Looking at History to Project Austin Jackson in 2011
While waiting to board a flight I saw the following tweet by Jon Heyman regarding the Detroit Tigers Austin Jackson:
fantasy thought: austin jackson looks fantastic in #tigers camp. could be primed for monster year
Of course, this got me thinking about what we should expect from Jackson this year. Unlike Heyman, I think Jackson has a huge hill to climb if he's going to have a "monster year"--history is not on his side.
The Detroit Tigers rookie had a solid debut in 2011, posting a 3.8 fWAR. More impressive, Jackson finished the season with a .396 batting average on balls in play. Jackson became one of only 40 players to post a >=.390 BABIP since 1901. His .396 average was good for a share of 33rd place all time in a single season.
What's interesting about Jackson's season was how unimpressive it was when you put it into context:
Of all players that posted a >=.390 BABIP, Jackson sported the lowest OPS (.745), lowest OBP (.345), and second lowest SLG (.400) all-time. His OPS was .41 points lower than his fellow Tiger, Ron LeFlore, who posted a .391 BABIP and a .786 OPS in 1976. Additionally, Jackson posted the 8th lowest ISO (.107) among the 40 other high BABIP players.
Given that a .396 BABIP is historically rare and the average BABIP is .300, Jackson will undoubtedly come back to earth in 2011. But given that we only have one year of major league data to go by, answering the question of "how much" is tricky.
I'm pretty confident that Jackson won't repeat his BABIP, given that only 25% of the players that posted a .390+ BABIP ever repeated the feat, and that list includes guys like Al Simmons, Rod Carew, George Sisler, and some guy named Ty Cobb. Even if Jackson is a high BABIP hitter, only eight players have managed career BABIP averages of over .350 (again, the list is quite impressive).
In fact, on average hitters that posted a .390+ BABIP saw their OBP drop by .033, their SLG drop by .044, and their OPS fall by .077 the following year. Only 13 hitters saw their OPS increase the following year, and only 9 batters posted a higher OBP.
Jackson was already starting with weak OBP/SLG/OPS numbers, so you have to wonder how he could possibly improve in 2011.
One possibility is that Jackson can improve on his dreadful BB/K ratio. Jackson struck out 170 times last year while only walking 47 times (.276 BB/K), which was 16th worst in the league last year (>=350 PA's). More balls in play will increase his OBP and SLG--even if his BABIP falls back to earth--and an increase in walks will also boost OBP.
Oustide of that, I'm finding it hard to see how Jackson has a better 2011. Bill James and Tango's Marcel both have Jackson posting a slightly higher wOBA next year (.344 and .341 vs. .333) as well as OBP and SLG, but I wonder how much of that is driven by their (high in my opinion ) projections of his BABIP (.383 and .377).
Coming off .396 in his first season, there is no precedent for a hitter posting a .370+ BABIP in season two. Just take a look at the highest BABIP average after a player's first two seasons--the highest you get is Wade Boggs at .368.
My back-of-the-envelope estimate is that Jackson will post a BABIP between .330
There's always a first time for everything, but nothing about Jackson suggests to me he'll be the first in this area.
9 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Historically high BABIP and a rather mediocre OPS?
Methinks Mr. Jackson will not only plummet back to Earth but keep on falling.
Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.
Couldn't agree more!
I’m pegging him at 1-2 WAR this year. Marcel is a very simple system – Just regression to the mean and weightings of previous years data. Marcel doesn’t “know” how insane that BABIP was, so it weights it more heavily than it should, because the model for regression to the mean (as I understand it) used in Marcel is super-simple.
And that’s fine – I’m not dissing on Marcel. It’s uber-simple and is working as designed. It’s just that its design doesn’t do well for players with 1 year of service time.
Totally
Even with a .350 BABIP last year I estimate his wOBA would have been between .300 and .310.
Unless he changes as a player (increases XBH, etc), I’d be concerned about his 2011.
Writer at Beyond the Box Score and tortured Mets fan (is there any other kind?)
His 2010 performance was obviously BABIP inflated
We can all agree with that. But I do expect him to improve. His plate discipline in game did not look like someone who should have a K/BB of 170/47. The fangraphs plate discipline breakdown has him right around average in all areas (swinging strike is a bit high at 0.9% above the average).
I also think he’ll develop a bit more power. His raw numbers may go down a bit with his BABIP coming to Earth, but I do believe Austin Jackson will be a quality player in 2011.
http://bullpenbanter.com/
Using the xBABIP calculator, I get an xBABIP last year of .355.
Converting that to wOBA using Matt’s weights for the 2010 season, I get essentially a BABIP-adjusted wOBA of .307 versus a non-adjusted wOBA of .330 (using Matt’s weights there, too).
That basically is about 12 runs worth of offense that drops off just by lowering his BABIP to a still very high .355. 1.2 wins off of his 3.8 puts him closer to a league-average player. God help if he has bad luck.
For what it’s worth, though: even if his offense slips, he’s still an elite-level defender. Watching him last year, I kept thinking “This is what Mariners fans must’ve felt like watching Frankie Gutz.” I’ll put his defensive talents up there with anyone in the game today – regardless of position.
Hell, having grown up a mild Braves fan too (because they were on TBS), I’d take a hard, long thought about how much better Andruw Jones was in his prime than Jackson. It’d honestly be closer than people realize, in my subjective opinion.
The other issues is, he's still young
My comment above hinted at this—who knows if the Jackson of 2011 is the same as 2010. He could change his hit distribution which would mitigate the drop in BABIP. When you only have a single data point it’s hard to predict with certainty.
He certainly isn’t doomed in terms of value, especially given his defense.
Writer at Beyond the Box Score and tortured Mets fan (is there any other kind?)
I'm not sure he can improve his hit distrobution, short of a huge surge in power.
He already had a 24% line drive rate (Collin Wyers, cover your ears! I’m talking batted ball data).
by Mike Rogers on Feb 21, 2011 11:02 PM EST up reply actions
He does seem to have great defense
I’m a Cardinals fan and honestly didn’t watch him, like, ever. But the stats are troubling. In 2010 he hit like a Skip Schumaker clone, and that’s with a gigantic, historic BABIP. Sure, he’ll probably improve, but the profile doesn’t exactly scream “elite hitter”. Probably could be a solid player, but seeing the television talking heads rave about Jackson was a little weird, I thought. I realize an elite-defending CF with average offense is very valuable, but what should we really expect from his hitting going forward?
Albert Pujols does not have "down" years. He has "~6 WAR" years.
He'll still be useful even with a regression
fWAR had him at 3.8 as an average defender, which all the other defensive projections disagreed with, putting him well above average. His BABIP regression may coincide with an increased UZR score, so he’ll probably get some runs back.

by 






























