Beyond the Box Score: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Follow the @sbnation College Twitter List

Graph of the Day: Offense and the Economy

This weekend, I was discussing with a reader some of the possible reasons for the offensive explosion in the mid-1990s. You're all familiar with the list of possibilities: livelier ball, smaller ballparks, bigger players (both from exercise and from steroids). For some reason, I started wondering whether there was a connection to the economy. 

I decided to plot the annual growth rate of America's GDP against the average runs scored in a major league game for each season.  Although there's no real relationship before 1993, after that time there's a strange pattern.

Gdp_and_runs_per_game_medium

Granted it's not an exact pattern, but the offensive levels and the growth rate of the economy appear to move pretty closely over the past 15 years.

Why did this start in 1993?  And what might be the reason for it?

Well, Occam's razor suggests coincidence, but that's unfulfilling.  So I'll take a stab at some explanations, and welcome any other suggestions.

The early nineties seem to be when baseball as big business really took off.  Yes, it's always been a business, but between 1990 and 1992,  the average team payroll almost doubled (from $17 million to $32 million).  TV and other revenue also grew substantially around this time (although much slower than payroll). Also, the ownership mix has changed in the past few decades. Where in the past many owners were individuals, or small groups, the nineties saw many more corporate owners, who may be more sensitive to economic fluctuations.

The connection between offensive levels and the economy is a little bit harder to explain, especially considering many people have found that the salary rate of free agents is essentially linear compared to their overall value. 

Despite those findings, it's always seemed to me that offensive value brought in more money than did defensive value.  It's possible that when the economy is growing, owners are more willing to dole out the big bucks to sluggers.  When the economy isn't going so hot, perhaps owners and GMs shift their focus to cheaper, more defensive-minded position players - leaving one-dimensional hitters without jobs.

I'm not that satisfied with my explanation, but it's all I've got at the moment.  What do you think?  Is there anything to this, or is it just a meaningless coincidence?

2 recs  |  Comment 11 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Correlation?

What’s the R value on those data?

http://statspeak.net

by pizzacutter on May 25, 2009 4:29 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think...

that the correlation between offense and the economey might be slight, but it shows. Players that are payed $20M will probably have more inscentive to hit than someone earning $1M. That also clashed though with players on their contract year and play better for more cash. With any explanation though, offense and economey have a slight correlation.

by JackofAllTrades on May 25, 2009 7:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Is there a connection between GDP growth rate and payroll (or payroll growth rate)?

How about a connectionbetwee payroll growth rate and league scoring (growth rate)?

One thing I worry about in the hypothesized connection based on the graph is that even if owners want to spend less money, they’re still likely to sign the same players, as a group. In order for offense to go down, we’d need to have some big boppers go unsigned and some pitchers and defensive studs not only take some of their money, but their rosters spots and playing time. Do we think owners’ and GMs’ perception of the MLB-quality pool changes?

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on May 25, 2009 8:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Good question

Although anectdotally that seems to have somewhat this off-season. A fair amount of the FAs who couldn’t find work were power hitters while good defensive players got reasonable contracts. At most we’re talking a difference of 4 or 5 part time players though, so it’s probably not that meaningful.

I didn’t say I necessarily liked my idea, just that it’s what I could come up with :-)

by Dan Turkenkopf on May 25, 2009 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well I like it, so we're not letting it go ; )

 I wonder if the fact that sluggers get paid less means their managers feel less impotus to play them regularly…?

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on May 25, 2009 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now there's an interesting study...

How big a factor does money really play in playing time decisions?

by Dan Turkenkopf on May 25, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would think a lot

Guys with big contracts, especially long terms ones, are generally given more wiggle room as managers want to try and get something out of them. For example, even after Adam Eaton’s terrible season in 07, he was given 19 starts the next year (and predictably, he pitched terribly). I would suspect that the reason behind that decision, was the fact that Eaton was owed 8 million that year, and the Phillies wanted to give him a chance to turn it around before eating the money.

St. Louis Cardinals... defying win expectancy since 2008

by vivaelpujols on May 26, 2009 2:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That seems about right to me

But I’m wondering if big money makes managers/GMs more “loyal” than they would be with a starter making closer to the minimum.

I think it does, but how much?

by Dan Turkenkopf on May 26, 2009 7:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What if we took the Oliver Stone conspiracy perspective...

When the economy is down, MLB needs a boost in revenue. They know that increasing offense means more tickets sold, so they bump up offense (the ball?). When the economy gets better, they bring offense down a bit so as not to have it at 6 RPG eventually.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on May 26, 2009 3:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?
Start posting on Beyond the Box Score »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
PZR-based Win Values 2001-2006
Small
The "30 parks on a budget" challenge
Sunflower_small
World Series Simulation, Game #6
Small
JT20 Dynasty League
E52205a2_small
New Look
Sth70021_small
Exploring Hit f/x, Albeit Badly
Redcap_small
Ricky Nolasco: 4 WAR or 1 WAR?
Redcap_small
Apparently I can't do park adjustments
Small
Which tells us more: The last 7 at bats or 7 at bats against this pitcher?
Sleepy_jeff_small
How Efficient and Effective Were the Rockies in 2009?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

The Mistake Lottery
On the Field, the Yankees Are The Team of the Decade. Off It? The Red Sox.
Tigers' all-time WAR leaders
Primer on Runs Created
How to improve basketball
LB Keith Bulluck uses a sabermetric analogy to explain the Titans' quarterback situation.
Alcides Escobar "abandoned his daughter before she was born"
UZR, Scouting, and the Fans
Not-So-Lousy Lineup Optimizer, Playoff Edition: New York Yankees

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

BtB on Twitter

Main Feed: @BtBScore

Tommy B: @tommy_bennett
Sky: @BtB_Sky
Dan: @dturkenk
Harry: @harrypav
Jinaz: @jinazreds
Jack: @jh_moore
Erik: @Erik_Manning
Tommy R: @trancel
Justin: @justinbopp

Subscribe to BtB via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Most Commented

Limes_125_small
Time To Move On
770insig_small
Negative Team WAR - 2009 Edition
Nando_small
A Complete and Lenghty List of Baseball-Related Things Miguel Olivo is Good At
E52205a2_small
New Look
Redcap_small
Hardy for Gomez: A Defensive Win-Win

Managers

Nando_small R.J. Anderson

Limes_125_small Sky Kalkman

E52205a2_small Tommy Bennett

Editors

Face_small Harry Pavlidis

Rawlings_baseball_bigger_small Dan Turkenkopf

770insig_small Jeff Zimmerman (TucsonRoyal)

Aviles_small Justin Bopp

Authors

Banny_small erik

Raysring1_small Tommy Rancel

Jinaz-reds-avatar_small JinAZ

Jmlogo_small Jack Moore

1753738656_110919ebe9_o_small vivaelpujols

1_small Graham

Baseball_small Mike Rogers

Redcap_small SFiercex4

Small Patrick Clark

Walter_album_small Walter Fulbright