Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Todd Haley Is The Steelers Next Offensive Coordinator

Yankees Acquire Curtis Granderson In 3-Way Trade With Tigers & Diamondbacks

 

It's a Yankee world and we're just living in it. After making one of the only moves on day one of the winter meetings, the Yankees were at in again this time involving the Detroit Tigers and Arizona Diamondbacks in what looks like the signature move of this year's meetings.

As the story goes, the Yankees receive Curtis Granderson, the Tigers will receive Max Scherzer, Daniel Schlereth, Phil Coke and Austin Jackson, and the Diamondbacks get Edwin Jackson, Ian Kennedy and a whole lot of second guessing from fans and writers like myself.

Star-divide

For the Yankees, it's pretty easy to like this deal. Sure, Granderson has his flaws (average-below average defense past two seasons, platoon like split), but even with those flaws he is a safe bet for a 3.5-4 WAR season for each of the remaining four years on his contract.

The contract itself is pretty nifty. For the 29-year-old Granderson, the Yankees will probably pay in the neighborhood of $38 million (estimating some incentives) for the four years. A quick and easy estimate puts his expected value  around $70 million for those years. They could even buyout the final year of the deal making the contract something like three years, $27 million.

Basically, the Yanks get a younger, cheaper, better alternative to Johnny Damon for two arms and a player with the upside to one day be Granderson-lite. Despite his lefty on lefty split, Granderson, and his pull hitting tendency, should enjoy the short porch and wind tunnel in his new home park as well as a few more all-star appearances.

The Tigers are giving up the biggest piece in the deal in Granderson, and downgrade a bit in the interim, but gain four cheap and controllable pieces that should help for seasons to come. Detroit has made no secret about wanting to shed payroll, and clearing the at least $25.75 million guaranteed to Granderson helps towards accomplishing that goal. They also save on Edwin Jackson's impending ERA inflated arbitration raise. They receive Max Scherzer as the big prize in their return. Not only can he fill Jackson's spot in the rotation immediately, but stands a decent upgrade it for much less.

The Tigers could also immediately turn to soon-to-be 23-year-old, Austin Jackson to fill Granderson's spot in the field. There will no doubt be a significant dip in production overall, but Jackson stands to be average in centerfield and brings speed to the lineup. As is the case with most young players, he strikeouts a lot and hasn't mastered the art of walks, but for the league minimum he could provide a nice value in Granderson's absense.

The other two pieces, Schlereth and Coke will help sure up a Tigers pen than stands to lose Brandon Lyon and Fernando Rodney to free agency. Both pitchers are lefties, and neither regarded as a future relief ace, but both stand to be average at least and more importantly cheap and controllable. Coke's future looks more LOOGY than fellow south paw, Schlereth. Mark's son has at least shown the ability to get righties out in the minor leagues; Once again, cheap, decent and immediate alternatives to more expensive options.

From the Diamondbacks stand point, it's hard to see the good in this trade. Edwin Jackson to this day remains more potential than production even with an all-star appearance to his credit. Ian Kennedy spent most of 2009 on the shelf, but has failed in his chances with the Yankees. Both still have potential and maybe a move to the NL West(or back to the NL West for Jackson) will cure what ails them, but it's hard to make the argument that either one is better than Scherzer is right now and will be going forward.

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thanks for the report

I’m whipping up a batch of PITCHf/x on the arms involved in the deal. Prolly post it later tonight.

As far as the deal goes, looks like a good trade for Detroit in the long run. Not so sure about Austin Jackson, though.

by Harry Pavlidis on Dec 8, 2009 5:19 PM EST reply actions  

I am not an Austin Jackson fan and unfortunately didn’t have time to pen an article. So, I like the deal considerably less than some of the analysts of the deal do.

by Mike Rogers on Dec 8, 2009 6:14 PM EST reply actions  

He definitely took a step back from being a top 25 type prospect, but should be solid defensively.

Tigers are definitely giving up offense here, but Scherzer could be a real nice #2 to Verlander’s #1 for the next 5 seasons if both remain in Detroit.

www.draysbay.com

by Tommy Rancel on Dec 8, 2009 7:46 PM EST up reply actions  

TotalZone numbers for minor league outfielders are sketchy at best, but they don’t paint a good picture for Jackson — and I haven’t heard of him as a burner, either. So, he’ll need to have impeccable instincts to be an average fielder in the huge CF in CoPa.

I think we were compensated adequately given what we gave up, however, I think we should’ve stuck to our guns at gotten more. Seemed like Boston shot down Ellsburg/Buchholz and then we just said “Oh well. Lets get SOMETHING for him.” Just a trade that didn’t need to be made immediately in my opinion. Could’ve been made at the trade deadline for a better package.

Maybe that’s karma for getting Miguel Cabrera for Andrew Miller, Cameron Maybin and nothing else.

by Mike Rogers on Dec 9, 2009 2:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Chone

Edwin Jackson +27
Ian Kennedy + 15

Curtis Granderson +37

Max Scherzer +26
Daniel Schlereth +1
Phil Coke + 5
Austin Jackson +0

by Jon Kammerer on Dec 8, 2009 8:02 PM EST reply actions  

Pretty high on Kennedy

makes it look a lot better for the Dbacks.

by lookatthosetwins on Dec 8, 2009 9:34 PM EST up reply actions  

"High"

It’s saying he’s a below average starter. Not exactly something to write home about.

O'Hara: Detective Lassiter is literally on fire.
Spencer: What kind of fire are we talking about-- "Michael Jackson in the Pepsi commercial" fire, or "misusing the word literally" fire?

by PaulThomas on Dec 9, 2009 1:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Free Agent Compensation
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
Strike_three2_small
Effect of Foul Area on Strikeouts: AL 1954-68: Erratum
Small
Baseball on a stick
Small
Player Evaluating Statistic
Baseball_small
Rays Outfield: Cheap but Extremely Productive
Small
A new xBABIP
Small
Jack Morris "pitching to the score"
Strike_three2_small
Foul Area and Differences in SO: AL vs NL
Baseball_small
Is there a Kuroda and Oswalt Alternative?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Picture-6_small Chris St. John

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung