Was the 1975 Red's Lineup the Best Ever as Joe Posnanski Claims in His New Book: "The Machine"?

Joe Posnanski recently released his book, "The Machine", on the 1975 Cincinnati Reds with specific emphasis on the lineup. I will let Joe describe, as he does best, the Reds lineup in his article about the book on cnnsi.com:
There had never been a lineup quite like it. Yes, the famed 1927 New York Yankees had four Hall of Famers in their Murderers' Row -- including Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig -- and averaged more than six runs per game. The Boys of Summer Brooklyn Dodgers of the 1950s had Jackie Robinson, Duke Snider, Pee Wee Reese and Roy Campanella and were a beautiful blend of power and speed. But the lineup Sparky Anderson put on the field on July 4, 1975, had something more. The Reds had power and speed too. More, though, there were three African-Americans in the lineup, three Latin Americans and two white Americans -- and Bench had Native American blood. They were the Great American Ballclub.
To find the quality of players on the teams mentioned, I decided to use Rally's WAR rankings to see how the 1975 Reds stood up to the 1927 Yankees and the 1955 Brooklyn Dodgers. To make the comparison I added the lifetime WAR of all the players on the teams and here are the results:
| 1927 Yankees | 1955 Dodgers | 1975 Reds | |
| Hitting – All Player's WAR | 422 | 379 | 420 |
| Pitching – All Players WAR | 175 | 187 | 111 |
| Total WAR | 597 | 566 | 531 |
| Hitting – Negative WAR players removed | 435 | 404 | 462 |
| Pitching – Negative WAR players removed | 179 | 189 | 113 |
| Total WAR | 614 | 593 | 575 |
I removed the players with negative for an additional comparison because most of these players were only on the team for a short time and could subtract from greatness of the teams.
The 1975 Reds, when compared to these 2 teams, has about the same level of offense as the 1927 Yankees, but is better once the negative players are removed. The Red's pitching staff is the worst of the three with them accumulating 77 less wins than the 1955 Dodgers. When the totals for the hitters and pitchers are added up, the 75 Reds are last of the three in total WAR.
Here are the team's players that accumulated more that had more than 10 WAR in their lifetime:
| Yankees | Lifetime WAR | Dodgers | Lifetime WAR | Reds | Lifetime WAR |
| Babe Ruth (h) | 172 | Duke Snider | 68 | Joe Morgan | 104 |
| Lou Gehrig | 118 | Pee Wee Reese | 67 | Pete Rose | 75 |
| Tony Lazzeri | 48 | Jackie Robinson | 63 | Johnny Bench | 71 |
| Urban Shocker | 47 | Sandy Koufax | 55 | Tony Perez | 51 |
| Waite Hoyt | 47 | Gil Hodges | 45 | George Foster | 43 |
| Earle Combs | 45 | Jim Gilliam | 39 | Dave Concepcion | 34 |
| Bob Shawkey | 40 | Roy Campanella | 36 | Ken Griffey | 32 |
| Herb Pennock | 37 | Carl Furillo | 35 | Gary Nolan | 27 |
| Bob Meusel | 24 | Don Newcombe | 30 | Dan Driessen | 20 |
| Dutch Ruether | 20 | Johnny Podres | 27 | Merv Rettenmund | 19 |
| Babe Ruth (p) | 18 | Don Hoak | 20 | Fred Norman | 18 |
| George Pipgras | 10 | Carl Erskine | 17 | Clay Carroll | 17 |
| Roger Craig | 17 | Don Gullett | 17 | ||
| Russ Meyer | 11 | Clay Kirby | 11 | ||
| Clem Labine | 10 | Cesar Geronimo | 11 |
All I can say is that damn Ruth was great. His lifetime combined WAR of 190 is only 8 less than that of Duke Snider, Pee Wee Reese and Jackie Robinson's total (198 WAR).
Using lifetime WAR of the players as an comparison, the other two teams JoPo brings up are better overall, but the Red's lineup in 1975 can be debated as the best of the three.
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
Is comparing the Lifetime WAR fair when he's only using the 1975 season?
"What we do in life, echoes in eternity!"
by Justin Bopp on Sep 17, 2009 4:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd prefer to see only one year as well
Also, did the negative players that were removed have a lifetime negative WAR of just negative for that year?
by JBrew on Sep 17, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the obvious problem with focusing on a single year is that he'd have to pick a single year for the yankees and dodgers to compare to as well.
"What we do in life, echoes in eternity!"
by Justin Bopp on Sep 17, 2009 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here are the answers to JBrew and your questions
I looked at lifetime numbers (JBrew – negative lifetime WAR) because if I only looked at that season, but several factors discouraged me.
1. The numbers were pretty close, less than one WAR between Brooklyn and Cincinnati. I want to encompass more of the overall/lifetime talent on that team.
2. The quality of competition/schedule can really come into effect
Here are the rankings of the 3 three teams when compared to teams since 1900:
Rank/Team/Year/Hitter WAR
3 NYA 1927 46.6
14 BRO 1955 40.3
19 CIN 1975 39.4
The main problem I actually have is that the Reds played 162 games and the Yankees 155. I have a piece coming out looking at set WAR per PA. Here are the numbers for teams per season when adjusted to 6000 PA
Rank/Team/Year/Hitter WAR
3 NYA 1927 46.46
9 BRO 1955 40.93
32 CIN 1975 37.48
Jeff Zimmerman - Protecting the world from RBI's and Wins from my mom's guest house.
by Jeff Zimmerman (TucsonRoyal) on Sep 17, 2009 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t tell Joe Morgan.
I still believe in Ryan Garko...........
by 49er16 on Sep 17, 2009 7:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why use 55 Dodgers team?
They were worse offensively than the 53 team that did not win the WS. And there are several other teams that did not win the WS that had better offenses than the 75 Reds.
by Buzzy on Sep 18, 2009 9:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Because JoPo uses a World Series-winning team as a benchmark?
"What we do in life, echoes in eternity!"
by Justin Bopp on Sep 18, 2009 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
?
He only says things like “The Dodgers of the 50s…” but it is widely known that the 55 team was almost (offensively) washed up, and was worse than the 53 team offensively speaking.
by Buzzy on Sep 21, 2009 2:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 









BtB on Facebook

















