Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

BtB Power Rankings: Through Tuesday, July 7th 2009

Welcome to our weekly ranking of all the MLB teams!  In this ranking, we use aggregate team hitting, pitching, and fielding statistics--not team wins, losses, runs scored, or runs allowed--to evaluate the performance of teams to date.  You can think of the estimated winning percentage (eW%) below as how we'd expect teams to fall out if we threw teams with these aggregate statistics into one big league and let them battle it out for thousands of games.

The table is sortable if you click in the header.  All data are park-adjusted when possible.  A legend is below the table, followed by commentary. There is also a table comparing actual vs. expected run scored and run allowed totals, as well as actual vs. expected winning percentages.  Methods note: as per our discussion last week, I've scaled back the league adjustment a tad--there was a slight amount of double dipping going on.  As you'll see, it doesn't make much of a difference.  The "Chg" column below is based on re-rolled rankings last week vs. this week.

BtB Power Rankings: Through Tuesday, July 7th 2009

Rank Chg Team wOBA eRS tRA tRns Fld eRA eW%lg LgAdj eW%
1 0 TB 0.357 472 4.74 388 22.1 366 0.619 10.5 0.642
2 0 NYA 0.362 491 4.82 399 0.4 398 0.602 10.3 0.624
3 0 BOS 0.341 424 4.18 344 -14.7 358 0.580 10.3 0.604
4 +1 LAN 0.335 415 4.12 346 13.9 332 0.604 -10.3 0.579
5 -1 TOR 0.337 427 4.62 394 8.9 385 0.550 10.6 0.574
6 0 CHA 0.324 363 4.06 330 -3.3 333 0.540 10.3 0.567
7 +4 LAA 0.343 419 5.05 407 -3.5 410 0.510 10.2 0.534
8 +2 TEX 0.334 389 4.98 406 21.0 385 0.506 10.2 0.531
9 0 MIN 0.334 406 4.68 389 -13.0 402 0.505 10.5 0.530
10 -3 COL 0.322 366 3.97 324 -2.0 326 0.554 -10.3 0.526
11 -3 DET 0.328 375 4.81 391 15.8 375 0.500 10.3 0.525
12 +4 PHI 0.342 423 4.97 404 3.4 401 0.526 -10.1 0.502
13 -1 CLE 0.339 427 5.20 430 -21.7 451 0.473 10.5 0.496
14 +1 SEA 0.317 347 4.83 399 21.4 378 0.461 10.3 0.488
15 +7 ATL 0.319 361 4.07 337 -15.3 352 0.511 -10.3 0.484
16 -3 KC 0.314 332 4.32 351 -14.6 365 0.456 10.3 0.483
17 -3 MIL 0.332 393 4.97 404 15.5 388 0.506 -10.3 0.481
18 +1 ARI 0.311 348 4.17 354 8.4 346 0.503 -10.5 0.475
19 +2 STL 0.324 372 4.46 374 1.9 372 0.500 -10.6 0.474
20 -3 BAL 0.327 378 4.83 397 -27.5 424 0.445 10.5 0.470
21 +2 CHN 0.310 331 4.22 342 1.4 340 0.487 -10.1 0.459
22 -4 NYN 0.327 377 4.66 378 -15.1 393 0.481 -10.2 0.455
23 +1 OAK 0.306 316 4.42 361 -9.7 371 0.427 10.2 0.454
24 -4 PIT 0.322 364 4.93 402 21.4 381 0.479 -10.5 0.453
25 0 SF 0.306 313 4.26 348 13.9 334 0.470 -10.3 0.442
26 0 FLA 0.322 373 4.70 397 -14.8 412 0.454 -10.6 0.428
27 0 HOU 0.318 352 4.81 396 -2.7 399 0.440 -10.2 0.415
28 0 CIN 0.309 330 4.88 403 19.7 384 0.431 -10.2 0.405
29 0 WAS 0.327 381 5.28 423 -22.1 445 0.425 -10.1 0.402
30 0 SD 0.317 349 5.07 421 -9.0 430 0.402 -10.3 0.377

Star-divide

Offense = wOBA (park-corrected), eRS (estimated runs scored; wRC from FanGraphs, then park adjusted)
Pitching = tRA and tRns are a home-brew version of Graham MacAree's statistic.
Fielding = Fld: average of bUZR (from FanGraphs) and THT's batted balls statistic (converted to runs)
eRA (estimated runs allowed) = Pitching - Fielding
eW%lg = estimated winning percentage within the specific league (AL or NL)
LgAdj = league adjustment (bonus to AL teams, penalty to NL teams, because the AL has superior level of play)
eW% = estimated winning percentage if all teams were in one league (after league adjustment)
Methods provided in more detail in the first post in this series

Team Leaders (asterisks indicate teams improving in specific ranking):

American League
Offense (wOBA): Yankees*, Rays, Angels*
Pitching (tRA): White Sox, Red Sox*, Royals
Fielding (Fld): Rays, Mariners*, Rangers

National League
Offense (wOBA): Phillies, Dodgers, Brewers
Pitching (tRA): Rockies, Braves, Dodgers
Fielding (Fld): Pirates, Reds, Brewers

"On Paper" Playoff Leaders (asterisks indicate new leaders):

American League: E=Rays, C=White Sox, W=Angels*, WC=Yankees
National League: E=Phillies, C=Brewers, W=Dodgers, WC=Rockies

This Week's Movers:

The Angels moved up four spots, wrested the lead in the AL West while simultaneously appearing for the first time among the AL's top three offenses.  In reality, they've won 10 of their last 14...but unfortunately for The Singing Cowboy's team, 3 of the four losses have come at the hands of the Rangers, who are playing nearly as well.  As a result, they are currently tied in the actual standings--and playing tonight!

The Phillies surged up the rankings this week, largely on the back of their record-breaking ass-kick of my Reds on July 6.  Meanwhile, their principle threat for much of the year--the Mets--are in a freefall, losing 9 of their last 11 and falling to 22nd on our list.  But wait--the Braves surged this week through the 0.500 teams, picking up seven spots and are now just 3 spots behind the Phillies.  The NL East seems as though it's becoming a battle between the Phillies' offense and the Braves' pitching...at least on paper.  In reality, the Marlins are in the mix as well, but our rankings don't think that team has played quite as well as their record indicates: they've scored 20 more runs then their wRC would predict.

Finally, it's worth noting that for the first time in weeks, the top four teams are not all in the AL East!  The Dodgers crept up a notch to 4th overall behind the again-slumping Blue Jays, who have gone 2-6 against their own division over the past 8 games.  Meanwhile, the Yankees are hot-hot-hot (again) and picked up some of the gains the Rays made last week in the rankings.

 

Actual vs Expected Performances

Below are actual vs expected winning percentages, runs scored, and runs allowed.  When a team's ranking deviates substantially from their actual performance (e.g. the Giants or Marlins), this table will hopefully help you see why.

Rank Team eW%lg PythW% TrueW% TrueRS ExpRS TrueRA ExpRA
1 TB 0.619 0.589 0.536 457 472 379 366
2 NYA 0.602 0.577 0.590 467 491 399 398
3 BOS 0.580 0.587 0.602 415 424 345 358
4 LAN 0.604 0.619 0.639 414 415 319 332
5 TOR 0.550 0.540 0.506 411 427 377 385
6 CHA 0.540 0.509 0.518 361 363 354 333
7 LAA 0.510 0.533 0.561 435 419 407 410
8 TEX 0.506 0.538 0.561 399 389 368 385
9 MIN 0.505 0.531 0.512 399 406 374 402
10 COL 0.554 0.539 0.530 379 366 349 326
11 DET 0.500 0.522 0.542 396 375 378 375
12 PHI 0.526 0.546 0.531 424 423 385 401
13 CLE 0.473 0.464 0.393 433 427 466 451
14 SEA 0.461 0.472 0.518 339 347 361 378
15 ATL 0.511 0.486 0.482 348 361 359 352
16 KC 0.456 0.417 0.434 328 332 393 365
17 MIL 0.506 0.502 0.518 387 393 385 388
18 ARI 0.503 0.451 0.417 350 348 390 346
19 STL 0.500 0.532 0.541 385 372 359 372
20 BAL 0.445 0.431 0.440 391 378 451 424
21 CHN 0.487 0.507 0.506 324 331 319 340
22 NYN 0.481 0.464 0.476 355 377 383 393
23 OAK 0.427 0.446 0.427 350 316 393 371
24 PIT 0.479 0.499 0.452 370 364 371 381
25 SF 0.470 0.558 0.554 342 313 300 334
26 FLA 0.454 0.474 0.506 393 373 415 412
27 HOU 0.440 0.456 0.488 344 352 379 399
28 CIN 0.431 0.446 0.500 331 330 373 384
29 WAS 0.425 0.379 0.296 350 381 452 445
30 SD 0.402 0.375 0.422 346 349 451 430

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

Comments

Display:

Programming Note

The Power Rankings are going on vacation to Ocean City for a week starting this Saturday, so they and I will be back on or about July 22nd. :)
-j

by JinAZ on Jul 8, 2009 9:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Does this account for teams having played uneven numbers of games?

OverTheMonster - ALLERGEN WARNING: May contain peanut butter.

by bdalebs on Jul 8, 2009 11:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes, mostly

The winning percentage is calculated by comparing runs scored and runs allowed. That’s irrelevant to the games played, unless you want to go from winning percentage to expected number of wins.

The league adjustment is specific to games played, though. That’s why everyone doesn’t have the same adjustment.

The only thing that isn’t specific to the games played is that there’s no recognition that some teams have played a tougher schedule than others (within leagues). Someday, I’m sure we’ll get strength of schedule adjustments in…just not yet.
-j

by JinAZ on Jul 9, 2009 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kinda what I was asking.

That, and if two good teams are scoring/allowing runs at the same rate, and one team plays more games, the Pythag records would favor the team with more games, right?

OverTheMonster - ALLERGEN WARNING: May contain peanut butter.

by bdalebs on Jul 10, 2009 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wait, these don't use Pythag.

My bad. I really need to go to bed.

OverTheMonster - ALLERGEN WARNING: May contain peanut butter.

by bdalebs on Jul 10, 2009 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Giants...

have the sixth best record in the majors and yet are 25th? Let’s be real. This system is a little hitting heavy. Pitching and defense should not be underrated.

by BucksForever on Jul 9, 2009 12:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Hey, it'd make the Rays and MFY look worse.

DO IT!!!

OverTheMonster - ALLERGEN WARNING: May contain peanut butter.

by bdalebs on Jul 9, 2009 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Whoa whoa whoa! Pitching and defense are there, man!

But seriously, what makes you think we’ve underrated pitching and defense here?

Regarding the difference between win-loss record and ranking, this system purposely ignores record and tries to find ways to measure context-neutral performance. I.e. “how well have these teams played so far?” We’re aware real wins matter in the standings and nobody’s saying wins don’t matter. But you can ask different questions, too, which is what Justin’s done here.

by Sky Kalkman on Jul 9, 2009 8:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Pitching and fielding account for roughly 50% of a team's success in these rankings

After estimating runs scored and runs allowed, we just use pythagenpat to estimate winning percentage.

Pitching-heavy teams can do well in this system. The White Sox are a nice example of this. The problem is that you can’t do just offense or just defense and do well. That’s part of the Giants’ problem.

The other problem the Giants have is that they’ve probably been a bit “lucky.” Their offensive runs scored estimates come in 34 runs below their actual total. And their pitching+fielding runs allowed estimate comes in 29 higher than their actual total. As a result, these rankings indicate that they’ve actually played more poorly than their record would indicate.

The Giants’ other problem is that they play in the NL, which features a lower level of competition than the AL. You can’t just look at winning percentage across leagues and argue that a win is a win (well, you can, but you shouldn’t). The same team would do better in the NL than the AL because competition in the NL is weaker.
-j

by JinAZ on Jul 9, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Giants watch:

Yikes, their slow, but powerful surge to the top has hit a stand still.

by Sky Kalkman on Jul 9, 2009 3:37 PM EDT reply actions  

I was surprised too, they had a pretty good week, outscoring their opponents 34-25. But, I guess it’s not about RS vs. RA (which we’re 4th in the NL in). Also, looking back, we really only had the two big shellackings of Houston, 13-0 and 9-0, the rest was pretty bad.

Whatever, my analytical side is turning off. This has been a fun season to watch and I’m going to enjoy it, luck be damned.

Proud father of Juan Carlos Perez. Think Albert Pujols at second.

by marcello on Jul 9, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

We’re just trying to look at how well teams have played here. But Giants fans should be having a blast this year, and are under no obligation to give a darn about these rankings! :)
-j

by JinAZ on Jul 9, 2009 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I’m enjoying it, even though I know we’ve been lucky. Not to mention, Timmy’s 6 inning no-hit bid tonight was fun. It really feels like an issue of when, not if, with him.

Proud father of Juan Carlos Perez. Think Albert Pujols at second.

by marcello on Jul 10, 2009 2:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz