Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: PHOTOS: Mike Moser's Dunk Face Is Spectacular

How Do You Measure a Pitching Coach?



There has been considerable debate over at DRaysBay regarding how to evaluate Jim Hickey. I figured it may be a good idea to bring the generic version of the discussion to BtB to remove any bias. Obviously, it is a very difficult task. It has to require a judgement call based on many studies. Things considered to date include:

Pitcher development from one year to the next under Hickey

Pitcher Development from one pitching coach to Hickey

Pitcher Development from Hickey to another coach

Metrics looked at were: K/9, K%, HR/9, uBB/9 K/BB, Pitch Types, K/BB, Strike %, PItches/IP

Pitchers were lumped as either a starter or reliever based on IP being  > or < less 100

We compared the average change across the group

We also compared the change for the whole group

I'd like to know what other data the great minds on this site think would be worth looking into in order to properly assess a pitching coach. Its too difficult is not acceptable as front offices are forced to make this evaluation.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Have you seen JC Bradbury's study on Mazzone?

And someone had one recently looking at Dave Duncan.

I’m in the middle of something so I can’t go link hunting at the moment, but I’ll try and check back and see if they’re still needed in a bit.

by Dan Turkenkopf on Jun 24, 2009 7:48 PM EDT reply actions  

I did one

for the Maple Street Press Cardinals Annual on Dave Duncan. What I did was compared how pitchers performed under Duncan’s tutelage and how those same pitchers performed under other pitching coaches. I compared their ERAs, their BB/9, their K/9, and their HR/9. Then I normalized for league and park factors and concluded that, as a Cardinal, Duncan’s pitchers have performed about 1.5 wins per year better than they performed when they pitched for anyone else. I used Bradbury’s study of Mazzone as a reference and starting point. That article is really good.

by chuckb on Jun 25, 2009 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would think stuff like GB%, Strike%, BB, K's

You know, things that you can tell are a deliberate change in style.

St. Louis relievers... defying win expectancy since 2008
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com/

by vivaelpujols on Jun 25, 2009 5:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Prince Fielder in Comerica Park
Crystal_ball_small
Sparky vs Buck
Img_3830_small
BtBS Fantasy League
Small
Context Neutral Run and RBI projections
Small
Free Agent Compensation
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
Strike_three2_small
Effect of Foul Area on Strikeouts: AL 1954-68: Erratum
Small
Baseball on a stick
Small
Player Evaluating Statistic
Baseball_small
Rays Outfield: Cheap but Extremely Productive

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Picture-6_small Chris St. John

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung