BtB Power Rankings: Through Wednesday, September 9th, 2009
Welcome to our weekly ranking of all the MLB teams! In this ranking, we use aggregate team hitting, baserunning, pitching, and fielding statistics--not team wins, losses, runs scored, or runs allowed--to evaluate the performance of teams to date. You can think of the estimated winning percentage (eW%) below as how we'd expect things to fall out if we threw teams with these aggregate statistics into one big league and let them battle it out for thousands of games. They don't replace your actual standings, but they give you something different to consider when thinking about team performances.
The table is sortable if you click in the header. All data are park-adjusted when possible. A legend is below the table, followed by commentary.
Beyond The Boxscore Power Rankings
| Rank | Chg | Team | wOBA | wRC | BRR | eRS | tERA | tRns | Fld | eRA | eW%lg | LgAdj | eW% |
| 1 | 0 | NYA | 0.363 | 847 | -6 | 841 | 4.34 | 656 | 7.3 | 649 | 0.620 | 17.5 | 0.641 |
| 2 | 0 | TB | 0.348 | 734 | 5 | 739 | 4.42 | 656 | 38.3 | 617 | 0.589 | 17.4 | 0.613 |
| 3 | 0 | BOS | 0.345 | 721 | 2 | 723 | 3.94 | 585 | -30.2 | 615 | 0.578 | 17.3 | 0.602 |
| 4 | 0 | COL | 0.334 | 658 | 6 | 664 | 3.57 | 532 | 1.4 | 530 | 0.608 | -17.4 | 0.582 |
| 5 | 0 | LAN | 0.335 | 700 | -7 | 693 | 3.84 | 591 | 25.5 | 565 | 0.588 | -17.5 | 0.562 |
| 6 | +2 | TEX | 0.334 | 656 | -5 | 652 | 4.39 | 648 | 44.2 | 604 | 0.532 | 17.3 | 0.557 |
| 7 | -1 | LAA | 0.350 | 745 | -1 | 744 | 4.73 | 696 | -9.1 | 705 | 0.525 | 17.2 | 0.549 |
| 8 | -1 | TOR | 0.332 | 656 | 9 | 665 | 4.24 | 633 | -10.1 | 643 | 0.522 | 17.3 | 0.548 |
| 9 | 0 | CHA | 0.323 | 620 | -8 | 612 | 3.80 | 569 | -22.4 | 591 | 0.510 | 17.5 | 0.537 |
| 10 | 0 | MIN | 0.336 | 673 | 4 | 678 | 4.42 | 655 | -31.2 | 686 | 0.497 | 17.3 | 0.522 |
| 11 | +6 | STL | 0.332 | 650 | 2 | 652 | 3.98 | 597 | 5.7 | 591 | 0.547 | -17.5 | 0.521 |
| 12 | -1 | PHI | 0.337 | 682 | -4 | 678 | 4.28 | 633 | 20.2 | 613 | 0.544 | -17.0 | 0.519 |
| 13 | +1 | OAK | 0.323 | 596 | 12 | 607 | 4.20 | 625 | -8.7 | 634 | 0.488 | 17.3 | 0.515 |
| 14 | -1 | DET | 0.329 | 623 | 0 | 623 | 4.53 | 663 | 25.2 | 638 | 0.489 | 17.2 | 0.514 |
| 15 | -3 | CLE | 0.338 | 692 | 1 | 694 | 4.71 | 696 | -27.5 | 723 | 0.481 | 17.3 | 0.504 |
| 16 | -1 | ARI | 0.320 | 617 | -4 | 613 | 3.95 | 596 | 22.9 | 573 | 0.527 | -17.5 | 0.500 |
| 17 | -1 | ATL | 0.324 | 633 | -12 | 621 | 3.82 | 570 | -17.2 | 587 | 0.516 | -17.3 | 0.490 |
| 18 | 0 | FLA | 0.337 | 684 | 1 | 685 | 4.33 | 644 | -24.7 | 669 | 0.513 | -17.3 | 0.488 |
| 19 | 0 | CHN | 0.318 | 606 | -15 | 590 | 3.93 | 583 | 1.5 | 581 | 0.495 | -17.2 | 0.469 |
| 20 | 0 | SEA | 0.317 | 574 | -2 | 572 | 4.71 | 707 | 58.5 | 649 | 0.441 | 17.4 | 0.467 |
| 21 | 0 | SF | 0.307 | 515 | 8 | 523 | 3.96 | 593 | 39.6 | 554 | 0.481 | -17.4 | 0.452 |
| 22 | 0 | MIL | 0.332 | 663 | -8 | 655 | 4.85 | 713 | 11.4 | 702 | 0.462 | -17.3 | 0.438 |
| 23 | +1 | KC | 0.312 | 558 | -12 | 546 | 4.13 | 604 | -48.3 | 652 | 0.411 | 17.3 | 0.436 |
| 24 | -1 | BAL | 0.324 | 634 | -21 | 613 | 4.71 | 692 | -33.3 | 725 | 0.409 | 17.3 | 0.433 |
| 25 | 0 | NYN | 0.322 | 596 | 5 | 601 | 4.41 | 647 | -35.5 | 683 | 0.443 | -17.3 | 0.417 |
| 26 | 0 | HOU | 0.320 | 582 | 1 | 582 | 4.41 | 651 | -11.7 | 662 | 0.440 | -17.3 | 0.415 |
| 27 | 0 | WAS | 0.330 | 657 | -8 | 649 | 4.98 | 724 | -25.0 | 749 | 0.426 | -17.3 | 0.403 |
| 28 | 0 | PIT | 0.316 | 565 | -7 | 558 | 4.62 | 670 | 10.5 | 660 | 0.419 | -17.2 | 0.393 |
| 29 | 0 | SD | 0.321 | 609 | -8 | 601 | 4.74 | 714 | -9.9 | 724 | 0.409 | -17.5 | 0.384 |
| 30 | 0 | CIN | 0.304 | 529 | -9 | 519 | 4.58 | 687 | 32.9 | 655 | 0.390 | -17.3 | 0.364 |
Offense
wOBA (park-adjusted, includes BPro's baserunning data)
wRC (wRC from FanGraphs, with baserunning removed, then park adjusted)
BRR (Equivalent Base Running Runs from Baseball Prospectus)
eRS (estimated runs scored) = wRC + BRR
Defense
Pitching = tERA and tRns are a home-brew version of Graham MacAree's statistic.
Fielding = Fld: average of bUZR (from FanGraphs) and THT's batted balls statistic (converted to runs)
eRA (estimated runs allowed) = Pitching - Fielding
The Rest
eW%lg = estimated winning percentage within the specific league (AL or NL). Compare this to true winning %!
LgAdj = league adjustment (bonus to AL teams, penalty to NL teams, because the AL has superior level of play)
eW% = estimated winning percentage if all teams were in one league (after league adjustment)
Methods provided in more detail in the first post in this series
American LeagueTeam Leaders (asterisks indicate teams improving in specific ranking):
Offense (wOBA): Yankees, Angels*, Rays National League American League: E=Yankees, C=White Sox, W=Rangers*, WC=Rays
Pitching (tERA): White Sox, Red Sox, Royals*
Fielding (Fld): Mariners, Rangers, Rays
Offense (wOBA): Marlins*, Phillies, Dodgers
Pitching (tERA): Rockies, Braves*, Dodgers
Fielding (Fld): Giants, Reds, Dodgers"On Paper" Playoff Leaders (asterisks indicate new leaders):
National League: E=Phillies, C=Cardinals, W=Rockies, WC=Dodgers
This Week's Movers
Two stories this week in power ranking land. First, St. Louis has been rolling, winning 25 of their last 31. Even though only six of those games have been won by 4 runs or more, they've been shooting up our charts. Last week, they took over the NL Central. This week, they shot up six slots and are now ranked as the third-best team in the National league, behind only the Rockies and Dodgers. In part due to the relative paucity of competition in the NL Central, they now have the largest actual-games division lead of any team in baseball. The Cardinals are going to the playoffs!
On a personal note, I got a chance to see the Cardinals last Saturday at the Baseball Prospectus event at PNC park. It was something of a disappointment at first--Pujols, Holliday, and Molina were all given the day off. But a well-pitched game by Ross Ohlendorf and an equally competitive outing by Mitchell Boggs sent a 1-1 game into extra innings. At that point, Pujols pinch hit in the top of the 10th. That guy's really good at baseball.
Second, the Rangers rode an 8-2 stretch to edge in front of the Angels, at least on paper. Texas currently faces a 4.5 game deficit, which will be hard to overcome with less than a month to play. But I wouldn't count them out just yet.
0 recs |
5 comments
|
Comments
Do my eyes deceive me, or do the Marlins lead the National League in wOBA?
Well, tied with the Phillies at least. I have to say, I’m shocked, and I watch the team. But I guess if you post five guys over .340 wOBA in your starting lineup, playing in a slight pitcher’s park, you’re going to get a good adjusted team wOBA.
Justin, what’s the park factor for the Marlins?
by SFiercex4 on Sep 10, 2009 10:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
PF = 0.98
Vs. Phillies at 1.02, Denver at 1.09, Dodgers at 0.98.
-j
My blog: Basement-Dwellers.com
Also: Beyond the Boxscore
Twittering: @jinazreds
by JinAZ on Sep 11, 2009 7:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Does the Fielding Metric take in account Catcher's Defense?
by FlimtotheFlam on Sep 11, 2009 11:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No
I’m pretty sure we went through that before. At this time, no defense is included. So, if you like with the Cardinals, subtract another 5 or 10 runs allowed for Molina (and maybe add back a little with LaRue).
…you know, it probably is about time that I went ahead and added catcher fielding into the dataset. It’s easy enough to do, and will just require a few extra web queries and a pivot table or two. I even have a spreadsheet that does this from my WAR stuff. I’ll see if I can make it happen for next week.
-j
My blog: Basement-Dwellers.com
Also: Beyond the Boxscore
Twittering: @jinazreds
by JinAZ on Sep 11, 2009 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
^^ "no CATCHER defense is included
My blog: Basement-Dwellers.com
Also: Beyond the Boxscore
Twittering: @jinazreds
by JinAZ on Sep 11, 2009 2:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs













BtB on Facebook















