Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Worst Team Ever Projected?

Updating CHONE's Projected 2009 Standings

I'm stealing this idea behind this article from USSMariner.

The baseball season is almost two weeks old.  The Marlins are 9-1 -- quite impressive -- but nobody's ready to hand them the NL East, as ten games isn't evidence of much at all.  Injuries aside, we're not going to change our impression of the talent in Florida.  We are, however, going to give the Marlins credit for those nine wins.  After all, they're not coming off the board.

So if we aren't changing future expectations or changing the results recorded so far, what can we do?  Well, we can combine those two pieces of knowledge into a revised win projection.  For this exercise, I'm using the CHONE projected standings:

The Marlins have played ten games, meaning they have 152 remaining.  CHONE projected them to be 75-87, good for a .463 winning percentage.  Because we're not taking their record so far as evidence to change our opinion of how they'll perform the rest of the season, we can expect them to play .463 ball over the last 152 games, good for 70.4 more wins.  In addition to the nine already in the bank, CHONE's current best guess is for 79.4 total wins on the season.

Let me hammer home a point here: I am not -- and you should not -- fall for the gambler's fallacy.  If a team we expected to go 81-81 on the season starts 10-0, we should not expect them to play ten games under .500 the rest of the way just so they'll end up at 81-81.  We should expect them to play .500 ball the rest of the way, going 76-76, because our best guess at their talent level is still that of a .500 team.  Expecting a team to win fewer games the rest of the way because they've won more games than expected so far is just bad reasoning (strength of schedule issues aside).

I'm sure you don't only care about the Marlins, so here are my modified CHONE projected standings, with the assumption that every team is just as good right now as CHONE thought it would be before the season started.  W and L are the original CHONE projections.  cW and cW are each team's current wins and losses.  nW and nL are the new projected wins and losses.  And delta is the change in projected wins because of the games played so far:

AL East

AL East W  L  cW cL nW nL delta
Yankees  97 65 6 5 96.4 65.6 -.6
Red Sox  96 66 4 6 94.1 67.9 -1.9
Rays  89 73 5 6 88.0 74.0 -1.0
Blue Jays  75 87 8 4 77.4 84.6 2.4
Orioles  74 88 6 4 75.4 86.6 1.4

 

AL Central

AL Central W  L  cW cL nW nL delta
Indians  90 72 3 8 86.9 75.1 -3.1
Tigers  85 77 5 5 84.8 77.2 -.2
Twins  79 83 5 7 78.1 83.9 -.9
Royals  72 90 6 4 73.6 88.4 1.6
White Sox  73 89 5 5 73.5 88.5 .5


AL West

AL West W  L  cW cL nW nL delta
Angels  85 77 4 6 83.8 78.2 -1.2
A's  81 81 5 5 81.0 81.0 .0
Mariners  78 84 8 3 80.7 81.3 2.7
Rangers  72 90 4 6 71.6 90.4 -.4


NL East

NL East W  L  cW cL nW nL delta
Phillies  87 75 4 5 86.2 75.8 -.8
Braves  86 76 5 5 85.7 76.3 -.3
Mets  86 76 5 5 85.7 76.3 -.3
Marlins  75 87 9 1 79.4 82.6 4.4
Nationals  74 88 1 8 70.9 91.1 -3.1


NL Central

NL Central W  L  cW cL nW nL delta
Cubs  88 74 6 4 88.6 73.4 .6
Cardinals  83 79 8 4 84.9 77.1 1.9
Reds  82 80 5 4 82.4 79.6 .4
Brewers  81 81 3 7 79.0 83.0 -2.0
Pirates  73 89 5 5 73.5 88.5 .5
Astros  72 90 3 7 70.6 91.4 -1.4


NL West

NL West W  L cW cL nW nL delta
Dodgers  82 80 8 3 84.4 77.6 2.4
Padres  80 82 8 3 82.6 79.4 2.6
Rockies  78 84 4 5 77.7 84.3 -.3
D-Backs  79 83 3 7 77.1 84.9 -1.9
Giants  77 85 3 7 75.2 86.8 -1.8


Do It Yourself

What's that?  You think the CHONE projections are lame?  Well, I disagree, but if you'd like to input your own pre-season projections and see what the updated expected standings are, feel free to download the spreadsheet I used and modify the W and L columns.  Everything else will automatically update.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Wow Padres pushing .500

King of the bling come to lay down the evidence//Not George Bush, L-Millz be da president

by Sam Page on Apr 19, 2009 1:35 AM EDT reply actions  

wait, wait

Surely only having a ten game sample massively increases the strength of schedule issues?

Therefore, it’s not subject to the gamblers fallacy (which assumes an equal playing field both before and after the point in time), because if a team is overperforming due to a weak schedule thus far, well, those games are now off the table, meaing that the strength of schedule for the rest of the season will be greater (or vice versa, if you will).

With a larger sample size, it can be assumed that the strength of schedule will be more or less the same as the rest of the season (rare cases aside).

Unless I’m massively missing something here?

It's never too soon to jump to conclusions

by alea iacta est on Apr 19, 2009 1:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Context Neutral Run and RBI projections
Small
Free Agent Compensation
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
Strike_three2_small
Effect of Foul Area on Strikeouts: AL 1954-68: Erratum
Small
Baseball on a stick
Small
Player Evaluating Statistic
Baseball_small
Rays Outfield: Cheap but Extremely Productive
Small
A new xBABIP
Small
Jack Morris "pitching to the score"
Strike_three2_small
Foul Area and Differences in SO: AL vs NL

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Picture-6_small Chris St. John

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung