Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

This is my favorite primer of the past, oh, 78 days. Yes, Colin eventually discusses the wOBA formula, but the majority of his article is about what matters on offense (which everybody knows, intuitively), why current stats fail to measure it accurately (which everyone knows, intuitively, once you point it out) and why wOBA does it the right way.

You don't convince people that a formula is right by showing them the nitty-gritty details (a "proof", if you will). You convince them by demonstrating you know what you're talking about and that your thought process makes sense. Then skip the sausage-making and instead let them taste the sausage.

(I just set myself up for an avalanche of sausage jokes, didn't I? Crap.)

Hat tip: Tango.

over 2 years ago Limes_125_tiny Sky Kalkman 4 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

BtB

“Where you can taste as much sausage as you like.”

I don’t know, maybe it needs some work. It might be a little hard to swallow.

Thanks for the link. I am going to send that to some of my old-school stat-inclined friends.

/auto-defenestrates

Dear Internet,
Please fire Brian Sabean.
Signed,
Me

FREE KEVIN FRANDSEN!!! Member of the Frandsen 5% Club.

by Uribe nee Gonzalez on Feb 19, 2010 8:09 PM EST reply actions  

One change I'd make is in addressing why OPS misses the boat.

True, there’s the denominator problem. And you need to weight OBP more. But it’s not because OBP is more important (as shown by regressing OBP and SLG against team scoring). It’s because one point of OBP means more than 1 point of SLG. Basically, you need to spread OBP values out so that a gap of 1 point of adjusted OBP means as much as 1 point of SLG.

And then I’d talk about how (if you ignore denominators), you’re basically doing…

OPS
= OBP + SLG
= times on base + total bases
= (BB + 1B + 2B + 3B + HR) + (1B + 2×2B + 3×3B + 4xHR)
= BB + 2×1B + 3×2B + 4×3B + 5xHR

That’s obviously not a bad estimate, but is a HR really worth five times as much as a walk? Is a triple twice as good as a 1B? Isn’t it just a little too convenient that the relative worth of these events lines up like this? Wouldn’t it be nice to know how valuable each thing is to the others, exactly? Whoila, linear weights and wOBA.

by Sky Kalkman on Feb 19, 2010 11:14 PM EST reply actions  

i like that

that’s more or less how Tango laid it out in the comments, too

I'd rather have Rios steal 50 bases than hit 50 home runs. I want production.

by colintj on Feb 21, 2010 3:51 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree, this is exactly what I like to see in a primer

The why and what is so much more important and interesting than the how.

by vivaelpujols on Feb 20, 2010 3:29 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz