Beyond the Box Score: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: The Record of Wrongs: Vanderbilt Commodores

BtB Power Rankings: Through Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

The Phillies have fallen out of first place (on paper)!  Will Pedro Martinez get them back on top? (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)

More photos » Charles Rex Arbogast - AP

The Phillies have fallen out of first place (on paper)! Will Pedro Martinez get them back on top? (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)

Welcome to our weekly ranking of all the MLB teams!  In this ranking, we use aggregate team hitting, pitching, and fielding statistics--not team wins, losses, runs scored, or runs allowed--to evaluate the performance of teams to date.  You can think of the estimated winning percentage (eW%) below as how we'd expect things to fall out if we threw teams with these aggregate statistics into one big league and let them battle it out for thousands of games.  They don't replace your actual standings, but they give you something different to consider when thinking about teams to date.

The table is sortable if you click in the header.  All data are park-adjusted when possible.  A legend is below the table, followed by commentary. There is also a table comparing actual vs. expected run scored and run allowed totals, as well as actual vs. expected winning percentages.

BtB Power Rankings

Rank Chg Team wOBA eRS tERA tRns Fld eRA eW%lg LgAdj eW%
1 +1 NYA 0.363 676 4.45 548 3.2 544 0.606 14.2 0.628
2 -1 TB 0.351 621 4.43 537 28.8 508 0.595 14.2 0.619
3 0 BOS 0.340 573 3.89 472 -25.0 497 0.567 14.1 0.592
4 0 LAN 0.337 584 3.91 493 18.3 474 0.597 -14.3 0.572
5 0 TOR 0.332 548 4.18 513 7.8 505 0.539 14.1 0.564
6 +1 COL 0.328 519 3.57 432 2.7 430 0.586 -14.2 0.559
7 -1 CHA 0.324 505 3.81 465 -10.0 475 0.528 14.3 0.555
8 +1 TEX 0.331 515 4.37 523 32.1 491 0.522 13.9 0.548
9 -1 LAA 0.351 604 4.85 580 3.4 577 0.522 13.9 0.545
10 +5 ARI 0.323 519 3.83 478 12.5 465 0.551 -14.3 0.524
11 0 CLE 0.341 580 4.70 566 -18.4 584 0.496 14.1 0.520
12 0 ATL 0.327 525 3.82 469 -10.6 480 0.542 -14.2 0.516
13 0 MIN 0.336 557 4.53 547 -22.9 570 0.489 14.1 0.513
14 -4 PHI 0.338 562 4.44 537 14.4 523 0.534 -13.8 0.510
15 -1 DET 0.327 507 4.57 549 11.8 537 0.473 14.1 0.498
16 +1 OAK 0.319 490 4.16 509 -10.9 520 0.472 14.2 0.498
17 -1 CHN 0.317 488 4.04 491 8.0 483 0.504 -13.9 0.478
18 +1 STL 0.325 513 4.12 509 -6.8 516 0.498 -14.4 0.471
19 +1 SEA 0.317 478 4.72 580 41.3 538 0.445 14.2 0.471
20 +1 FLA 0.330 537 4.39 539 -12.7 551 0.487 -14.2 0.462
21 -3 BAL 0.324 506 4.63 558 -24.6 583 0.433 14.2 0.458
22 0 SF 0.304 420 3.89 473 36.3 437 0.482 -14.2 0.453
23 0 KC 0.314 457 4.13 493 -42.9 535 0.427 14.1 0.453
24 0 MIL 0.331 534 4.87 581 9.7 571 0.468 -14.1 0.444
25 +3 HOU 0.324 506 4.41 540 -18.1 558 0.454 -14.2 0.429
26 -1 NYN 0.323 502 4.39 530 -25.2 556 0.452 -14.2 0.427
27 0 WAS 0.334 550 4.94 591 -22.3 614 0.447 -14.2 0.424
28 -2 PIT 0.316 467 4.59 547 17.8 530 0.442 -14.1 0.416
29 0 SD 0.319 488 4.64 573 -13.8 587 0.413 -14.3 0.388
30 0 CIN 0.301 417 4.61 560 15.6 545 0.379 -14.1 0.353

Star-divide

Offense = wOBA (park-corrected), eRS (estimated runs scored; wRC from FanGraphs, then park adjusted)
Pitching = tERA and tRns are a home-brew version of Graham MacAree's statistic.
Fielding = Fld: average of bUZR (from FanGraphs) and THT's batted balls statistic (converted to runs)
eRA (estimated runs allowed) = Pitching - Fielding
eW%lg = estimated winning percentage within the specific league (AL or NL)
LgAdj = league adjustment (bonus to AL teams, penalty to NL teams, because the AL has superior level of play)
eW% = estimated winning percentage if all teams were in one league (after league adjustment)
Methods provided in more detail in the first post in this series

Team Leaders (asterisks indicate teams improving in specific ranking):

American League
Offense (wOBA): Yankees, Angels*, Rays
Pitching (tERA): White Sox*, Red Sox, Royals
Fielding (Fld): Mariners*, Rangers, Rays

National League
Offense (wOBA): Phillies*, Dodgers, Nationals
Pitching (tERA): Rockies, Braves, Diamondbacks
Fielding (Fld): Giants, Dodgers*, Pirates

"On Paper" Playoff Leaders (asterisks indicate new leaders):

American League: E=Yankees*, C=White Sox, W=Rangers*, WC=Rays
National League: E=Braves*, C=Cubs, W=Dodgers, WC=Rockies


This Week's Movers

The biggest story is that for the first time since our June 23rd update, we have a new leader in the NL East--at least on paper.  The Phillies had a fairly tough week, losing 6 of their last 10.  Meanwhile, the Braves won 7 of 8, and it's those underlying performances that helped the Braves pull ahead of the Phillies in eW%, 0.516 vs. 0.510.  They make an interesting contrast.  The Phillies have had the best offense in the National League thus far (by wOBA).  The Braves, on the other hand, have had the second-best pitching (by tERA)--behind only the underrated Colorado Rockies staff.  In reality, they're 4.5 games apart--a decent cushion for the Phillies, but I wouldn't be surprised to see that race go down to the wire.

Two other races are tight on paper--the Rays vs. the Yankees and the Angels vs. the Rangers.  The Rays and Yankees have been flopping back and forth on the top of our rankings for about a month now.  They are another interesting combination, in that their pitching is almost equally matched (4.45 vs. 4.43 tERAs).  The Yankees have an edge in offense, while the Rays are the better fielding team.  Unfortunately, the reality for the Rays is that they're a full 10 games back in real life, which makes most of this on-paper stuff kind of irrelevant.  So let's not forget that the pitching-strong Red Sox are holding steady in the #3 slot.  If the Red Sox can get another starter healthy, they could be right back in this.

As for the Angels and Rangers, they continue to bounce back and forth with every update on paper.  Again, it's an interesting combination.  The Rangers have been a pitching and especially defense kind of team, while the Angels have been much more of an offensive club than in recent years.  In the real standings, the Angels have a five-game lead.  If you believe that eW% is starting to get at a team's true talent level, then it may be hard for the Rangers to make up that kind of lead against such an equally-matched team. 


The last team to mention, despite being apparently hopelessly out of it, are the Arizona Diamondbacks.  They finally seem to be putting something together.  Since July 4th, they have gone 20-14, and have slowly been inching up our rankings.  This week marks the biggest improvement I can remember seeing from them, as they surged all the way to 10th in our ranking--one of just three NL teams in the top 10.  Last week, we labeled them the opposites of the 2007 team, which probably overperformed to win its division title.  I can't help but wonder what would have happened this year had Brandon Webb been healthy.

0 recs  |  Comment 20 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Typo:

You have the Sox 3rd overall, not 4th.

I really hope the Sox can put some distance between themselves and the Rays – they scare the crud out of me. Of course, focusing on pulling back into the AL East race would help with that.

Any ideas as to why the Rays are underachieving?

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Aug 13, 2009 3:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

My guess would be the bullpen issues they've had for much of the year.

Bullpens tend to kill projections like Justin’s compared to the actual standings. Damn leverage.

by SFiercex4 on Aug 13, 2009 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Leverage, at least, is blamed

I still haven’t been blown away by a study demonstrating how much this matters.

I’m sure it matters to some degree. Just not sure about the effect size.
-j

by JinAZ on Aug 13, 2009 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow.

The Reds suck. Sorry, Justin. I thought they’d be a 78 win team when the season started. I know they’ve had some injuries, but wow.

godfather of futureredbirds.net

by erik on Aug 13, 2009 4:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

yeah, no crap.

The Reds are currently pounding the heck out of the Nationals right now. I know that because of twitter. Usually, I’m a sucker for a good butt-whooping when it’s in the Reds’ favor. But I can’t bare to even look at this team right now.
-j

by JinAZ on Aug 13, 2009 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Angels: Black Swan of Sabermetrics

So have there been any extensive sabermetric analyses as to why the Angels very often outperform against these more speculative/descriptive evaluations? What do you suspect is the missing data here? Nobody’s luck is this persistent. Angels are 20-9 against the AL East, including recent sweeps against Tampa Bay and NYY, and not by a little.

I admit to following the Angels, but I’m no saber-skeptic. Honestly, what do you think are the blindspots here?

by Turks Teeth on Aug 13, 2009 8:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Bay's still not playing the Monster right (and UZR doesn't get Fenway yet)...

Ells is another UZR case, with some apparent issues with being more cautious (to me, at least).
Lowell is just old.
We’ve had Lugo at SS, and Green’s just starting to make an impact in his numbers, IIRC. Jed’s pretty good, but the wrist is holding him back.
Dusty’s been below normal this year, IIRC.
Youk’s in the same boat as Dusty, and he’s been playing a lot more 3B, which he’s probably below average at.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Aug 13, 2009 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stupid luck

How much will the DBacks have to pay for 2007? I know we didn’t deserve to go to the playoffs then, but this is ridiculous. We’re the 3rd best team in the league using context neutral stats, and yet we’re 10 games below .500.

On the other hand, I’m hoping this balances out next year, and with a healthy Webb and Conor Jackson, we’ll … oh, who am I kidding :(

by paqs on Aug 14, 2009 10:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What wOBA are you using again?

I’ve got the Rockies at .341, not .328 as you do.

Eschew Obfuscation!

by Jeff Aberle on Aug 14, 2009 11:56 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Right

I’m park-correcting the wOBA numbers from FanGraphs. I’m doing it with additive park factors instead of multiplicative park factors. Might not be the best possible way to do it, but it’s a lot easier.

Here’s a link to the additive park factors. Methods work, though Tango countered some of the arguments I was making about this approach being better. It’s actually not, but in practice it doesn’t make that much of a difference.
http://www.basement-dwellers.com/2009/04/player-value-series-part-7-how-should.html
-j

by JinAZ on Aug 14, 2009 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BtB Power Rankings

Why no discussion of the Marlins? They have a better record than the Braves (by a hair). Is it that they don’t conform to your model? Maybe the model is lacking. In any case the deviation should be worth mentioning. They are over-achieving relative to your model by a lot.

by glfcrf on Aug 14, 2009 5:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Make sure you're looking at eW%lg

If you’re comparing true W% to estimated winning percentages, you have to use the eW%lg column because otherwise teams are getting a penalty/bonus for their league difficulty.
-j

by JinAZ on Aug 15, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've talked about the Marlins in the past

Just can’t talk about every team every time. :)

In the Marlins’ case, they come out as slightly “overperforming” on offense. wRC predicts 11 fewer runs scored than they actually have. In truth, though, my “model” has them very close to their straight-up PythagenPat model. Here’s what I have:

True W%: 0.526
Pyth W%: 0.493
eW% lg (without league modifier): 0.487

So what we have here is my rankings essentially agreeing with the straight-up Pythagorean rankings. They’ve been outscored 556 to 548 (after park adjustment) in reality. I just don’t think they’re a contender, at least not with a team like the Phillies.

In contrast, here are the Braves:
True W%: 0.526
Pyth W%: 0.546
eW%lg: 0.542

Very close agreement here.

Phillies:
True W%: 0.568
Pyth W%: 0.563
eW%lg: 0.534

So, if anything, the model is the most skeptical of the Phillies—at least relative to the straight-up PythagenPat. But the Phillies are a much better club these days now that they have Cliff Lee in their rotation.

Hope that helps.
-j

by JinAZ on Aug 15, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?
Start posting on Beyond the Box Score »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

770insig_small
BtB's "Ball On A Budget" Fantasy League - Discuss Participants, Payrolls and Position Eligibility

Recent FanPosts

Ds9_small
good graphing program?
Small
Predicting HR/FB Rates
Leopold_butter_scotch_southpark_small
Troy Tulowitzki vs Ryan Braun
Small
Pitchers batted ball observations
Small
Eric Byrnes: A player worth a look?
Small
Valverde Is Charging Detroit Double
Mukuro_small
Another question: About power rankings
Small
Why You Shouldn't Trade for Arroyo
Jinaz-reds-avatar_small
Last Call for BtB Sabermetric Writing Award Nominations

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Can you spot the five guys NOT in the Hall of Fame? It's easy, I separated 'em for ya. :)

Here's the full post about guys elected to the Hall of Fame primarily for their defense. Guys like Brooks Robinson, Ozzie Smith, Bobby Wallace, John Ward, and Bid McPhee stand up as definite HOFers, with many others worthy of debate (and a couple aren't worth any debate at all).

I almost made it through the whole post without comparing some HOFers to our friends Bill Dahlen, Lou Whitaker, Bobby Grich, Alan Trammell, and Ron Santo. Almost.
If you care about newspaper coverage of MLB, read this post
Visualizing the Difference Between Offensive and Defensive Value for Catchers
First B-Pro and now ESPN. Tommy, you're growing up so fast
THT - Advancing by ground
Negro League Museum Close to Folding
It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one...
Ranking Minor League Systems Using Victors Wang's Prospect Valuations
Pitch f/x on Ricky Nolasco Stretch vs. Windup again
Veron Wells the artist.  I never knew.

http://www.vwellsart.com/

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

BtB on Twitter

Main Feed: @BtBScore

Jeff: @jeffwzimmerman
Steve: @steve_sommer
Sky: @BtB_Sky
Dan: @dturkenk
Harry: @harrypav
Jinaz: @jinazreds
Jack: @jh_moore
Erik: @Erik_Manning
Tommy R: @trancel
Justin: @justinbopp

Subscribe to BtB via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

BtB Goes Social


Managers

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Editors

Rawlings_baseball_bigger_small Dan Turkenkopf

Limes_125_small Sky Kalkman

770insig_small Jeff Zimmerman (TucsonRoyal)

Aviles_small Justin Bopp

Authors

Roots_game_small R.J. Anderson

Jinaz-reds-avatar_small JinAZ

Face_small Harry Pavlidis

1753738656_110919ebe9_o_small vivaelpujols

Ozzie_small erik

Raysring1_small Tommy Rancel

Redcap_small SFiercex4

St_louis_cardinals_ce1141_003263_small stevesommer05

Paige_small Satchel Price