WAR After Four

Now that the MLB Draft is over, what fruit have the seeds of the 2006 draft borne in The Bigs?

Now that the 2010 MLB Draft has come and gone and every fan has read up on their team's some 40 to 50 draft picks, with dreams of sugar plums dancing in their heads, perhaps it's time to provide a quick reminder of what a truly inexact science the MLB Draft is and, more importantly, how long the development of most of these players takes in terms of legitimately contributing at the MLB level.  Obviously, this is not breaking any new ground despite the immediate MLB impact being felt in the nation's capital and in Cincinnati, where 2009 draftees are making significant contributions.

That being said, the success of Strasburg, Leake, and Storen ultimately represent exceptions to the rule that the seeds sown in a particular draft take between four and eight years to truly bear fruit at the MLB level.  If it does take that long for a particular draft to truly be evaluated, what can we glean from the draft that would be on the short end of that four to eight year timeframe - the 2006 Draft?

While most people would look at how many 1st Round Picks have ascended to the Majors and see how those 30 players are performing, a better gauge, in terms of standing at the time of the draft, might be to look at the top 30 signing bonuses from the 2006 Draft to see how those players have adapted to life as a professional player.

Thus, here are the top 30 signing bonuses from the 2006 Draft, with the bonus, the placement of the pick, and the players career WAR to date (assuming they've ascended to MLB) listed:

2006 Draft

1. Tigers - Andrew Miller - $3,550,000 - #6 overall pick - Career WAR: -3.1

2. Royals - Luke Hochevar - $3,500,000 - #1 overall pick - Career WAR: -1.1

3. Rockies - Greg Reynolds - $3,250,000 - #2 overall pick - Career WAR: -1.4

4. Rays - Evan Longoria - $3,000,000 - #3 overall pick - Career WAR: 10.4

5. Diamondbacks - Max Scherzer - $3,000,000 - #11 overall pick - Career WAR: 2.3

6. Pirates - Brad Lincoln - $2,750,000 - #4 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

7. Mariners - Brandon Morrow - $2,400,000 - #5 overall pick  - Career WAR: 1.9

8. Dodgers - Clayton Kershaw - $2,300,000 - #7 overall pick - Career WAR: 4.9

9. Yankees - Ian Kennedy - $2,250,000 - #21 overall pick - Career WAR: -0.4

10. Orioles - Billy Rowell - $2,100,000 - #9 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

11. Giants - Tim Lincecum - $2,025,000 - #10 overall pick - Career WAR: 15.0

12. Reds - Drew Stubbs - $2,000,000 - #8 overall pick - Career WAR: 1.7

13. Blue Jays - Travis Snider - $1,700,000 - #14 overall pick - Career WAR: 0.1

14. Nationals - Christopher Marrero - $1,625,000 - #15 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

15. Rangers - Kasey Kiker - $1,600,000 - #12 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

16. Padres - Matt Antonelli - $1,575,000 - #17 overall pick - Career WAR: -0.4

17. Brewers - Jeremy Jeffress - $1,550,000 - #16 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

18. Phillies - Kyle Drabek - $1,550,000 - #18 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

19. Red Sox - Daniel Bard - $1,550,000 - #28 overall pick - Career WAR: 0.5

20. Marlins - Brett Sinkbeil - $1,525,000 - #19 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

21. Twins - Chris Parmalee - $1,500,000 - #20 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

22. Cubs - Tyler Colvin - $1,475,000 - #13 overall pick - Career WAR: -0.2

23. Nationals - Colten Williems - $1,425,000 - #22 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

24. Astros - Maxwell Sapp - $1,400,000 - #23 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

25. Braves - Cody Johnson - $1,375,000 - #24 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

26. Angels - Hank Conger - $1,350,000 - #25 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

27. Dodgers - Bryan Morris - $1,325,000 - #26 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

28. Red Sox - Jason Place - $1,300,000 - #27 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

29. Cubs - Chris Huseby - $1,300,000 - #329 overall pick - Career WAR: N/A

30. Padres - Mat Latos - $1,250,000 - #333 overall pick - Career WAR: -0.5

Before getting into the teeth of which players from the 2006 Draft have reached, much less excelled, in MLB, take a look at some of those overslot signings, as well as some that fall below the top 30 bonuses.  The big overslot money here came from the Yankees (Ian Kennedy getting the 9th highest bonus as the 21st pick) and the Red Sox (Daniel Bard getting the 19th highest bonus as the 28th pick).  The only non-1st round pick bonuses that hit or exceeded the $1M mark (outside of Huseby and Latos) were from the Indians to Wes Hodges ($1,000,000 as the 69th pick), from the Rangers to  Marcus Lemon ($1,000,000 as the 118th pick), from the Cubs to Jeff Samardzija ($1,000,000 as the 149th pick), and from the Yankees to Dellin Betances ($1,000,000 as the 254th pick). 

Notable drastic overslot payments also went from the Red Sox to Lars Anderson ($825,000 as the 553rd pick), from the Braves to Cole Rohrbaugh ($625,000 as the 670th pick).  Other late-round picks to receive substantial bonuses include Domonic Brown (Phillies - $200,000 as the 607th pick) and Derek Holland ( Rangers - $200,000 as the 748th pick).

But I digress...

Back to the performance of those players since they were selected, here's a chart that shows the players from the 2006 Draft, in descending order of Career WAR, with their draft position and signing bonus (if applicable) indicated:

2006-draft-war-results_medium

Clicken to embiggen

 


What we're seeing here is the fact that 4 years after the 2006 Draft, 66 players have made it to MLB and of those 66, only 34 have achieved a positive career WAR.  Certainly interesting to note is the fact that some of the lowest Career WAR's to date belong to the some of the very players (notably Miller, Hochevar and Reynolds)  who received the largest signing bonuses.  Of course, the fact that all have ascended to accumulate their Career WAR could be taken as a victory in and of itself.   

The caveat that most young players struggle in their first extended stint in MLB obviously applies, but to see that 4 years after these players were drafted (with the signing bonuses meted out to them considered) is astounding.  Four years later, how many elite players are there - 2 in Lincecum and Longoria with a gaggle of young, if still inconsistent pitchers (Kershaw, Justin Chamberlain, Bailey, Masterson, Anderson, Scherzer, etc.) still looking to establish themselves in MLB?

While this may be an unfair characterization, to judge young players on the merits of their first couple of months or years in MLB (Ian Kennedy's Career WAR of -0.4 is a good example of this), it serves as a startling reminder for every draft season.  Every year, players are selected, picked apart and praised, then are exposed to the ultimate journey to MLB, where attrition is inevitable and where the wheat separates from the chaff to varying degrees and in varying windows of time.

The MLB Draft remains a crapshoot and as much as every draft brings optimism and projection with it, the stark reality of looking at where a draft class that just four years ago was explained in equally flowery terms is a sobering splash of water on many of the embers of excitement generated by a particular draft.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Beyond the Box Score

You must be a member of Beyond the Box Score to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Beyond the Box Score. You should read them.

Join Beyond the Box Score

You must be a member of Beyond the Box Score to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Beyond the Box Score. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker