Could Eric Chavez Be This Spring's Gary Sheffield?
This really isn't anything more than an interesting note, but Matt Klaasen's piece on FanGraphs yesterday (which is a good read, as always) brought to light the idea that former franchise player Eric Chavez really doesn't fit into Oakland's roster particularly well.
The presumption is that Chavez has a leg up on making Oakland's roster as a back-up 1B/3B because he's due $15M before the end of his contract, with a $12M salary for 2010 and a $3M buyout of his 2011 club option. At the time of the six-year, $66M extension, Chavez was coming off years of 5.6, 4.1 and 5.7 WAR in his age 24-26 seasons, flashing a consistent +20-25 run bat and one of the best gloves in the league at third base. But injuries have made the deal one of the most maligned in the league, as Chavez only played 31 games in the past two seasons and really hasn't been the same player since 2004.
I know Spring Training statistics are about as worthless as post-grunge music, but Chavez is batting just .192 this spring with 2 homers and 5 RBI in 9 games, and while scouts have said that he should make a fine transition to first base, he'll never really be the same defender at the hot corner. The A's already have everyday first and third basemen in Daric Barton and Kevin Kouzmanoff, respectively. They have a good utility infielder in Adam Rosales, and as Klaasen's piece concluded, they should probably try to find room on their roster for a potentially very good hitter in offseason acquisition Jake Fox.
Right now, Oakland's bench projects as catcher Landon Powell, Chavez, Rosales and outfielder Gabe Gross, which excludes both Fox and utility man Eric Patterson. Rosales, Powell and Gross would seem to be locks for the bench, as Oakland's likely to prioritize their defensive value and Gross has had a very good spring. But squeezing Fox off the roster presumably wasn't what GM Billy Beane planned when he traded reliever Jeff Gray and prospects Ronny Morla and Matt Spencer to Chicago for Fox and the contract of Aaron Miles, which then ended up in Cincinnati as part of the Rosales deal.
Last spring, the Tigers surprised the league by releasing designated hitter Gary Sheffield, eating the remaining $14M minus the league minimum that the New York Mets paid upon signing him. The Tigers were expected to let Sheffield take the DH role again, but after a very disappointing 2008 the team opted to let their other veterans, such as Miguel Cabrera, Carlos Guillen, Marcus Thames and eventually Aubrey Huff, to rotate through the position.
Could the Athletics similarly eat Chavez's $15M this spring? At this point, anything is purely speculation, as the Athletics haven't really made any hints towards what their plans are with Chavez, and maybe they'd like to give their former cornerstone one more chance to prove himself before pulling the plug, as he's apparently finally healthy. But this is a guy who hasn't really been an effective major leaguer in years, and he's on a roster that's full of younger, healthier options that could potentially match or even exceed his production. Maybe Chavez proves to be healthy and has an unlikely late-career Renaissance. But right now, he's this year's candidate to be last year's Gary Sheffield.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Seems like a perfect candidate
With his degenerative condition there’s really no point hanging onto him. He will never be a good regular for you again and he won’t even be able to establish some trade value.
However, John Perrotto of BP had this to say yesterday:
—It’s going to be a 60/40 split between Chavez and Barton as far as playing time from what I’ve been told.
http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=10353
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
Oh wow I didn't see that.
This is a team with both Barton and Fox, along with numerous 1B prospects, and they’re gonna give Chavez most of the playing time.
That’s pretty questionable.
I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy
by Satchel Price on Mar 25, 2010 11:22 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Very questionable. I really don't understand the thought process behind this move - though I'm not a Barton fan.
The A’s fans are going to go nuts. Did you notice they apparently plan on batting Chavez cleanup as well (according to the article)?
Perotto is pretty reliable… though he did make a few errors in that article. Though the Chavez/ Barton thing was a very specific comment in his corrections.
Can Chavez even handle back to back days…? I mean… probably all a moot point when Chavez goes on the DL for three months on April 17th. Still doesn’t make any sense to me.
I don’t understand what Billy Beane is doing anymore. It scares me. Either a) his genius has yet again exceeded my level of baseball knowledge/understanding; b) Beane has completely lost it; or c) I’ve completely lost it.
I’m not ready to rule anything out yet.
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
I realize there arent any good middle of the order candidates there...
but Id imagine putting Chavez there means shuffling the lineup dramatically day to day. All to accommodate a guy who you have no idea what you’re getting.
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
But Chavez really hasn't been a middle of the order threat since 2004.
From 2005 to 2009, Chavez was just 2.9 runs above average with the bat over 1775 plate appearances. This guy will simply never be the same hitter that he was from 2000 through 2004.
Why not see what Fox and Barton can do? Maybe Cust returns to his monster levels of 2007. This team is obviously built around run prevention, and they really need to find pop when they can. I just don’t understand why they think that Chavez will provide that.
I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy
by Satchel Price on Mar 25, 2010 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Yup. Makes no sense to me.
Even on a team with little middle of the order options and Kurt Suzuki hitting 3rd it doesnt make much sense.
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
A 60/40 split of 1B playing would be disastrous.
I’d be worried if it’s anything less than 80/20 in favor of Barton.
This never happened, but I saw you leave
and crawl into a bed of broken windows.
Agreed. Barton needs his shot.
He could either emerge as a part of their core or a nice trade chip once Carter is ready. This was a guy who had a platoon split leaning towards RH as a minor leaguer, but he’s been substantially better against lefties in the majors.
He’s obviously not as good against lefties as he’s been, but he’s also surely better than he’s been against right-handers. For a team that’s appreciated a patient, developed approach at the plate for so long, I don’t know why they would sour on Barton. He looked significantly better at the plate in 2009.
I’ll be disappointed if Barton doesn’t finish the year with 400+ plate appearances.
I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy
by Satchel Price on Mar 25, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Barton/Chavez L/L platoon
1) Barton and Chavez both hit lefty,
2) Barton is a plus glove at 1B, we don’t know about Chavez, but I doubt he woudl be significantly better than Barton
3) CHONE neutralized lwts/150: Barton +16, Fox +9, Chavez -4
4) If there’s a platoon, it should involve Fox (a RHH) over Chavez
5) If anyone supplants Barton other than Fox, it should be Chris Carter
6) Who else in the “middle of the order?” or in the top 5? How about anyone who projects as a better hitter than Chavez? That list would include (no particular order): Cust, Barton, Sweeney, Suzuki, Kouzmanoff, Travis Buck, Gabe Gross, and Eric Patterson
7) Thanks for the link
6) Thanks for the link
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
that should be "8)"
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Mar 25, 2010 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions

by 





























