Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Benefit of the Doubt: Batters in the Zone

In my last three posts, I covered the pitchers who got the most out of the strike zone—and those who did not. This week we'll take a look at the zone from the batter's perspective. Now, as I explained earlier in this series, there is no particular skill in working the zone. Whether or not a pitch is favorably, fairly or unfavorably called is dependent on the characteristics of the pitch and the context in which it is thrown. As it turns out, one of the most important factors is batter handedness.

Pitchers—both sinister and dextrous—are at a significant disadvantage when they face right-handed batters. That is to say, right-handed batters are significantly advantaged in terms of the strike zone. Take a look at how much the zone shrinks when a righty comes to the plate:

Batter-zone_medium

Not only does the zone shrink, but the umpire takes a way a small chunk of the low zone. In exchange, they give back a bit of the inside corner. So it's not surprising that the least fortunate batters over the last two seasons (minimum 500 called pitches) were lefties, and that the most fortunate righties are far better off than the most fortunate lefties. Take a look:

Star-divide

Batter Standing Called Pitches Zone Disdvantage Standard Deviations
Aviles, Mike R 887 1.92% 0.13
Gomes, Jonny R 1,429 1.75% 0.12
Pence, Hunter R 2,222 1.44% 0.09
Baker, Jeff R 821 1.22% 0.07
Crosby, Bobby R 842 1.07% 0.06
Desmond, Ian R 941 1.06% 0.06
Helms, Wes R 1,022 0.98% 0.05
Soriano, Alfonso R 1,727 0.98% 0.05
Phillips, Brandon R 2,017 0.89% 0.04
Aybar, Erick R 518 0.77% 0.03
// // // // //
Molina, Yadier R 1,698 -4.95% -0.44
McGehee, Casey R 1,819 -5.28% -0.47
Pedroia, Dustin R 2,437 -5.42% -0.48
Salazar, Oscar R 603 -5.47% -0.49
Rollins, Jimmy R 602 -5.48% -0.49
Roberts, Brian R 696 -5.60% -0.50
Young, Michael R 2,250 -5.91% -0.52
Johnson, Rob R 945 -5.93% -0.53
Kendall, Jason R 1,937 -6.40% -0.57
Andrus, Elvis R 2,559 -6.72% -0.59

 

Batter Standing Called Pitches Zone Disdvantage Standard Deviations
Walker, Neil L 637 9.42% 0.76
Davis, Ike L 1,095 8.68% 0.69
Hafner, Travis L 1,685 8.66% 0.69
Snider, Travis L 953 6.82% 0.54
Reyes, Jose L 1,012 6.23% 0.49
Young, Delwyn L 851 6.11% 0.48
Schierholtz, Nate L 888 6.08% 0.48
Morales, Kendry L 1,325 5.89% 0.46
Parra, Gerardo L 1,369 5.70% 0.45
Jones, Garrett L 1,792 5.64% 0.44
// // // // //
Bard, Josh L 570 -1.23% -0.13
Thome, Jim L 1,732 -1.50% -0.16
Cabrera, Everth L 1,037 -1.74% -0.18
Griffey Jr., Ken L 1,243 -1.77% -0.18
Gwynn, Tony L 1,727 -1.91% -0.19
Pena, Carlos L 2,149 -2.23% -0.22
Langerhans, Ryan L 512 -2.34% -0.23
Blanco, Gregor L 621 -2.42% -0.23
Varitek, Jason L 767 -2.87% -0.27
Vizquel, Omar L 937 -4.27% -0.39

 

Note: the batters with the lowest zone disadvantage are the most fortunate; switch-hitters are split into separate categories, so that switch-hitters (like Omar Vizquel) appear as Vizquel, L and Vizquel, R.

It's telling that the most fortunate right-handed batters are 0.6 standard deviations from the mean, while the best left-hander is only 0.4 (and the best true lefty is only -0.23). On the other end of the scale, the most disadvantaged lefties are 3/4 of a standard deviation from the mean while the most disadvantaged righty is darn near close to average.

By far the most fortunate right-handed batter over the last two seasons was Elvis Andrus:

Andrus-zone_medium

Ask yourself if you'd like to try to hit that on a full count with the bases loaded (typical RHB zone superimposed). Same applies to Dustin Pedroia and Jimmy Rollins:

Pedroia-zone_medium

Rollins-zone-_rhb__medium

As noted above, we're looking only at Jimmy Rollins' right-handed at bats. Fellow switch-hitter Omar Vizquel has been the most successful when batting left:

Vizquel-zone-_lhb__medium

In terms of true lefties, the great Junior Griffey got the benefit of the doubt from the boys in blue:

Junior-zone_medium

While the officials clearly favor right-handed batters, the substantive effect is rather small. Assuming a batter sees around 20 pitches over the course of the game, 10 of which are called, even an exceptionally advantaged batter such as Andrus would see an extra ball every fifteen games or so. Not for nothing—biases notwithstanding—but the umps do a pretty good job of getting it right, or at least making up for their bad calls with more bad calls that go the other way.

Next week I'll cover the batters who haven't had it so easy—also known as lefties. I'll also post any reader requests from this week and last week. If there's a batter or a pitcher you'd like me to take a closer look at, just go ahead and ask in the comments.

Data originate from Darrell Zimmerman's SQL-based PitchFX database.

Comment 6 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Interesting

Even if it’s only 3 or 4 runs worth of value separating the most advantaged from the most victimized players. Do these correlate strongly from year to year for the hitters?

by psiogen on Dec 1, 2010 1:28 PM EST reply actions  

Is it even 3-4 runs?

In terms of individual hitter year-to-year correlations: no. As I explained in this post and others, the zone is a function of things largely exogenous to batter skill. I’m using certain players here to demonstrate those effects, not to claim that the batters themselves were responsible for the zone.

Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.

by J-Doug on Dec 1, 2010 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, just because something's not a skill doesn't mean it's not persistent

If being a lefty is inherently disadvantageous, it could be that, say, having a certain type of batting stance also hurts you with umpires year after year. But if you say it’s ain’t so, I believe you.

Re “3-4 runs”: You implied that a very advantaged hitter would see 10 extra balls over the course of 150 games, and presumably a very disadvantaged hitter might see 10 extra strikes. A difference of 20 strike calls over a season should be around 3 runs, right? (My memory could be off, but I thought a strike vs. a ball was about 1/6 of an expected run.)

by psiogen on Dec 8, 2010 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

You could be right on the math, I was actually asking not doubting. I really don't remember.

As for year-to-year correlation, perhaps I’m missing your point. What I’m saying is that the distribution of bias across players seems to be random at the season level, and that for most players there does not seem to be any favoritism independent of the variables I’ve included in the model.

Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.

by J-Doug on Dec 8, 2010 4:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Also, not sure ball vs. strike is the right comparo

The Zone Advantage formula measures (errant strikes / called pitches) – (errant balls / called pitches). So shouldn’t the comparison be called strike vs. all other possible outcomes (ball, hit, foul, swinging strike)?

Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.

by J-Doug on Dec 8, 2010 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz