Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

Layering the PITCHf/x Leaderboards

Continuing my series (Part 1) looking at detailed pitcher stats made possible by PITCHf/x data, today I'm going to look at RV100 data by strike zone layer.  Remember, RV100 stands for Run Value per 100 pitches and is compared to average.

What's a layer?  

Think of the strike zone and surrounding space as a cake.  Chocolate cake, angel food cake, whatever kind of cake you like.  When you move between layers of a cake, you move up and down. That's opposed to slices of a cake, where you move side to side between slices.  Layers pay no regard to the lateral location of the pitch, and slices ignore the vertical location.  Here's a diagram for the five layers I use:

Layers_medium

"Middle" pitches are the middle third of a hitter's strike zone. "Up" and "Down" are the top and bottom thirds of the strike zone, respectively, creating three equal layers. "High" and "Low" are above and below the strike zone, respectively.

The overall top and bottom of the strike zone for each hitter is defined by the average values across all plate appearances by that hitter.  Aggregating their zones evens out oddities that arise from the top and bottom boundaries being manually set by human PITCHf/x operators.

Here are the baseline RV100 numbers for each layer, found by combining all PITCHf/x data going back to 2006.  I mean everything, including the WBC, Futures Games, Exhibition, Playoffs and Regular Season. Lower numbers are better for pitchers.

High    1.84
Up -2.46
Middle -2.75
Down -1.76
Low 1.79

Here are the best and worst pitchers by strike zone layer, based on 2009 regular season games through May 14.  A minimum 71 pitches was needed to qualify for a layer.

Good High
Todd Wellemeyer -2.9
Kevin Slowey -2.6
Scott Feldman -1.7
Zack Greinke -1.2
Randy Wolf -1.0
Good Up
Andrew Bailey -9.4
Lance Cormier -7.4
Zack Greinke -7.3
Rich Harden -6.6
David Purcey -6.2
Good Middle
Brian Bannister -9.6
Dan Haren -7.1
Matt Palmer -7.0
Carlos Villanueva -6.8
Jamey Wright -6.7
Good Down
Jered Weaver -6.3
Clay Condrey -6.2
Ross Ohlendorf -5.5
Rick Porcello -5.3
Yusmeiro Petit -5.3
Good Low
Zack Greinke -2.4
Tim Lincecum -2.4
Javier Vazquez -1.8
Ryan Dempster -1.2
Glen Perkins -1.0
Bad High
Gavin Floyd 5.4
Edwin Jackson 5.3
Chris Jakubauskas 5.1
Daniel Cabrera 4.6
Manny Parra 4.5
Bad Up
Jose Contreras 2.9
Dana Eveland 2.6
Ian Snell 2.3
Clayton Richard 2.3
Mark Hendrickson 2.0
Bad Middle
Julian Tavarez 3.8
Scott Olsen 2.2
Edwin Moreno 2.0
Felipe Paulino 1.5
Sidney Ponson 1.3
Bad Down
Geoff Geary 3.8
Brett Anderson 3.1
Chris Jakubauskas 2.8
Brian Moehler 2.0
Shawn Camp 1.8
Bad Low
Tim Wakefield 6.0
Chad Durbin 5.7
Aaron Laffey 5.6
Dallas Braden 5.4
Jose Contreras 5.3

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Odd.

For as many “hanging” knuckleballs that get hit off of Wake, you’d think that he’d be a better pitcher when the ball drops like crazy. I’m probably missing something here though.

by bdalebs on May 18, 2009 4:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Not saying you're missing it, but remember that it's not just batted balls that get counted here.

For RV100, small changes in run expectancy caused by changes in the ball-strike count are included.

So for Wakefield, maybe when he misses low, he misses really low and players can lay off it? Maybe hitters only really swing when the ball looks like it’s over the heart of the plate, and if that’s true, it won’t move enough to be well low? Just musing out loud…

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on May 18, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Next time ...

I’ll include stuff that will help with the “how does that number come about?”. Like called ball/strike rates, whiffs, slugging rate on contact etc. Also GB/FB/LD rates if you all behave yourselves. Either that or we get 27 hours a day for a couple days.

by Harry Pavlidis on May 18, 2009 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am suprised Wellemeyer is good at anything

Watching him pitching recently has been depressing. He has been over throwing his fastball and it has been going up. So maybe that has something to do with it. The batter assumes it will just be a ball but occasionally he gets a strike.

Stat Whore

by FlimtotheFlam on May 19, 2009 1:53 PM EDT reply actions  

How real are these numbers?

Have you seen run value by slice or layer be consistent for a given pitcher across time?

Definitely interesting stuff. I can’t believe Banny is almost a full win better than average belt high.

by Dan Turkenkopf on May 20, 2009 8:05 AM EDT reply actions  

Good points all around

First, I’m not to excited about the pollution of batted ball data in here. I noticed some of the slice/layer leaders have unusually low BABIP. Based on that alone, I’d predict some instability in the measures when you slice them up. Is that anything more than the result of narrowing the sample, assuming that’s what happens, I dunno. I probably won’t look at that question until I work out the component based approach.

by Harry Pavlidis on May 20, 2009 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz