Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why Hockey Fans Should Root For Devils Vs. Kings

"Team X won't trade Player Y inside division" also means "Team X won't take quality players away from Team Z inside division".

Sky Kalkman | Twitter

In response to the Royals not willing to trade Greinke within the AL Central, and it's a good take, too.

over 1 year ago Jbopp-kc_tiny Justin Bopp 6 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Here's the question, though:

Assuming we’re talking about prospects, is taking unknown talent away from a rival worth seeing known talent with a rival? I’m not sure it is.

The baseball season doesn't have to end! Create your own players, coach your own teams, and join your friends in THE premier baseball MMO. Two Out Rally opens October 25th!
Two Out Rally, BASEBALL MMORPG | Facebook | @2OutRally

by Justin Bopp on Dec 2, 2010 11:23 AM EST reply actions  

Whoa whoa whoa

So you’re saying that Royals don’t like Chicago’s Viciedo/Flowers/Escobar/Infante offer?!??!?

Baseball is my preferred sport. It should be yours, too.
I'm an editor for Beyond the Box Score, an SB Nation blog.

by Satchel Price on Dec 2, 2010 11:46 AM EST reply actions  

Ugh dont bring up Viciedo....

I thought that the Brewers blew it when they turned down Hudson/Viciedo for Fielder last July. Doug Melvin foolishly asking for Gordon Beckham to be included. Kenny Williams probably refers to Melvin now as that “silly cracker!”

Who else in the division has the prospects to make the deal? Twins or Tigers maybe, but not the Sox. Maybe if it included Sale, Viciedo, Flowers and Morel. Or the Tigers sending both Oliver and Turner gets it done.

I get the logic in it, but whenever I’m thinking trades I just never even consider intradivisional ones, especially when it involves top tier talent or prospects.

by backtocali on Dec 2, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with Sky here, especially in the situation the Royals are creating.

We’re trading Greinke because we won’t be competitive during his contract but we won’t take prospects that will help us after Greinke’s contract is up and likely gone from the division?

Glad I came, just wish I hadn't stayed so long.

People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball...Rock Chalk Talk

by Warden11 on Dec 2, 2010 8:51 PM EST reply actions  

This is wrong

The reason you don’t trade inside the division is that the zero-sum element of the trade is so much larger than normal that it is incredibly hard to find enough non-zero-sum gains for each side to make the trade overcome standard inertia.

Normally, if a trade improves you and the partner by 3 wins each, you’d make the deal without hesitating. If it’s a divisional rival, suddenly you’re not improving at all relative to one of your key competitors.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2010 1:31 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz