Benefit of the Doubt: Relievers Who Get the Wide Zone
Okay, to be honest, it wasn't my original plan to write this post. My first idea was for a generic PitchFX analysis similar to my examinations of Barry Zito and Stephen Strasburg from earlier this year. My goal was to find pitch-level data that would explain the (nearly) ageless Mariano Rivera's "decline" from 2009 to 2010. However, when I plotted his strike zone data, I noticed something that I hadn't noticed before: home plate umpires are really—and I mean really—offering Mo a wide strike zone.

The images above plot Mariano Rivera's pitches (balls in blue, called strikes in red) against the rulebook-defined strike zone (in green) during the 2009 and 2010 seasons. The strike zone that umpires call specifically for Mariano Rivera appears in white. Now, it's not news that the called zone differs significantly from the rulebook zone, or that righties get the outside corner against lefties. What's striking is how different Mo's strike zone is from the typical zone.
The chart above represents a random sample of 5000 pitches drawn from a larger population of called pitches thrown by right-handed pitchers in the 9th inning or later from 2009-2010. As you can see, the ellipses defining the umpires' zones are far more regular, and a bit more faithful to the rulebook zone.
Exactly how helpful has Mo's extra-wide zone been? To answer this, I counted all the balls and called strikes that PitchFX didn't agree with, divided those numbers by the total number of called pitches, and subtracted the ratio of supposedly errant balls from the ratio of supposedly errant strikes. According to these data, Rivera earned about 7.5 additional non-PitchFX-approved strikes for every 100 called (equal to every ~200 he threw).
That's not a trivial advantage, nor is it a common one: Rivera's net called pitch advantage is third best among all pitchers who threw at least 500 pitches since 2009, second best among relievers, and 1.61 standard deviations above the mean. Who did even better according to PitchFX? None other than The Bearded One: Brian Wilson, closer for the 2010 World Series Champs.

Note that against lefties, Wilson's zone is actually rather close to the typical late-inning zone for right-handed pitchers. Against righties, however, it's a different story. Much like Rivera, Wilson gets both the outside corner against lefties and the inside corner against righties. That advantage earns him 8.9 additional strikes per 100 pitches called, a full 1.91 standard deviations above the mean.
The Ageless Wonder and the Bearded Wonder aren't the only pitchers to benefit from a big zone over the last two years, nor is this advantage solely confined to right-handed power closers with pinpoint control. Below is a list of all the pitchers (min. 500 called pitches thrown) whose zone advantage was at least one standard deviation above the mean during 2009-2010:
| Pitcher | Called Pitches | Balls in Question | Strikes in Question | Zone Advantage | Standard Deviations |
| Hernandez, Livan | 3,351 | 150 | 460 | 9.3% | 1.98 |
| Wilson, Brian | 1,384 | 64 | 187 | 8.9% | 1.90 |
| Rivera, Mariano | 1,030 | 59 | 136 | 7.5% | 1.61 |
| Lowe, Derek | 3,244 | 101 | 328 | 7.0% | 1.52 |
| Nathan, Joe | 597 | 28 | 67 | 6.5% | 1.42 |
| Street, Huston | 702 | 32 | 77 | 6.4% | 1.40 |
| Weathers, David | 563 | 20 | 56 | 6.4% | 1.39 |
| Hoffman, Trevor | 682 | 41 | 83 | 6.2% | 1.35 |
| Howell, J.P. | 625 | 47 | 85 | 6.1% | 1.33 |
| Martin, J.D. | 935 | 68 | 124 | 6.0% | 1.31 |
| Vazquez, Javier | 2,790 | 140 | 302 | 5.8% | 1.27 |
| Peavy, Jake | 1,562 | 125 | 215 | 5.8% | 1.26 |
| Soriano, Rafael | 952 | 47 | 101 | 5.7% | 1.25 |
| Rhodes, Arthur | 811 | 46 | 92 | 5.7% | 1.25 |
| Bell, Heath | 1,258 | 74 | 142 | 5.4% | 1.19 |
| Moyer, Jamie | 2,262 | 118 | 239 | 5.3% | 1.18 |
| Takahashi, Hisanori | 819 | 35 | 77 | 5.1% | 1.13 |
| Uehara, Koji | 769 | 44 | 81 | 4.8% | 1.07 |
| Betancourt, Rafael | 711 | 48 | 82 | 4.8% | 1.06 |
| Herrera, Daniel Ray | 769 | 38 | 73 | 4.6% | 1.02 |
| Moehler, Brian | 1,700 | 104 | 180 | 4.5% | 1.00 |
A motley crew they are, indeed. What links them all together? According to statistical analysis I'll be presenting later in this series, umpires expand their zone when the pitcher keeps his velocity down, pitches late in the ballgame, keeps runners off base, delivers with a high positive vertical spin deflection,* and happens to be a righty facing a lefty.
*In English, this means that the spin applied to the pitch causes it to reach the plate higher in the zone than we would expect if we ignored the interaction between aerodynamic drag and the rotation of the ball.
Very few of the pitchers listed above share all of these characteristics. For instance, Mo and Wilson tend to have positive vertical pitch deflection, face more lefties than average, get through their outs quickly and pitch late in the ballgame. Wilson also tends to pitch with more runners on base than average, but Mo does not. Neither of them are known for keeping their velocity down.
But take a look at the starters that top the list: Derek Lowe and Livan Hernandez.* These two journeymen are both known for their ability to get by with low velocity pitches. Same goes for Trevor Hoffman and J.P. Howell, the most fortunate lefty on the list.
*Speaking of Livan Hernandez, I remember quite well the first pitch he threw in Washington. It was memorable because it was the first pitch at home in the history of the Nationals. It was so far off the plate it had a chance to hit President Bush in the stands. It was called a strike. It all makes sense now.
We'll talk more about starters next week as this series continues, but I'll conclude this post by bringing it back to Mo. It's obvious that the 2010 model Sandman was a bit off compared to the 2009 edition, although still extremely effective. Well, perhaps his decline in quality hurt his strike zone or vice versa: between 2009 and 2010, his zone advantage dropped from 8.9 strikes to 4.7 strikes per 100 pitches called. Brian Wilson's, on the other hand, grew from 8.5 to 9.4.
Now that's the kind of advantage I'd like to have in the World Series.
Note: Can't believe that I was remiss in noting this earlier. This data comes from Darrell Zimmerman's SQL-based PitchFX database.
19 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is outstanding, j-doug.
The baseball season doesn't have to end! Create your own players, coach your own teams, and join your friends in THE premier baseball MMO. Two Out Rally opens October 25th!
Two Out Rally, BASEBALL MMORPG | Facebook | @2OutRally
Thanks!
I’ve been sitting on this script to draw strike zones for months—figure I might as well do something with it.
Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.
Great post!
I have been considering this concept for a while. On the leaderboard, I noticed that many of the pitchers are established veterans. Might that have something to do with getting extra calls?
by Lucas Apostoleris on Nov 10, 2010 11:34 AM EST reply actions
I've thought about that too...
It’s easier to just run the data against the other data in the PFX database, but that’s something I’ll definitely be digging into later on.
Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.
Yes, pretty much the opposite of those who did well.
I didn’t specifically look at pitch type because break and speed get at most of that. I’ll be covering the guys who got screwed in a couple of posts after I deal with the starters who did well.
Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.
This is really interesting
I’m curious about why some pitchers get this advantage over others and whether or not this advantage is consistent over time. In other words, do the same pitchers get the same sort of advantage year after year?
Yes and no.
There is notable variation in year-to-year zone data, but a lot of that may be sample size and a lot of that may be actual improvements/declines in pitcher metrics that are correlated with a zone advantage.
Mo’s decline from 2009-2010 was one of the worst, however, among pitchers who threw at least 250 pitches in both years.
Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.
I find that all of these studies using the pitch f/x data shows that
the umpire’s strike zone is very much circular even though the rulebook calls for a box zone.
Also, is the circle/ellipses self drawn or made by a regression model?
Fuzz
To be fair,
umpires don’t have square eyes.
The baseball season doesn't have to end! Create your own players, coach your own teams, and join your friends in THE premier baseball MMO. Two Out Rally opens October 25th!
Two Out Rally, BASEBALL MMORPG | Facebook | @2OutRally
by Justin Bopp on Nov 10, 2010 12:49 PM EST up reply actions
Good points...
It’s not just the studies that show this, it’s a naked-eye observation of the actual data: there are clearly more balls called at the corners and strikes called on the sides. Based on this, people who attempt to draw a strike zone assume that it’s an ellipse. It’s not a perfect ellipse in reality, at least not a perfectly balanced ellipse, but it’s more an ellipse than a rectangle or a pentagonal prism.
The zone as drawn is based on a kernel-smoothing function. I basically plot the densities of balls and called strikes both vertically and horizontally. Where the densities of strikes and balls are equal, that defines the outer boundary of that part of the strike zone.
Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.
Of note:
I see Hisanori Takahashi on the list….the vast majority of pitches for him are likely to be change-ups that are ALWAYS aimed away and low from right handed batters. But his pitch has a lot of horizontal movement, so one might wonder if umps are calling the pitch early (while its still over the plate) while it really darts away from right-handed batters
The round zone
The reason for the round or elliptical strike zone (rather than a square one) is simple. If a pitch is on or near the corner it is close to being a ball in two dimensions, so umpires tend to call them balls more often. Balls on the edges of the zone but not at the corners of the “box” are only close to being balls in one dimension, so umpires tend to call them strikes more often.
For example, which one do you think is more likely to be called a ball – a pitch that is low AND away, or a pitch that is away but thigh high?
Mathematically, it works like this: When a pitch comes in, an umpire, subconsciously of course, has to make a determination as to the probability of it being in the zone in two dimensions. If a pitch is borderline (50/50) on the corners (of the box), the umpire will only call it a strike 25% of the time (.5 * .5). If it is on the edge of the zone but not near the corner of the box, it gets called a strike 50% of the time.
That is why you get a roundish strike zone. There may be other reasons, but that is the primary one, by far.
You can stop slapping your head now…
by mgl on Nov 11, 2010 2:10 AM EST reply actions 3 recs
yes
if you throw darts at a square dartboard, your distribution will be elliptical (round) as well. Although since pitchers aim (?) at the corners I would not be surprised if there were some distortions.
Brian Sabean: Sing His Praises To The Heavens!
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game that seems to have resurrected itself in my absence...
Here's my look at "mis-called" pitches by different bucketing factors from 2008
http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2008/4/24/459913/a-strike-is-a-strike-right
One thing I’d be wary of in your analysis is that everyone is within 2 SDs of the mean, which is well within the range of variation we’d expect simple due to randomness.
I’m assuming your later articles demonstrate the correlation to the velocity, spin deflation, etc. I’m definitely interested in seeing the results.
Nice work.
by Dan Turkenkopf on Nov 11, 2010 11:07 AM EST reply actions
Thanks Dan, definitely a fan of that post.
Yes the SDs are small, but they’d be larger if I were looking at the whole population rather than using a 500 pitch cutoff. The data will be up in the future.
Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.
Very good work, thanks!
As a Giants fan, I definitely thought Wilson got a pretty wide outside zone in the playoffs. I had no idea he had any such advantage during the regular season. I’d like to mention that, from my personal observation, he seemed to hit the glove with almost every pitch. I wonder if that can be recorded/measured.
Someone throwing 96-99 exactly where they want is advantage enough… give him an inch or two off the plate and he’s unhittable.
Eugenio Velez: Really fast... at getting picked off. SICK BURN!!
I believe there's some work on pitcher framing in the latest Hardball Times Annual
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/its-the-hardball-times-2010-annual/
Blogger and Editor, Rational Pastime Blog. Twitter: @RationalPastime.
I think Nick (vivaelpujols) was writing that section
I’m lax on picking up my copy. Waiting to see whether Amazon drops the price on the Kindle and then buying a bunch of stuff at once (or maybe asking for the book for Xmas)
by Dan Turkenkopf on Nov 24, 2010 4:34 PM EST up reply actions

by 


























