Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

Base Running: Which Teams Help (or Hurt) Themselves the Most?

Graph of the Day

Baserunning-thumb-june2010_medium

EQBRR, per Baseball Prospectus

Equivalent Base Running Runs. Measures the number of runs contributed by a player's advancement on the bases, above what would be expected based on the number and quality of the baserunning opportunities with which the player is presented, park-adjusted and based on a multi-year run expectancy table.

EqBRR is calculated as the sum of various baserunning components: Equivalent Ground Advancement Runs (EqGAR), Equivalent Stolen Base Runs (EqSBR), Equivalent Air Advancement Runs (EqAAR), Equivalent Hit Advancement Runs (EqHAR) and Equivalent Other Advancement Runs (EqOAR).

 

Thoughts & Notes, Method, and Full Graphs after the Jump.

Star-divide

Click to enlarge:

Baserunning-al-june2010_medium

Baserunning-nl-june2010_medium

 

Method:

Data is based on 2010 results from Baseball Prospectus for the nine members of each team with the most plate appearances, regardless of position, and summed accordingly, pulled 06/13/10.

 

Notes and Thoughts:

1. It's hard not to notice that the NL appears to have overall better runners and decision-makers on the base path. Doesn't that kinda gel with what we believe the NL should be?

2. Jose Reyes and Angel Pagan: WOW.

3. In the course of this study, I discovered that Billy "the 23-year-old DH" Butler is currently tied for 2nd place in Kansas City with a 0.4 EQBRR. This comes as a total surprise, considering the team is supposed to be fast, athletic, and smart.

4. Now, most sabermetricians already know by heart that stealing bases is rarely worth it (you have to approach 70-75% success rate to make the risk of an out worth it), but the previous note and a couple other "oh, really?"-type big guys near the top of their respective team's list should tell you something else: "the only way to win is not to play." *

5. It's somewhat amusing to see power hitting teams like Tampa, Texas, and Milwaukee all near the best in their leagues for base running, while "speedy, grit-it-out" teams like Kansas City and Houston are in the negatives. Read: refer to previous point.

 

 

 

Comment 71 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The only first place team under 0.0 is the Padres. I wonder how much of a coincidence that is.

Twitter: @Ben_Duronio

by BenDuronio on Jun 14, 2010 8:10 AM EDT reply actions  

Not sure if relevant

…or park related, but in the course of this research I noticed that SD currently has the lowest BABIP, too.

by Justin Bopp on Jun 14, 2010 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

These graphs are beautiful.

The color. That title face. The subtle background. Love it.

On Twitter: @baseballtwit

by adarowski on Jun 14, 2010 8:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed!

But why are the better teams on the bottom?

by JD Sussman on Jun 14, 2010 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Is the visual joy of seeing

the better teams almost reach the base in the background overcome by the unconcious decision to reverse the Y axis?

by Justin Bopp on Jun 14, 2010 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, I decided Suss was right.

For the team graphs, I put the Y-axis back into what most people would expect. Not sure it looks as good, but oh well. I have a commitment to expectation!

by Justin Bopp on Jun 15, 2010 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks much, Adam.

And if you counter with another SaberCard 3.0, I’ll stab you with the sharp end of a DiamondView, I swear it!

by Justin Bopp on Jun 14, 2010 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Whose Diamondview would you use?

I’m just guessing here, but I bet a Jose Guillen Diamondview would be obscenely pointy down the power end. But there’d be nowhere to grab it.

Go Twins!

by Patrick42 on Jun 14, 2010 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Depends.

Probably a power-hitting shortstop. Love those guys—and their Diamondviews.

by Justin Bopp on Jun 15, 2010 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why didn't you

Just pull in the total team baserunning?

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/statistics/sortable/index.php?cid=69262

Seems like that might have been easier and better, no?

Orioles blogging at Camden Crazies | Follow on Twitter at @CamdenCrazies

by Daniel Moroz on Jun 14, 2010 9:30 AM EDT reply actions  

Actually, that does make sense (and would be easier). But

I originally set out to do a look at individual marks and changed my focus after the data had been collected. I think I will be breaking out the data for one or two particular teams per request in this comment section.

by Justin Bopp on Jun 14, 2010 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rays, please.

Hey, Surly only looks out for one guy...Surly!

by Andy Hellicksonstine on Jun 15, 2010 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

If I was to add up all of the teams EQBRR wouldn’t I expect that to come out to zero [since it is above/below average]? Well, YTD, the average team is actually at -1.6 runs. The sum only comesout to zero, if you exclude the SEVEN WORST teams in EQBRR!

Anyways, I compared EQBRR per game to total runs scored above league average per game and got a .30 correlation. Per 162 games, the top half of the teams are +74.1 runs and +1.06 EQBRR vs -75.0 and -9.17.

by erosen on Jun 14, 2010 10:05 AM EDT reply actions  

The Rangers are positive?

That blows my mind. They’ve had something like a 60% success rate on SBs this year. We’ve been bitching about their free-wheeling, caught-stealing ways almost all year at this point.

I guess they’re advancing really well on everything but stolen bases?

Other note, last year the Rangers had a ridiculous 90% SB success rate, so I wonder what our EQBRR would be worth this year if we had the same rate as last year.. Perhaps another half a win or more?

by Trickman on Jun 14, 2010 10:21 AM EDT reply actions  

It's not all about the basestealing.

I was a bit taken aback when I saw Rally had Nellie Fox worth +32 runs on the bases despite a SB% of 48.7% (76 SB, 80 CS)

Alas:

BSR – Baserunning runs. Includes stolen bases, advancement on hits, outs, wild pitches, passed balls, and outs made on bases. This is estimated from a regression formula for seasons without play by play data.

On Twitter: @baseballtwit

by adarowski on Jun 14, 2010 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

So

teams that hit multiple-base hits will benefit their EQBRR, assuming there is somebody on base?

by Justin Bopp on Jun 14, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think that's right.

I believe EQBRR includes first-to-third/second-to-home on singles, as well as first-to-home on doubles.

by jwiscarson on Jun 14, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Upon further review...

this is probably EqHAR.

I feel like somebody should create a sabermetric Snow White and the Seven Baserunning Dwarves using BP’s component names.

by jwiscarson on Jun 14, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

hehe

1. Equivalent Ground Advancement Runs (EqGAR) – Groundy
2. Equivalent Stolen Base Runs (EqSBR) – Stealie
3. Equivalent Air Advancement Runs (EqAAR) – Airey
4. Equivalent Hit Advancement Runs (EqHAR) – Hittie
5. Equivalent Other Advancement Runs (EqOAR) – Othery

by Justin Bopp on Jun 14, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I understand that.

My point is, that if SB breaks even at around 70% (0 runs) and the Rangers are at a 60% success rate, they are getting negative runs from their SB component to the tune of 10%

They’ve been caught stealing ALOT. But apparently they’re making alot of strong advancements on singles and doubles to make up for the SB losses. I’d like to know where they make this difference up, cause Rangers fans have generally looked at the team as giving up alot of stupid extra outs on the basepaths

by Trickman on Jun 14, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks James.

I’m posting the Mets Base Running graph next week, I think. They’re going up against Texas and Tampa.

by Justin Bopp on Jun 15, 2010 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm just wondering

but how do you traditional “speed guys” perform in this metric? You know, guys like Pierre, Bourn or Gardner?

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jun 14, 2010 1:41 PM EDT reply actions  

OK, that explains 0.82 Orioles losses

I’m assuming the other 45.18 losses rests with the batters.

Matt Wieters has a sustainably high BABIP

by CoachOfEarl on Jun 14, 2010 2:15 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Hey, that's not fair!

The pitching has been really awful too. Truly terrible.

To wit, they have the second worst xFIP in the majors – 4.81, beating the Indians by a mighty .02.
They’re just 4th from last in wOBA.

So, actually, the pitching has been even worse! Hah!

… sorry

Go Twins!

by Patrick42 on Jun 14, 2010 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

O's cumulative 1B: .215/.287/.263

The pitching just recently got ugly, the offense has been absent all season.

by CoachOfEarl on Jun 15, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I just picture the O's front office sitting there

And they’re sitting there thinking, “Wait, this is Garrett Atkins?”

Gotta love that precipitous decline (wOBA by year): .410, .368, .337, .291, .263

It’s like every year he challenges himself to lower his wOBA by at least 25 points.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jun 15, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Random note:

I’ll often remove the SB piece from BPro’s baserunning metrics. People tend to be more familiar with SB/CS, but less familiar with abilities to take bases in other situations. Of course, what you use depends on the question you’re asking.

by Sky Kalkman on Jun 14, 2010 4:47 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm confused.

Which is pretty easy to do, but I guess I don’t understand the purpose. SB/CS would seem like a vital component of base running. Why would you look at EQBRR without SB?

by Justin Bopp on Jun 14, 2010 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because people measure SB/CS separately.

It’s part of Fangraphs’ wOBA (I think) and therefore part of wRAA and WAR.

So if you wanted to add on the other baserunning stuff, you don’t want to double-count the SB piece.

Just an example. There are many situations where you’d certainly want to lump it all together.

by Sky Kalkman on Jun 14, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

just a couple of comments

Very nice job, but I do have a couple of graph questions. Why did you put the negative numbers up top? Seems counterintuitive to me. Also, is light green on dark green easy to see? Why did you approach the color contrast that way?

Don’t mean to be picky. Just wondering about your thought process.

by studes on Jun 14, 2010 6:06 PM EDT reply actions  

I put the negatives on top

because I wanted the visual effect of the “good” teams looking like they were reaching the same base as the character in the background. That said, I didn’t even think about it being counter-intuitive. Everything else we see has the best item on top, why shouldn’t this?

Next time I make these, I’ll probably adjust that to be more obvious and fit with expectations.

by Justin Bopp on Jun 14, 2010 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Color

The color choices are personal taste and based on a secret formula which I am sworn to never give away, but yes, light green on dark green is easy to see. ;)

If you’re looking for motivation, my current creative sensibilities are telling me that light on dark is easier to read than dark on light. I’ve always been a jewel-tone/bright primary type of visual designer, but neutrals are a fantastic way to go for data consumption.

Personal choice, really. Why, do you dislike the colors? I think that is one of the strongest things about this particular presentation.

by Justin Bopp on Jun 14, 2010 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Studes is a fan of the white background

He’s also a graph aficionado like yourself who’s been doing this since you were in diapers (not really though). I wanna see a duel! :)

by vivaelpujols on Jun 14, 2010 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

It reminds me of older console monitors

with light green text on dark backgrounds.

I’m also a fan of the color choices, and always heard the same things — one of my computer science teachers told us that IBM did a study in the 70s/80s on which backlit colors were the easiest on the human eyes, and came up with green on black. I’ve never actually seen the study, though.

by jwiscarson on Jun 15, 2010 8:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yep.

Though that wasn’t my inspiration, the philosophy is the same. I really just want them to stand out and be mostly functional in a thumbnail format.

by Justin Bopp on Jun 15, 2010 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Very Cool

Thanks and if i could ask, if you could do a team breakdown for the A’s? There were so much talk this year about being smarter and faster on the bases this year and it doesnt seem like its anning out that well. i realise they are one of only 4 AL positives but only just. I think i would have expected to see a much higher number than that.
Oh, love the colours, Greens always a nice colour, though think Gold woulda made a nice contrast to see :-)

Swisher on Ellis - "every day he does something that makes me say, 'Well, I'll be damned, look at that!'"

by Mantecan As Fan on Jun 14, 2010 7:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Damn spelling fail .... Panning out that well

Swisher on Ellis - "every day he does something that makes me say, 'Well, I'll be damned, look at that!'"

by Mantecan As Fan on Jun 14, 2010 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I did

the Mets, Rangers, and Rays. I noticed Oakland was at the top of another chart—let me use them for a break out?

by Justin Bopp on Jun 15, 2010 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Considering how little the Phils are stealing bases this season...

I’d love to see this for the 2009 year.

This is the new/current account of RyanGiggs11
"College is only 4 years, but the Eagles are for life." - Ironhank

by Scott Kessler on Jun 15, 2010 3:56 AM EDT reply actions  

what base stealing…you mean watching other teams do it at will against us.

by j reed on Jun 15, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Possible typo? TBA should be TBR or am I missing something?

by j reed on Jun 15, 2010 12:49 PM EDT reply actions  

in the very nice and well labeled graphs.

by j reed on Jun 15, 2010 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really? What’s wrong with TBR and SDP. It not like some unfamiliar with baseball is gonna pick up BP.

by j reed on Jun 15, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

that’s should read – someone unfamiliar with baseball…

by j reed on Jun 15, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

What's strange to me is not that they use N and A. . .

. . . but that they use it while using NYY and NYM and CHC and CHW.

I don’t quite understand why they don’t all use the first team letter or the first league letter.

Not that any of this matters.

by philkid3 on Jun 16, 2010 5:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz