Teams Paying for Players No Longer on the Team
Recently Rob Neyer (here and here) and Joe Posnanski (here) brought up how some teams are still paying the salaries of players released or traded to other teams. I went to Cot's Contracts to find which teams were being burdened by these contracts. The site also listed which teams had players on them that had some of the salaries paid by other teams for a total over 168 million dollars in 2010. Here are the 5 biggest salaries being paid by another team:
| Name | Amount | Team Paying Salary Amount | New Team |
| Jeff Suppan | $12,500,000 | Brewers | Free Agent |
| Dontrelle Willis | $11,726,776 | Tigers | Diamondbacks |
| Gary Matthews Jr. | $10,500,000 | Angels | Free Agent |
| B.J. Ryan | $10,000,000 | Blue Jays | Free Agent |
| Nate Robertson | $9,600,000 | Tigers | Marlins |
I have gone ahead and put all the players on a Google Spreadsheet for people to use.
The following graph ranks, in millions of dollars, which teams is paying the most out to players no longer on the team. If a team gets money from another team to pay a players salary, those values are considered negative.
Now, large payroll teams will be able to handle an extra ten million in payroll better than low payroll teams. Here are the teams ranked from the largest percentage of payroll not going to players on the teams to the teams that are getting most of their payroll from other teams.
Teams like the Blue Jays, Brewers and Tigers have limited their options do to the millions of dollars being spent on players not on the team. Eleven teams wasted no money or came out ahead once the money is distributed.
21 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
let me look
probably an over site on my part
- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …
by Jeff Zimmerman on Jun 11, 2010 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Corrected - All I can think I was tired of copying data from COTS once I got to them at the end
- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …
by Jeff Zimmerman on Jun 11, 2010 1:23 AM EDT up reply actions
You omitted the huge chunk of change the Diamondbacks owed Eric Byrnes before the Mariners signed him.
I can't resist clicking "Rec" when I see a post with four [of them] already.
And I don't want to sound like a dick, so I apologize for being so terse.
I can't resist clicking "Rec" when I see a post with four [of them] already.
by thehemogoblin on Jun 11, 2010 6:12 AM EDT up reply actions
No problem, I am as only as good as my data
I took the information from here:
http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/2005/01/arizona-diamondbacks_10.html
- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …
by Jeff Zimmerman on Jun 11, 2010 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Isn't Texas still paying a good part of Alex Rodriguez's contract or something?
I thought I remembered hearing reference to that recently with all the bankruptcy hoopla.
I write at:
Beyond the Boxscore | Red Reporter | Basement-Dwellers.com | Twitter: @jinazreds
2007
IIRC, it was announced during game 4, just before the Sox clinched.
Because, of course, it was a much bigger story that A-Roid was probably going to get paid an extra $5 million a year than that the World Series was about to be won.
Yeah, I remember that.
I think he criticized Boras for doing that during the playoffs a day later or something.
Overall, I think he tries to be a nice guy, but he just really lacks any interpersonal skills.
I wasn't for sure how to handle that one.
The Mets are getting a nice piece of change from LAA which puts them quite a bit in the black. Maybe I should remove the $$$ heading to the Mets.
- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …
by Jeff Zimmerman on Jun 11, 2010 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions
20% of the money the Jays are spending this year might be going to players not on the team
but it’s not 20% of the money they could be spending if they wanted to.
They're not just hitting home runs. They're doing the little things, like hitting doubles.
The Cardinals have 3 players that other teams are fitting the bill for
Randy Winn, Aaron Miles, and now Jeff Suppan
Bobby Bonilla's annuity
I’m not sure how that should be tracked, but its a million a year starting now and running for 20 years. It was his buyout for his final year with the Mets.
Fantastic work
At first I was relieved to see that the Giants were at zero. Then it occurred to me that being high on this list isn’t necessarily all bad – the teams near the top may have inked bad contracts, but their presence means that they identified the sunk costs and made appropriate changes. Teams like the Giants just keep running Aaron Rowand out there nearly every day.
Proud member of the Adopt-a-Giant program (Aaron Rowand)
I thought the Rockies are still paying Mike Hampton?
It’s a vague memory though so I might be wrong.

by 




















