Fun with Salaries and Marcel Projections: Cost Efficiencies of Free Agents
(Click here to enlarge)
Tom Tango's annual Marcel projections were released last week. As I was already thinking about the cost of runs for teams I thought I'd take a look at those positional free agent signings over the winter and how cost effective they might be based on Tango's projections.
The graphic above lists those positional free agents that have been signed (n=62) and what their projected cost per weighted runs created (wRC) is likely to be based on their 2011 Marcel projections*.
To understand who the biggest bargains might be is more complicated than simply looking at the top of the chart since 44% of the variation in $/wRC is explained by projected wRC. What might make more sense is to look at bargains within segments.
The sortable table below sorts players from least to most expensive in terms of projected wRC for each segment:
If we look at, for example, those players projected to create between 70 and 79.9 runs Hideki Matsui is the clear bargain at $54.54K per run created. Adrian Beltre is projected to create 77 runs next year at a cost of $207K per run created.
What's interesting is that there seems to be greater uncertainty--and room to capitalize on market ineffeciencies--among certain segments of players and I'll be doing a deeper dive on this topic next Tuesday.
------
*For multi-year deals I simply took the yearly average. In some cases, a player's 2011 salary will be more or less than the average for their contract.
3 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Of course, players like Beltre and Crawford aren't being paid just for their bats.
by The Ancient Mariner on Feb 11, 2011 12:34 PM EST reply actions
very true
Which is why I probably should have titled it offensive run creators. Not including defensive run values does skew things a bit, but unfortunately I didn’t have those handy.
Writer at Beyond the Box Score and tortured Mets fan (is there any other kind?)
by Bill Petti on Feb 11, 2011 12:47 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Great Graph
I am fairly new to this stuff (so I apologize if I am off-base, or too far out of context). As a result of lineup limitations (you cant just add 3, 1-run players to match a 3-run player) there is presumably an increasing marginal return for each additional run a player creates.
Your brackets take care of this issue, by separating the players into comparable groups, but has there been any work to determine the marginal value of each additional run?

by 


































