pitched as of May 10th. 

The visual really puts into perspective what many have been surprised by--the effectiveness of the Yankee's starting pitching. Three of the Yankee's starters have FIPs above the AL average, and that includes Bartolo Colon. The amazing thing about Colon is that his xFIP is even lower than his actual (2.79--biggest difference in the division) due largely to his 7.2 K9-BB/9. As a result, the Yankees have the 4th best runs against in the AL. When you combine that with the 2nd most runs scored you get a comfortable .588 winning percentage.

Additionally, the Red Sox uneven start is reflected in the fact that while they've hit well (much better as of late), their starting pitching has absolutely killed them. Four of their five starters have FIPs below league average, and that includes the worst and third worst FIPs for the AL East. The good news is that Jon Lester and Clay Bucholtz should get better as the season progresses, given that both have FIPs substantially larger than their xFIPs (.76 and .44 respectively). But that still leaves them with the dual problem of John Lackey and Daisuke Matsuzaka.

Star-divide

The Rays boast two pitchers above AL average--James Shields and David Price.  The Rays' revival is due in no small part to their pitching (fewest runs allowed in the AL). Wade Davis has also put up a solid 4.03 and young Jeremy Hellickson has a 4.36. Davis' 2.9% HR/FB is largely responsible for his FIP, given he's only averaging 4.1 K/9 and 3.9 BB/9. If Hellickson can cut down on his walks (4.2/9) he should be in good shape going forward. 

Toronto's starting pitching has been pretty good, despite the fact that they've allowed 168 runs as a team. Two of Toronto's starters have above average FIPs (Reyes and Litsch) and Ricky Romero is just at league average (3.88). Kyle Drabek is in much the same boat as Hellickson--he's walking as much as he's striking out. But when you are striking out almost seven batters per nine, a modest decline in walks will pay huge dividends.

And finally, the Orioles. Not a lot to talk about here. All four of their starters with >=30 innings are below league average. As a team, they've given up the fifth most runs in the AL, and unfortunately they aren't hitting that well--hence the -30 run differential.

--------------

Data courtesy of FanGraphs

Comment 6 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Sorry to nitpick...

But your article says Wade Davis is at 4.03 and the graph shows 4.05 (Fangraphs says 4.06). The only reason I even noticed is because you have Big Dub as a Red Sock and Jon Lester as a Ray. That’s NOT a trade I’d be willing to make if I was the Rays!

by The Cleric on May 12, 2011 2:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Hold on...

Had to edit the graph and something got messed up—had it right the first time. Fixing…

Columnist at Beyond the Box Score. Occasional contributor at Amazin' Avenue.

by Bill Petti on May 12, 2011 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why FIP?

If you want performance, ERA is probably your choice, although obviously it includes the effects of defense too. If you want skill, then xFIP is probably your choice.

Jo-Jo Reyes is a guy for example who looks great on your graph based on FIP, but has a pretty lousy ERA and a pretty lousy xFIP so far this year.

It’s more of an observation than a complaint. Nice graphs, even if I wouldn’t have chosen FIP.

by Detroit Michael on May 12, 2011 4:27 PM EDT reply actions  

ERA is just to messy when it comes to individual evaluation

xFIP has it’s problems because it assumes a league-average HR/FB ratio, and we know that doesn’t reflect how a number of pitchers perform. Ideally, I would have worked in each pitcher’s career or three-year average HR/FB ratio, but it was just easier to go with actual FIP. I do try to note where applicable where a guy is benefiting from a really low HR/FB ratio.

For now I am going to finish the series with FIP, but may tinker with this as we get to mid-season when I’ll re-graph each division.

Columnist at Beyond the Box Score. Occasional contributor at Amazin' Avenue.

by Bill Petti on May 12, 2011 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz