Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Josh Hamilton Reportedly Seen Drinking In Dallas Bar

Percentage of Team Payroll Lost to Time on DL (Update 2/20/10)

Update:  I have added some more information at the article's end looking at totals for trips less than and more than 30 days.

After using Josh Hermsmeyer's injury database from RotoBlog.com to look at individual players, I will now look at the total Salary lost to teams.  Here is the list of 30 teams ordered by percentage lost, highest loss to lowest loss from 2002 to 2009.

Rank Team Total Salary Salary Lost Total Days Number of Trips Percentage of Total Payroll
1 LAD $802,269,413 $214,186,872 6717 61 27%
2 WAS $395,077,500 $87,927,311 7395 73 22%
3 TEX $592,355,667 $130,295,946 8521 77 22%
4 NYM $912,960,802 $198,784,051 7922 72 22%
5 ARI $567,058,065 $112,040,169 6347 72 20%
6 ATL $752,293,394 $146,002,505 6574 67 19%
7 OAK $456,603,575 $88,576,685 5211 50 19%
8 SD $450,328,690 $84,326,605 5964 68 19%
9 KCR $415,440,333 $77,368,885 7206 81 19%
10 DET $650,323,576 $120,741,210 6621 53 19%
11 BAL $559,966,955 $100,803,387 7716 68 18%
12 CLE $481,570,082 $82,899,809 5499 61 17%
13 ANA $781,804,489 $131,803,169 1864 24 17%
14 TBA $279,920,832 $45,948,441 4898 62 16%
15 STL $701,113,759 $113,433,432 6370 57 16%
16 CIN $490,024,584 $71,801,485 6894 70 15%
17 MIL $448,053,000 $65,448,742 4862 53 15%
18 COL $476,445,377 $67,833,222 5768 71 14%
19 SF $673,267,093 $91,626,965 4202 53 14%
20 TOR $555,509,833 $75,545,147 5243 57 14%
21 CHC $780,401,763 $106,017,190 5444 58 14%
22 PHI $705,761,638 $86,937,200 4540 62 12%
23 HOU $655,044,680 $79,356,784 3888 44 12%
24 BOS $976,978,257 $117,482,570 5556 71 12%
25 NYY $1,464,447,266 $175,817,451 6107 57 12%
26 MIN $462,768,538 $50,398,150 4917 49 11%
27 PIT $350,135,323 $37,785,164 4759 49 11%
28 FLO $298,132,793 $25,716,545 6007 56 9%
29 SEA $747,503,317 $59,606,332 5245 52 8%
30 CHW $677,133,665 $38,169,033 2135 38 6%

Graph of comparing totals after jump

Star-divide

Salarycomps_medium

Few notes:

  1. The Dodgers being in first is no surprise.
  2. I figured the Yankees would have been higher.  Their total amount lost is less than the Dodgers and the Mets.
  3. Teams should figure out what the White Sox are doing to prevent injuries.  They are amazingly good.

Tom Tango started a thread on this topic over at The Book Blog.  Since Tom was voted BtB's Best Researcher and Writer, I figured I would go ahead and answer a few of his questions.  He was mainly interested in the amount of salary that was lost after a player was on the DL for greater than 30 days.  The amount before 30 would not be covered by insurance, but the amount over 30 days would be covered.

Description Dollars Percentage
Total Amount $18,560,694,259 100.0%
Salary lost from trips 30 days or less $434,260,356 2.3%
Salary lost from trips > 30 days $2,373,561,406 12.8%
Total Salary Lost $2,807,821,761 15.1%
Salary covered by insurance (> 31days on DL) $1,460,573,173 7.9%
Salary not covered by insurance (30 or less days on DL) $1,347,248,588 7.3%

Description Days
Days lost from trips 30 days or less 23687
Days lost from trips > 30 days 143548
Total Days Lost 167235
Days covered by insurance (> 31days on DL) 92218
Days not covered by insurance (30 or less days on DL) 75017

Description Trips to DL
DL trips 30 days or less 1202
DL trips > 30 days 1711
Total DL Trips 2913

Few notes on the above charts:

  1. The dollar amounts covered by insurance and not covered are about the same ($1.5 billion vs 1.3 billion)
  2. Many more days on DL occur after 30 days than before (92K vs 75K).  Also more trips to DL last more than 30 days than less than 30 days (1711 vs 1202)

Comment 14 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I asked this in the other thread but are you taking into account insurance at all? I doubt I can find the article but I’m pretty sure a good majority of Hampton’s salary during those years was covered by insurance. I don’t know how that all works (I imagine it’s different for each case) but I imagine it would have a big effect on your numbers.

by jfish26101 on Feb 19, 2010 5:39 PM EST reply actions  

What time period is this data over?

The writer formerly known as Jabberwocky
READ and LEARN about the business of baseball at Purple Row Academy
Eschew Obfuscation!

by Jeff Aberle on Feb 19, 2010 6:12 PM EST reply actions  

Guessing it is off of the date show here which is 2002-2009.

by jfish26101 on Feb 19, 2010 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I would like to see

how strong the correlation is with average (or median?) roster age.

/auto-defenestrates

Dear Internet,
Please fire Brian Sabean.
Signed,
Me

FREE KEVIN FRANDSEN!!! Member of the Frandsen 5% Club.

by Uribe nee Gonzalez on Feb 19, 2010 7:45 PM EST reply actions  

Not at all (Angels and Washington not used because of name change)

Average age on y axis and % of Salary on x axis

- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …

by Jeff Zimmerman on Feb 19, 2010 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Holy Washington

Not only can they not afford to pay anyone, they got nothing for 22% of what the dished out. Oof.

by adarowski on Feb 19, 2010 9:49 PM EST reply actions  

This is very cool

Awesome work.

How did you calculate the salaries lost? If a player with a $10 million salary was on the DL for 15 days, does he count the same as a $10 million player who missed the whole year? Or would you just count 15/183 of the total salary (in this example)?

by Eric Stephen on Feb 19, 2010 11:14 PM EST reply actions  

Thanks

I was just wondering. This is fantastic info.

by Eric Stephen on Feb 20, 2010 12:01 AM EST up reply actions  

poor Tampa

I am guessing Baldelli affects these numbers quite a bit

Belief that success is inevitable is as likely to hold you back as a belief that it is impossible.

by TomCat009 on Feb 21, 2010 10:23 PM EST reply actions  

very good! I enjoyed this...

 the percentage of a teams payroll which is lost to time on the DL is really interesting. I emailed this to some people i know that would really like this.

by hurlerhurley on Feb 22, 2010 10:49 PM EST reply actions  

Glad you liked it and I hope they find it useful

- .-. ..- … – / – …. . / .—. .-. - .. . … …

by Jeff Zimmerman on Feb 23, 2010 10:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Free Agent Compensation
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
Strike_three2_small
Effect of Foul Area on Strikeouts: AL 1954-68: Erratum
Small
Baseball on a stick
Small
Player Evaluating Statistic
Baseball_small
Rays Outfield: Cheap but Extremely Productive
Small
A new xBABIP
Small
Jack Morris "pitching to the score"
Strike_three2_small
Foul Area and Differences in SO: AL vs NL
Baseball_small
Is there a Kuroda and Oswalt Alternative?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Picture-6_small Chris St. John

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung