WAR After Four
Now that the 2010 MLB Draft has come and gone and every fan has read up on their team's some 40 to 50 draft picks, with dreams of sugar plums dancing in their heads, perhaps it's time to provide a quick reminder of what a truly inexact science the MLB Draft is and, more importantly, how long the development of most of these players takes in terms of legitimately contributing at the MLB level. Obviously, this is not breaking any new ground despite the immediate MLB impact being felt in the nation's capital and in Cincinnati, where 2009 draftees are making significant contributions.
That being said, the success of Strasburg, Leake, and Storen ultimately represent exceptions to the rule that the seeds sown in a particular draft take between four and eight years to truly bear fruit at the MLB level. If it does take that long for a particular draft to truly be evaluated, what can we glean from the draft that would be on the short end of that four to eight year timeframe - the 2006 Draft?
While most people would look at how many 1st Round Picks have ascended to the Majors and see how those 30 players are performing, a better gauge, in terms of standing at the time of the draft, might be to look at the top 30 signing bonuses from the 2006 Draft to see how those players have adapted to life as a professional player.
Thus, here are the top 30 signing bonuses from the 2006 Draft, with the bonus, the placement of the pick, and the players career WAR to date (assuming they've ascended to MLB) listed:
2006 Draft
1. Tigers - Andrew Miller - $3,550,000 - #6 overall pick - Career WAR: -3.1
2. Royals - Luke Hochevar - $3,500,000 - #1 overall pick - Career WAR: -1.1
3. Rockies - Greg Reynolds - $3,250,000 - #2 overall pick - Career WAR: -1.4
4. Rays - Evan Longoria - $3,000,000 - #3 overall pick - Career WAR: 10.4
5. Diamondbacks - Max Scherzer - $3,000,000 - #11 overall pick - Career WAR: 2.3
6. Pirates - Brad Lincoln - $2,750,000 - #4 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
7. Mariners - Brandon Morrow - $2,400,000 - #5 overall pick - Career WAR: 1.9
8. Dodgers - Clayton Kershaw - $2,300,000 - #7 overall pick - Career WAR: 4.9
9. Yankees - Ian Kennedy - $2,250,000 - #21 overall pick - Career WAR: -0.4
10. Orioles - Billy Rowell - $2,100,000 - #9 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
11. Giants - Tim Lincecum - $2,025,000 - #10 overall pick - Career WAR: 15.0
12. Reds - Drew Stubbs - $2,000,000 - #8 overall pick - Career WAR: 1.7
13. Blue Jays - Travis Snider - $1,700,000 - #14 overall pick - Career WAR: 0.1
14. Nationals - Christopher Marrero - $1,625,000 - #15 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
15. Rangers - Kasey Kiker - $1,600,000 - #12 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
16. Padres - Matt Antonelli - $1,575,000 - #17 overall pick - Career WAR: -0.4
17. Brewers - Jeremy Jeffress - $1,550,000 - #16 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
18. Phillies - Kyle Drabek - $1,550,000 - #18 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
19. Red Sox - Daniel Bard - $1,550,000 - #28 overall pick - Career WAR: 0.5
20. Marlins - Brett Sinkbeil - $1,525,000 - #19 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
21. Twins - Chris Parmalee - $1,500,000 - #20 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
22. Cubs - Tyler Colvin - $1,475,000 - #13 overall pick - Career WAR: -0.2
23. Nationals - Colten Williems - $1,425,000 - #22 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
24. Astros - Maxwell Sapp - $1,400,000 - #23 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
25. Braves - Cody Johnson - $1,375,000 - #24 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
26. Angels - Hank Conger - $1,350,000 - #25 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
27. Dodgers - Bryan Morris - $1,325,000 - #26 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
28. Red Sox - Jason Place - $1,300,000 - #27 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
29. Cubs - Chris Huseby - $1,300,000 - #329 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A
30. Padres - Mat Latos - $1,250,000 - #333 overall pick - Career WAR: -0.5
Before getting into the teeth of which players from the 2006 Draft have reached, much less excelled, in MLB, take a look at some of those overslot signings, as well as some that fall below the top 30 bonuses. The big overslot money here came from the Yankees (Ian Kennedy getting the 9th highest bonus as the 21st pick) and the Red Sox (Daniel Bard getting the 19th highest bonus as the 28th pick). The only non-1st round pick bonuses that hit or exceeded the $1M mark (outside of Huseby and Latos) were from the Indians to Wes Hodges ($1,000,000 as the 69th pick), from the Rangers to Marcus Lemon ($1,000,000 as the 118th pick), from the Cubs to Jeff Samardzija ($1,000,000 as the 149th pick), and from the Yankees to Dellin Betances ($1,000,000 as the 254th pick).
Notable drastic overslot payments also went from the Red Sox to Lars Anderson ($825,000 as the 553rd pick), from the Braves to Cole Rohrbaugh ($625,000 as the 670th pick). Other late-round picks to receive substantial bonuses include Domonic Brown (Phillies - $200,000 as the 607th pick) and Derek Holland ( Rangers - $200,000 as the 748th pick).
But I digress...
Back to the performance of those players since they were selected, here's a chart that shows the players from the 2006 Draft, in descending order of Career WAR, with their draft position and signing bonus (if applicable) indicated:
Clicken to embiggen
What we're seeing here is the fact that 4 years after the 2006 Draft, 66 players have made it to MLB and of those 66, only 34 have achieved a positive career WAR. Certainly interesting to note is the fact that some of the lowest Career WAR's to date belong to the some of the very players (notably Miller, Hochevar and Reynolds) who received the largest signing bonuses. Of course, the fact that all have ascended to accumulate their Career WAR could be taken as a victory in and of itself.
The caveat that most young players struggle in their first extended stint in MLB obviously applies, but to see that 4 years after these players were drafted (with the signing bonuses meted out to them considered) is astounding. Four years later, how many elite players are there - 2 in Lincecum and Longoria with a gaggle of young, if still inconsistent pitchers (Kershaw, Justin Chamberlain, Bailey, Masterson, Anderson, Scherzer, etc.) still looking to establish themselves in MLB?
While this may be an unfair characterization, to judge young players on the merits of their first couple of months or years in MLB (Ian Kennedy's Career WAR of -0.4 is a good example of this), it serves as a startling reminder for every draft season. Every year, players are selected, picked apart and praised, then are exposed to the ultimate journey to MLB, where attrition is inevitable and where the wheat separates from the chaff to varying degrees and in varying windows of time.
The MLB Draft remains a crapshoot and as much as every draft brings optimism and projection with it, the stark reality of looking at where a draft class that just four years ago was explained in equally flowery terms is a sobering splash of water on many of the embers of excitement generated by a particular draft.
17 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Unless i'm completely missing or misreading something,
I believe Max Scherzer is worth a positive 2.3 wins, not a negative 2.3 wins according to baseball projection.
That's right. It's gotta be a typo,
because I had to delete Sherzer’s name when producing the chart. He’s the middle dot just above the two line and below Masterson.
See Data Differently. Beyond The Boxscore. | Follow me @justinbopp
Two Out Rally, the new BASEBALL MMORPG! | Facebook | Twitter
Yeah, that was a typo with a misplaced “-”.
by The DiaTriber on Jun 17, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions
This could be totally wrong
but while creating this chart, and even now, I notice what looks to be draft “clumps,” even after the top 40.
Can anybody confirm what I’m seeing and possibly explain it? Are there certain draft slots that start a run on better players (so they all go together), or is this a trick of the eye?
See Data Differently. Beyond The Boxscore. | Follow me @justinbopp
Two Out Rally, the new BASEBALL MMORPG! | Facebook | Twitter
If you're following along at home,
I’m looking at the 0 WAR line and from the left, counting 5 major clumps of players that have spent time in the biggs.
See Data Differently. Beyond The Boxscore. | Follow me @justinbopp
Two Out Rally, the new BASEBALL MMORPG! | Facebook | Twitter
Do those clumps have anything in common? If so, it's more convincing to me that they mean something.
Maybe the first one is just based on actual talent, or expectation (we drafted this guy high so he BETTER play in the majors, damnit).
Maybe one’s where teams are more willing to rush a guy or just see what he has, whereas a higher pick they would give more time in the minor to?
Maybe one’s where teams start to make different kinds of picks — low-upside bench players?
I think you're right--the first one is obvious.
The first clump are obviously (and hopefully) the best players in the draft and will be given the most chances to fail, which is why the concentration of negative WAR players thins out the further down the draft we go.
It’s the 2nd, 3rd, and 5th ‘clumps’ that have me intrigued.
See Data Differently. Beyond The Boxscore. | Follow me @justinbopp
Two Out Rally, the new BASEBALL MMORPG! | Facebook | Twitter
Clump Two
129 Astros Chris Johnson
148 Rangers Chris Davis
149 Cubs Jeff Samardzija
163 Red Sox Dustin Richardson
166 Cardinals Shane Robinson
171 Mariners Adam Moore
175 Orioles Jason Berken
176 Giants Ryan Rohlinger
188 Athletics Andrew Bailey
189 Astros Bud Norris
201 Mariners Doug Fister
See Data Differently. Beyond The Boxscore. | Follow me @justinbopp
Two Out Rally, the new BASEBALL MMORPG! | Facebook | Twitter
Clump Three
266 Giants Brian Bocock
…
273 Padres David Freese
…
284 Yankees Mark Melancon
…
294 Reds Josh Roenicke
…
298 Rangers Craig Gentry
…
305 Marlins Graham Taylor
…
310 Braves Kris Medlen
…
333 Padres Mat Latos
…
346 Cardinals P.J. Walters
See Data Differently. Beyond The Boxscore. | Follow me @justinbopp
Two Out Rally, the new BASEBALL MMORPG! | Facebook | Twitter
Is this possible?
Each team that drafts players usually draft players that will achieve around a 0 War. This could mean that most teams evaluate talent in a similar fashion, and that it will usually result in a 0 War.
It looks as though as each progressive round results in less players at 0 War (except clump #5) and this could be indicative of more talent already off the board at that point.
Given enough velocity even a pig will fly
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Jun 17, 2010 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions
To note
Sapp Retired – so you change change is N/A to something that accurately shows that he is out of baseball.
Come check out Bullpen Banter!
Follow Bullpen Banter on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter
Remember: baseball guys... baseball...
Where are these WAR values from?
If the values are from baseballprojection.com then anything done this season is missing.
What's the breakdown of HSers versus college players?
You wouldn’t expect a lot of high schoolers to have much time in the majors at this point.
by Dan Turkenkopf on Jun 18, 2010 10:29 AM EDT reply actions
You know, that's something I would like to know--
are there a lot of HSers drafted? I always figured it was like the NBA where maybe one or two per year were drafted and they were expected to be AROD.
See Data Differently. Beyond The Boxscore. | Follow me @justinbopp
Two Out Rally, the new BASEBALL MMORPG! | Facebook | Twitter
by Justin Bopp on Jun 18, 2010 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions
That would certainly be an interesting corollary as I debated about how far out to go (is 4 years enough time to evaluate these things), then decided that the crux of the piece was to show how even the 2010 draftees that move the fastest probably aren’t contributing much in 2014…with a few exceptions.
Here’s some data:
29 of the top 76 picks were from HS with Kershaw, Travis Snider, Chris Tillman, Brett Anderson, and Trevor Cahill being the 5 of the 29 HS picks taken in the first 76 picks making it to MLB.
For comparison’s sake, 47 of the top 76 were college players, with 26 of those 47 players making it to MLB four years after being drafted.
by The DiaTriber on Jun 18, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Certainly interesting to note is the fact that some of the lowest Career WAR’s to date belong to the some of the very players (notably Miller, Hochevar and Reynolds) who received the largest signing bonuses. Of course, the fact that all have ascended to accumulate their Career WAR could be taken as a victory in and of itself.
Miller and Hochevar were given major league contracts straight out of the draft, which has two main effects. First, it starts each player’s option clock ticking two or three years earlier than it might have otherwise. Second, if and when that stellar amateur prospect becomes a thriving major leaguer, it will cost that club a lot more money to pay him, even through his initial six-plus years of club control.
(For a glaring illustration of this second factor, compare Evan Longoria’s total compensation to Mark Teixeira’s, pre-free agency in both cases. Teixeria got an extra $17 million, even though Longoria will devote a seventh year to his club, and was drafted five years later, and is almost certainly going to turn out to be the better player. Why clubs ever submit to this outside of a guy like Strasburg is really beyond me.)
It’s the first factor that’s significant, though. The fast-ticking option clock, and the fairly senseless devotion of the 40-man roster spot, create artificial pressure on the club to advance the player quickly through the minor league levels and up to the majors. That probably is the main culprit in seeing negative WAR figures for some elite draftees — they’re simply in the majors sooner than they should be. It may or may not have a long-term effect on the player’s development and productivity. It’s hard to see how this could ever be a good thing for the club.
Of course, there are other artificial factors as well, such as the big-league club just having some massive talent hole at a particular position. I assume that’s what got Greg Reynolds to the majors prematurely, to achieve his negative WAR total.

by 


































