Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Fun with Salaries and Marcel Projections: Cost Efficiencies of Free Agents

5425761903_5151635724_b_medium

(Click here to enlarge)

Tom Tango's annual Marcel projections were released last week. As I was already thinking about the cost of runs for teams I thought I'd take a look at those positional free agent signings over the winter and how cost effective they might be based on Tango's projections.

The graphic above lists those positional free agents that have been signed (n=62) and what their projected cost per weighted runs created (wRC) is likely to be based on their 2011 Marcel projections*.  

To understand who the biggest bargains might be is more complicated than simply looking at the top of the chart since 44% of the variation in $/wRC is explained by projected wRC. What might make more sense is to look at bargains within segments.

Star-divide

The sortable table below sorts players from least to most expensive in terms of projected wRC for each segment:


If we look at, for example, those players projected to create between 70 and 79.9 runs Hideki Matsui is the clear bargain at $54.54K per run created. Adrian Beltre is projected to create 77 runs next year at a cost of $207K per run created.

What's interesting is that there seems to be greater uncertainty--and room to capitalize on market ineffeciencies--among certain segments of players and I'll be doing a deeper dive on this topic next Tuesday.

------

*For multi-year deals I simply took the yearly average. In some cases, a player's 2011 salary will be more or less than the average for their contract.

Comment 3 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

very true

Which is why I probably should have titled it offensive run creators. Not including defensive run values does skew things a bit, but unfortunately I didn’t have those handy.

Writer at Beyond the Box Score and tortured Mets fan (is there any other kind?)

by Bill Petti on Feb 11, 2011 12:47 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Great Graph

I am fairly new to this stuff (so I apologize if I am off-base, or too far out of context). As a result of lineup limitations (you cant just add 3, 1-run players to match a 3-run player) there is presumably an increasing marginal return for each additional run a player creates.
Your brackets take care of this issue, by separating the players into comparable groups, but has there been any work to determine the marginal value of each additional run?

by rif23 on Feb 11, 2011 3:47 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz