Hanson's Drop In Strikeouts

(Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)

Tommy Hanson had a successful second season in the big leagues last year, pitching 202 2/3 innings with a 3.33 ERA, 3.31 FIP, and 4.04 xFIP.  His contributions were good for 4.3 fWAR.  Throughout his minor league career, Hanson had been an extreme strikeout pitcher (10.7 K/9 in 389 innings); his 2010 rate of 7.68 was better than the league average, but was nothing particularly spectacular based on his minor league track record.  Looking more closely at his 2010 season, you can see that his ability to strike out hitters sharply declined by the end of the year.  The table below shows some splits for Hanson by month in 2010 (September stats include one October start):


ERA FIP xFIP K/9 BB/9 Whiff Rate GB Rate
April 2.17 2.94 3.50 10.24 3.10 .242 .417
May 5.09 4.15 4.69 7.90 3.31 .224 .356
June 6.31 2.84 3.77 9.12 2.81 .213 .432
July 2.43 2.47 3.46 9.71 1.82 .240 .482
August 3.05 4.07 4.64 5.17 2.35 .174 .413
September  1.81 3.03 3.89 5.84 1.81 .163 .489

At the end of the year, Hanson experienced a sharp drop in his strikeout rate; he remained effective due to improved control.  Taking a closer look at his pitches gives us a slightly better idea of what changed for Hanson last year.  His repertoire consists of a fastball, a slider, a curveball, and a changeup.  I'm calling his fastball a four-seamer for now, but there are probably some two-seamers as well.  Hanson threw a fastball or a slider last year nearly 85% of the time, so I'll focus primarily on those two of Hanson's offerings.  Splitting up Hanson's whiff rate by the two pitches gives us a bit more insight as to what happened:

 


FF Whiff Rate SL Whiff Rate
April .200 .250
May .160 .270
June .106 .391
July .175 .309
September .100 .313
October  .073 .290

While the slider became more effective from the start of the season, the fastball's whiff rate was half as high in August and September as it was in April and May.  So right there, you have some explanation for the decrease in strikeouts - Hanson became unable to rely on his fastball for garnering swings and misses.  But why?  A possible explanation is that Hanson lost velocity as the season went on:
Hanson_velocity_medium

The error bars represent one standard deviation. 

 

 

I saw no detectable difference in pitch location (fastballs higher in the zone tend to be harder to hit) or movement, so I think it's quite possible that the loss of velocity caused more contact.  One last think I'd like to see is whether or not Hanson's pitch selection with two strikes changed as it became harder for him to put hitters away with fastballs.  There was a very slight change:  

Hanson_pitch_selection_w_253atwo_strikes_medium


Month FF% with 2 strikes 
April .558
May .549
June .463
July .504
August  .488
September  .482



Basically, I can draw one conclusion from the data: a sharp increase in fastball contact, probably at least in part caused by decreased velocity, made it harder for Hanson to put hitters away, leading to more balls in play. 

 

The PITCHf/x data in this post are courtesy of Joe Lefkowitz's tool; other data are from Fangraphs.  Thanks to Peter Hjort for the idea for this post. 

In This Article

Topics
Players
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Beyond the Box Score

You must be a member of Beyond the Box Score to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Beyond the Box Score. You should read them.

Join Beyond the Box Score

You must be a member of Beyond the Box Score to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Beyond the Box Score. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker