Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

A Quantitative History of Retired Uniforms in Baseball

Frequency_medium

If it feels like teams are retiring numbers and uniforms more than they used to, that's because they are.

The chart above plots the total number of all players' uniforms* that teams have retired over time. Note that the trend continues even when the expansion era ends. Since 1970, MLB teams have retired player uniforms at a rate of one per team per every five years, although that trend looks like it might be letting up.

The dotted-red trend line represents a second value that includes the league-wide retirement of Jackie Robinson's #42. It does not count the number as being retired for a specific team until that team no longer has any players wearing #42.

Star-divide

Numbers that are retired twice are counted twice. Players whose uniforms are retired on multiple teams are counted multiple times. Uniforms without numbers are counted. The four Montreal Expos' numbers that the Washington Nationals refuse to acknowledge are not counted from 2005 onward. Bert Blyleven, who is slated to have his number retired by the Twins on July 16, 2011, is counted.

*The chart does not include managers, owners, announcers or other retired numbers, unless that manager happened to play for that team in the same number or uniform that was officially retired. This means that Billy Martin is included, but not Bob Uecker. This may seem arbitrary now, but the reason for this will become clear in future posts.

Source: Wikipedia

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Okay I found that Mariano Rivera still wears #42

But the graph seems to indicate that only 28 teams have the number retired. That leaves one team.

by TasteeFreeze on Mar 31, 2011 10:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Angels front office guy told me that MLB would NOT allow them to retire Tim Salmon’s number and wanted retired numbers to only be for players who made the Hall of Fame.

by Rev Halofan on Apr 1, 2011 1:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Nationals Acknowledging Numbers?

Looks like the Nats are recognising the numbers again: http://washington.nationals.mlb.com/was/history/retired_numbers.jsp

Wikipedia suggests it only just happened…

by Daniel Watkins on Apr 6, 2011 2:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Wow, thanks Dan.

I’ll have to look into this, and perhaps update my chart.

Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.

by J-Doug on Apr 6, 2011 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Could you chart this for each team?

Curious if the Mets are the least active in retiring numbers, having only 3 retired numbers aside from Robinson, and only one of them being a player.

by garik16 on Apr 6, 2011 3:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Hodges was a coach.

He player coached for two years (sort of) but he was retired because of his coaching, not because of his playing.

Not the same thing.

by garik16 on Apr 7, 2011 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Pardon, didn't player coach.

But he’s retired for coaching, not playing.

by garik16 on Apr 7, 2011 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz