Beyond the Box Score: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Layering the PITCHf/x Leaderboards

I wonder if Banny knows how good his run value is on belt-high pitches.

More photos » by Marcio Jose Sanchez - AP

I wonder if Banny knows how good his run value is on belt-high pitches.

Continuing my series (Part 1) looking at detailed pitcher stats made possible by PITCHf/x data, today I'm going to look at RV100 data by strike zone layer.  Remember, RV100 stands for Run Value per 100 pitches and is compared to average.

What's a layer?  

Think of the strike zone and surrounding space as a cake.  Chocolate cake, angel food cake, whatever kind of cake you like.  When you move between layers of a cake, you move up and down. That's opposed to slices of a cake, where you move side to side between slices.  Layers pay no regard to the lateral location of the pitch, and slices ignore the vertical location.  Here's a diagram for the five layers I use:

Layers_medium

"Middle" pitches are the middle third of a hitter's strike zone. "Up" and "Down" are the top and bottom thirds of the strike zone, respectively, creating three equal layers. "High" and "Low" are above and below the strike zone, respectively.

The overall top and bottom of the strike zone for each hitter is defined by the average values across all plate appearances by that hitter.  Aggregating their zones evens out oddities that arise from the top and bottom boundaries being manually set by human PITCHf/x operators.

Here are the baseline RV100 numbers for each layer, found by combining all PITCHf/x data going back to 2006.  I mean everything, including the WBC, Futures Games, Exhibition, Playoffs and Regular Season. Lower numbers are better for pitchers.

High    1.84
Up -2.46
Middle -2.75
Down -1.76
Low 1.79

Here are the best and worst pitchers by strike zone layer, based on 2009 regular season games through May 14.  A minimum 71 pitches was needed to qualify for a layer.

Good High
Todd Wellemeyer -2.9
Kevin Slowey -2.6
Scott Feldman -1.7
Zack Greinke -1.2
Randy Wolf -1.0
Good Up
Andrew Bailey -9.4
Lance Cormier -7.4
Zack Greinke -7.3
Rich Harden -6.6
David Purcey -6.2
Good Middle
Brian Bannister -9.6
Dan Haren -7.1
Matt Palmer -7.0
Carlos Villanueva -6.8
Jamey Wright -6.7
Good Down
Jered Weaver -6.3
Clay Condrey -6.2
Ross Ohlendorf -5.5
Rick Porcello -5.3
Yusmeiro Petit -5.3
Good Low
Zack Greinke -2.4
Tim Lincecum -2.4
Javier Vazquez -1.8
Ryan Dempster -1.2
Glen Perkins -1.0
Bad High
Gavin Floyd 5.4
Edwin Jackson 5.3
Chris Jakubauskas 5.1
Daniel Cabrera 4.6
Manny Parra 4.5
Bad Up
Jose Contreras 2.9
Dana Eveland 2.6
Ian Snell 2.3
Clayton Richard 2.3
Mark Hendrickson 2.0
Bad Middle
Julian Tavarez 3.8
Scott Olsen 2.2
Edwin Moreno 2.0
Felipe Paulino 1.5
Sidney Ponson 1.3
Bad Down
Geoff Geary 3.8
Brett Anderson 3.1
Chris Jakubauskas 2.8
Brian Moehler 2.0
Shawn Camp 1.8
Bad Low
Tim Wakefield 6.0
Chad Durbin 5.7
Aaron Laffey 5.6
Dallas Braden 5.4
Jose Contreras 5.3

0 recs  |  Comment 14 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Around SB Nation

Six for Six

Nov 2009 from The Good Phight - 104 comments

Comments

Display:

Odd.

For as many “hanging” knuckleballs that get hit off of Wake, you’d think that he’d be a better pitcher when the ball drops like crazy. I’m probably missing something here though.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on May 18, 2009 4:35 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Not saying you're missing it, but remember that it's not just batted balls that get counted here.

For RV100, small changes in run expectancy caused by changes in the ball-strike count are included.

So for Wakefield, maybe when he misses low, he misses really low and players can lay off it? Maybe hitters only really swing when the ball looks like it’s over the heart of the plate, and if that’s true, it won’t move enough to be well low? Just musing out loud…

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on May 18, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Next time ...

I’ll include stuff that will help with the “how does that number come about?”. Like called ball/strike rates, whiffs, slugging rate on contact etc. Also GB/FB/LD rates if you all behave yourselves. Either that or we get 27 hours a day for a couple days.

by Harry Pavlidis on May 18, 2009 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am suprised Wellemeyer is good at anything

Watching him pitching recently has been depressing. He has been over throwing his fastball and it has been going up. So maybe that has something to do with it. The batter assumes it will just be a ball but occasionally he gets a strike.

Stat Whore

by FlimtotheFlam on May 19, 2009 1:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

How real are these numbers?

Have you seen run value by slice or layer be consistent for a given pitcher across time?

Definitely interesting stuff. I can’t believe Banny is almost a full win better than average belt high.

by Dan Turkenkopf on May 20, 2009 8:05 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Good points all around

First, I’m not to excited about the pollution of batted ball data in here. I noticed some of the slice/layer leaders have unusually low BABIP. Based on that alone, I’d predict some instability in the measures when you slice them up. Is that anything more than the result of narrowing the sample, assuming that’s what happens, I dunno. I probably won’t look at that question until I work out the component based approach.

by Harry Pavlidis on May 20, 2009 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?
Start posting on Beyond the Box Score »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
PZR-based Win Values 2001-2006

Recent FanPosts

Small
The "30 parks on a budget" challenge
Sunflower_small
World Series Simulation, Game #6
Small
JT20 Dynasty League
E52205a2_small
New Look
Sth70021_small
Exploring Hit f/x, Albeit Badly
Redcap_small
Ricky Nolasco: 4 WAR or 1 WAR?
Redcap_small
Apparently I can't do park adjustments
Small
Which tells us more: The last 7 at bats or 7 at bats against this pitcher?
Sleepy_jeff_small
How Efficient and Effective Were the Rockies in 2009?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

The Mistake Lottery
On the Field, the Yankees Are The Team of the Decade. Off It? The Red Sox.
Tigers' all-time WAR leaders
Primer on Runs Created
How to improve basketball
LB Keith Bulluck uses a sabermetric analogy to explain the Titans' quarterback situation.
Alcides Escobar "abandoned his daughter before she was born"
UZR, Scouting, and the Fans
Not-So-Lousy Lineup Optimizer, Playoff Edition: New York Yankees

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

BtB on Twitter

Main Feed: @BtBScore

Tommy B: @tommy_bennett
Sky: @BtB_Sky
Dan: @dturkenk
Harry: @harrypav
Jinaz: @jinazreds
Jack: @jh_moore
Erik: @Erik_Manning
Tommy R: @trancel
Justin: @justinbopp

Subscribe to BtB via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Most Commented

Limes_125_small
Time To Move On
Nando_small
A Complete and Lenghty List of Baseball-Related Things Miguel Olivo is Good At
Aviles_small
Minnesota: Fielding TargetView Before & After JJ Hardy
770insig_small
Negative Team WAR - 2009 Edition
E52205a2_small
New Look

Managers

Nando_small R.J. Anderson

Limes_125_small Sky Kalkman

E52205a2_small Tommy Bennett

Editors

Face_small Harry Pavlidis

Rawlings_baseball_bigger_small Dan Turkenkopf

770insig_small Jeff Zimmerman (TucsonRoyal)

Aviles_small Justin Bopp

Authors

Banny_small erik

Raysring1_small Tommy Rancel

Jinaz-reds-avatar_small JinAZ

Jmlogo_small Jack Moore

1753738656_110919ebe9_o_small vivaelpujols

1_small Graham

Baseball_small Mike Rogers

Redcap_small SFiercex4

Small Patrick Clark

Walter_album_small Walter Fulbright