Can Texas Really Win 92 Games?
Yesterday, Texas Rangers president Nolan Ryan said that he believed that his team could win 92 games, and that the expectation was that his team would win the division.
"I just feel like that's a number [92] that this ballclub should be able to reach. It's hard to sit here before we play a spring game and predict, but I feel like we have the depth and talent and we're capable of doing that," Ryan told Richard Durrett of ESPN Dallas on Wednesday.
Now, Ryan mentioned that there's always the possibility that his team is capable of taking the AL West with less wins, but for most of us, 92 wins would seem like some awfully lofty expectations, even for a team coming off of an 87-win season with the run differential of an 85-win team.
Here are how the different projection systems see the Rangers for next season:
CHONE: 86-76, 1st in the AL West, five games ahead of Oakland and Los Angeles (as of 2/5/10)
CAIRO: 81-81, 2nd in the AL West, two games behind Seattle (as of 2/23/10)
PECOTA: 85-77, 1st in the AL West, two games ahead of Seattle (as of 2/25/10)
So clearly, Ryan is getting ahead of himself a little bit with the high hopes of a 92-win season. But of course, if the Rangers are accurately a 85-86 win team based on true talent, which both CHONE and PECOTA indicate, then with some good luck a 92-win season is more than possible.
The rotation could be absolutely dominant with Scott Feldman, Rich Harden, Derek Holland, Colby Lewis and Neftali Feliz. Feldman was pretty solid last season, we all know what Harden is capable of when he's health, Holland still posted a 4.38 xFIP in Texas last season and has a good deal of room for improvement, Lewis was arguably the best pitcher in Japan during his stint there, and Feliz has the raw stuff to keep up with practically any pitcher in the game. Toss a good bullpen in there along with additional options like Brandon McCarthy, Tommy Hunter and Matt Harrison, and the Rangers have a pitching staff that could potentially keep up with anyone in that division.
The defense should once again be solid, with a good defensive outfield of Josh Hamilton, Julio Borbon and Nelson Cruz, along with solid defense up the middle from Taylor Teagarden, Elvis Andrus and Ian Kinsler. They certainly won't be able to keep up with what the Athletics and Mariners are putting out on the field daily, but once again they should be a pretty solid defensive squad as a whole.
The lineup is pretty interesting as well. Kinsler is clearly one of the better players in the AL, and I think that it's reasonable to expect quality seasons from Cruz, Young and Andrus. Hamilton and Vlad Guerrero give the offense some serious upside, Borbon has a chance to be Juan Pierre with more patience and better defense, and it's too early to write off Chris Davis, Jarrod Saltalamacchia, and Teagarden just yet. A few lucky breaks (healthy seasons from Guerrero and Hamilton, a breakout from Salty, Davis or maybe even Justin Smoak) and it could be one of the better offenses in the game.
Now, I think that PECOTA and CHONE probably have it about right, that the Rangers' true talent level isn't remotely close to 92 wins, and probably sits more so in the mid-80's. Which means that a 92-win season isn't particularly likely, and the team could just as easily dip their win total in the high-70's if things don't go as planned.
But the projection systems don't really seem to disagree with Ryan's notion that Texas should expect to win the AL West this season, and with a few lucky breaks and the right midseason acquisition, Ryan may not be that far off base with his comments.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
this could be the year that it only takes 87 wins to win the AL West
but I doubt it. I don’t think improving 5 games will be a problem IF they remain healthy.
Vladimir Guererro - 2010 AL MVP
I agree, mostly
The additions of Harden and Lewis give the rotation so much upside before even getting into Neftali Feliz. The Guerrero addition didn’t make as much sense to me, I think that it’s a long shot that he returns to his previous level, but having a full year of Hamilton could make a huge difference.
I absolutely think Texas is capable of winning 92 games, just like any other team with a true talent level in the 85-86 win range
I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy
by Satchel Price on Mar 4, 2010 1:32 PM EST up reply actions
Who do you think should have been their DH?
They had a glaring hole at DH and wanted a righty bat for the middle of the line-up. So they went with a guy who put up wOBAs of .319, .417 and .430 from from June to August.
I think the Guerrerro move made perfect sense.
I just thought that $6.5M plus incentives
was a lot for a DH who’s likely to post a 1.5-2.0 WAR in 2010 if he’s healthy. The declining walk rate and power production are concerning. It just seemed like a big chunk of cash for Vlad; not an awful move, they’re still in good shape, but I didn’t regard it as a great move like the Lewis one.
I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy
by Satchel Price on Mar 4, 2010 1:50 PM EST up reply actions
Few things.
First off, if it’s 1.5 it will probably be worth it in FA dollars. CHONE, for example, projects him to be worth 7.5 million on the market.
Second, it’s a one year contract, so it’s not like it’s tying their hands for the future. The only problem it brings is if it keeps them from going after someone else to fill DH this year, and I don’t think it does. Who’s available to be better?
Third, I don’t think it’s necessarily a great move, but it’s a simple, important and sensible move that fills a need. What would be your suggestion for DH?
For one, they could have let Hamilton, Murphy, Davis and Smoak split time
between first base, left field, and DH, or they could’ve opted for someone cheaper like Thome. As I said, I don’t think that it was necessarily a BAD move, I probably just would’ve waited to see if a cheaper option emerges.
As you said though, it’s relatively low-risk and it fills a need, so Texas could have done worse with their money (such as spend $2M on Alex Cora and $6M on Jason Kendall.).
I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy
by Satchel Price on Mar 4, 2010 2:12 PM EST up reply actions
The thing is, if your need is DH and you have X amount of dollars to spend on players. . .
. . . I just struggle to see what saving money is doing to make the team better. It’s one thing if it’s a multi-year deal, but if the option is spend it for the best player you can get, or get the best value, unless you have a lot more needs you need to go for, I think on a one year deal you go ahead and spend.
Maybe I’m wrong.
CHONE, of course, isn't guaranteed to be right.
But FWIW, it thinks Vlad is going to be three times the player Thome is. And Vlad looked pretty good after he got healthy in the second half.
It really depends on whether that money
could have been used for in-season acquisitions. I’d be shocked if their entire infield was healthy all year and the current backups are Esteban German and Joaquin Arias.
It’s just about whether that kind of move impacts their ability to make moves in-season.
It’s like every other move; there’s some risk involved. It’s not really a bad move, I just wonder if they could have added a cheaper hitter to add some flexibility midseason.
But it’s definitely not like the Vlad signing directly lowers their chances of contending all year and making the playoffs.
I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy
by Satchel Price on Mar 4, 2010 3:23 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Well, they're getting their Khalil Greene money back and apparently pursuing Julio Lugo.
If Lugo’s our UIF, I’ll be pretty happy.
And payroll should not be an issue moving forward
So if someone better is needed at a later date, it shouldn’t be a big deal.
"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW
"When you have a weapon on your shoulder like he has, you can be cool." RW on Perez
And the little bastard threw it for a swinging strike three in a 3-2 count. He’s blessed. And ballsy.
Lugo would definitely be a solid addition.
But with Ryan coming back from injury, they’ll probably keep Lugo around rather than go with Tyler Greene to fill out their current infield.
Esteban German may be poor defensively, but CHONE projects him for an above average .340 wOBA next season, so he’s not the worst option until they figure something else out.
I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy
by Satchel Price on Mar 5, 2010 3:16 PM EST up reply actions
92 is definitely doable.
If you look at last year as an 85-86 win season, that’s 6 or 7 added wins. Getting that out of steps forward from Andrus, Borbon, Feliz, Holland and Hunter, replacing Padilla and Millwood with Harden and Lewis and bounce backs from Hamilton and Davis is pretty realistic to envision.
Sure, no one should pick 92 (I’m at 86 or 87 currently), but that has to be within their potential level of variance.
It's so difficult to predict wins at the beginning of the season
That goes without saying. There are way too many variables, not the least of which is injury, roster construction, managerial decisions, luck, etc.
Having said that, I’m bullish on the Rangers’ ability to perform at the high end of their projections, mostly because of this:
with…the right midseason acquisition, Ryan may not be that far off base with his comments.
MLBTR made the point yesterday that no other team is as well positioned to make a mid-season acquisition. Given the depth of the farm system and the impending 40pocalypse that’s coming in the next offseason, you have to think that JD is going to do something to try and improve the big league club in July.
I have more thoughts, but I’ll step back and see where the discussion goes.
meta-signature
I think that midseason flexibility can be pretty huge
especially when you’re going into the season using so many relatively unproven players like Davis, Lewis and Borbon along with injury question marks like Hamilton, Harden, and Guerrero.
As you said, this looks like a team that could pounce on an impact player that becomes available this summer, if the fit is right. Combine that with a roster that has a good amount of untapped potential, and the Rangers probably have one of the bigger ranges for their 2010 performance of any MLB team.
And as you noted, this is far from an exact science, otherwise what the hell would be the point of playing the actual games? But the fact of the matter is that these projections do have some correlation to final standings, they give us a solid look of which teams are better going into the season, and quite frankly, they’re just fun to talk about.
I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy
by Satchel Price on Mar 5, 2010 3:14 PM EST up reply actions

by 

















