Beyond the Box Score: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

DiamondView: 2009 New York Yankees

I am very pleased to announce our newest series, in which we will give you a peek at the hitting performances from 2009, team-by-team, division-by-division, using Justin Bopp's excellent DiamondView. The honor of going first falls to the World Champion New York Yankees. But first, let me explain what our data expert (Jeff Zimmerman) and our graphics expert (Justin Bopp) have cooked up for you all.

There are four categories per player: defense (UZR/150), speed (EqBRR), power (ISO), and on-base (OBP). Each category is scaled as a percentile of the major league totals (for more details, see the original article linked above). Also included on each chart (in dark tones behind the image for the player) is the positional average at the player's dominant position. Justin then sprinkles his magic graphics dust (I really have no idea how he does it), and the results are like you see here. 

Three caveats before we begin. First, we have excluded the DH because it's abhorrent to the spirit of baseball since there is no meaningful way to rate their defense. Second, the data used include only last year's performance. Finally, catcher defense remains problematic, so each catcher is given the same defensive mark. This is certainly not optimal, and we'll see if we can't come up with a better way to do things going forward. If you have a suggestion, please leave it in the comments.

Without further ado, here are the 2009 New York Yankees.

1B Mark Teixeira


Batter-dvc2-yankees-1b-teixeira_medium

UZR didn't like Teixeira's 2009 season one bit, but Yankee fans tell a different tune. In all likelihood he'll bounce back with the glove next year. That'll make him a nearly all-around player, as you can see his hitting is phenomenal. I think he likes his new home park.

Star-divide

2B Robinson Cano


Batter-dvc2-yankees-2b-cano_medium

Cano put together a nice season with the bat for just about any position, but especially for the keystone. He's not a great baserunner and his fielding is below league average, but so long as the bat plays, Cano plays.

3B Alex Rodriguez


Batter-dvc2-yankees-3b-arod_medium

The fielding is the only thing that keeps ARod from retaining "complete player" on his list of titles (which now, thankfully, includes "The Man Who Destroyed the Myth of Clutch"). It makes me wonder about the accuracy on an individual basis of the fielding spectrum, at least insofar as players can move fluidly across it. Imagine a world where ARod stuck at short.

C Jorge Posada


Batter-dvc2-yankees-c-posada_medium

Posada versus the aging curve! Sometimes, the best way to win a race against time is to start late. Since Posada didn't become a regular until age 26 in 1998, he is able to put up an ISO that is in the 90th percentile of all players at age 37. He's death on the base-paths and may see considerable time at DH over the coming seasons, but there's still a lot of color on that chart.

CF Melky Cabrera


Batter-dvc2-yankees-cf-cabrera_medium

The number one way to get a rise out of a Yankee fan is either to praise or disparage Melky Cabrera. I'm not sure why a player who is so close to league average causes so much disagreement, but it may be because it is sometimes hard to look at league average and appreciate it. He might have been over his head in '09, but he's earned an every day job. 

LF Johnny Damon


Batter-dvc2-yankees-lf-damon_medium

He's flying that kite-shaped set of tools to free agency, and likely won't be Bomber in '10. His fielding, never world-beating, is approaching liability status. His bat has turned out to be quite the asset, and he still turns it up on the bases. He'll fall back on offense and bounce back on defense and will provide moderate value somewhere.

RF Nick Swisher


Batter-dvc2-yankees-rf-swisher_medium

Not to be confused with the rap collective that frequently finds itself posted up in a parking lot, Swisher's house is built on a foundation of plate discipline and prodigious power. Tough to believe that he was traded for peanuts a year ago. Anyone heard from Jeff Marquez or Wilson Betemit lately?

SS Derek Jeter

Batter-dvc2-yankees-ss-jeter_medium

Praising Jeter's tangible skills is the new hating on Jeter's intangibles and defense.

There are two camps in the sabermetric world: those who believe leadoff skills are unique and those who believe batting order is a Triassic relic. I happen to fall into the former group, and Patriot has demonstrated Jeter's excellence at the essential leadoff skills. His 96th percentile on-base skills are the best thing you could have getting five plate appearances a game, and his base running acts like a force multiplier

Next up: Boston Red Sox

 

editor: Updated all images to include transparent position averages. - jbopp

1 recs  |  Comment 46 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Awesome.

http://www.capitolavenueclub.com/

by PWHjort on Dec 19, 2009 4:02 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

I really like the transparency on Jeter's

it should be included with all of them.

by philosofool on Dec 19, 2009 4:35 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Replying to myself here to note that Boston’s DVC all have the transparent position average on top of the player-specific diamond. I think it turned out well and can’t wait to see your reactions.

by Justin Bopp on Dec 21, 2009 12:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Keep it up, these are fantastic.

by thegreatchris on Dec 19, 2009 4:40 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

looks neat, but since obviously the real value of the 4 factors are not the same, the area impression is misleading. the area thing being the most important feature of this graph

by awayish on Dec 19, 2009 7:15 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

This is an obvious and not-inaccurate criticism of this style of presentation. I don’t disagree, if one looks at it from your assumption that area is the most important part (which I would argue misses the point of creating a position-based expected “shape.”).

The best criticism of this visual is that it unfairly equates the ability to get on base with base-running ability. And the counter-response would be the same.

The key here, I think, is that we have the ablity to compare a player’s core tools across the literal spectrum of other players. We can overlook some flaws in the visual to understand the intention.

by Justin Bopp on Dec 21, 2009 12:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

it’s not meant as a criticism in the sense of discounting other virtues of the presentation. i just think that the area impression is natural to people, ie bigger area = better player. that sometimes can be misleading

by awayish on Dec 22, 2009 7:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The problem is that intuitively, one DOES tend to look at the area covered for a player as the key measure of value. That is what the human mind does with this information, whether that was the intent or not. A second problem, aside from the fact that the four components are not of equal value, is that the arrangements of the components dramatically affects the area of a player. Ellsbury, who currently has a very narrow shape and very little area covered, would look very different if baserunning were adjacent to on-base instead of opposite it.

by GreggBor on Dec 23, 2009 6:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Catcher D

devil_fingers over at Driveline Mechanics did some work on Catcher Defense for 2009 back in October. It’s probably not a bad place to start, and is better than nothing. Reading through the comments, it sounds as if fangraphs is rolling out something this winter.

by Hizilla on Dec 20, 2009 2:01 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Now this will be exciting. The true usefulness will be if it can be translated to a UZR score that we can keep in the same DB, rather than pulling from several different resources for the “same” stat.

by Justin Bopp on Dec 21, 2009 12:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

First, we have excluded the DH because it’s abhorrent to the spirit of baseball since there is no meaningful way to rate their defense.

I think you had it right the first time.

As for DiamondView, I love it! Loved it the first time it popped up here, and it’s still a very cool little tool. Excellent work :) .

"Admirably obsessive." - Uni Watch, March 24th, 2009
NA34 | HK | RMN
"Even our depth has depth." - Silverblood

by oo_nrb on Dec 20, 2009 5:03 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps the best way to treat DHs would be to project their limited time in the field (LF or 1B) and just go with that. One of the things we ran into early on is that it is best to focus on a player’s best or most-played position and to throw out the idea of combinining and weighting his various UZR scores at all of them. (which is where we saw Adam Dunn at -27 or Zobrist at 112 or something).

by Justin Bopp on Dec 21, 2009 12:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That's easy.

It’s Yuniesky Betancourt if he switched positions. Duh. Next question!

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on Dec 20, 2009 5:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Makes me feel better about the Tigers possibly turning down Scherzer for Edwin Jackson because it wasn’t a good enough deal for EJax!

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on Dec 22, 2009 2:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Is there plans to do this for the 2010 season using projections for each player? Also, you guys going to be running projected standings once the rosters become more finalized since there are Fan Projections at FG now that give you guys the playing time projections?

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on Dec 20, 2009 5:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Can't speak for others obviously

but I had given some thought to doing a playoff odds kind of projected standings using the same simulation code that I used for my post the other day. Basically do 100,000 runs per team and come up with percents based off of those.

by stevesommer05 on Dec 20, 2009 7:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sweet!

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on Dec 22, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I absolutely would like to do a projected version of this. The best way I can think of would be to set up a DB with several years of data and then literally combine the visual output into a single chart. I think the eye could/would visually calculate the next year on its own.

I’d need some statistical support to come up with an acceptable projection for a single future-year, though.

One thing to remember is that all of these stats, being a percentile, are relative to every other player’s stats, rather than being able to stand on their own like a static score.

by Justin Bopp on Dec 21, 2009 12:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think

We’d only have to project EQBRR I think. Couldn’t we use one of the projection systems (i.e. CHONE) to get the offensive numbers and then either Jeff’s or my UZR projections?

by stevesommer05 on Dec 21, 2009 12:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was thinking in line with Steve. Couldn’t CHONE get used?

My old blog is Tigers By The Numbers.

Now I write at Bless You Boys.

Like music? See what I'm listening to at my Last.fm account.

by Mike Rogers on Dec 22, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jeff / Justin / Tommy

Any thought on having a “summary Diamondview” that is based on team level percentiles?

by stevesommer05 on Dec 20, 2009 9:19 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

This is a good idea as well, and I have thought of it. The question for me is what the best visual story we want to tell is?

I’m thinking about combining all important players onto one chart with every player set to the same transparency (5-15%?). That would create a really sweet visual effect where every shared area would get brighter and brighter based on the number of stacked players in that area.

Then an empty outline of that team’s average “score” across all categories? I’d have to ask my stat friends if that would be a valid thing to do (considering positional adjustments and whatnot) or if it would be better to stick with the idea above.

by Justin Bopp on Dec 21, 2009 12:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't mean

to get rid of the individuals, just have a summary at the beginning / end that has team level percentiles for the categories. You could just use the team value pages on Fangraphs I’d think.

by stevesommer05 on Dec 21, 2009 12:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Awesome, I mean, Really Awesome

Arod came back in a hurry to save the season. Let’s see if his defense rebounds, or if winds up like Mike Lowell.

I’d love to see these (and future versions) with a 5-4-3 regression built in- that might help balance some of the flukiness of UZR.

"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."

by jscape2000 on Dec 20, 2009 10:01 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Tommy / Jeff:

Can you reply to this or help me come up with a way to show this? I see the issue.

I read a great comment over at Pinstripe Alley that mentioned the problem of this being a single-year description, but as always, my strength is in visualization, not data projection. Perhaps we can come up with a really cool projected version of this (as noted in a comment above)?

by Justin Bopp on Dec 21, 2009 12:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Position adjustments

I still think that the fielding number should be modified by position, i.e. UZR/150 + Position adjustment. That way, fielding is actually comparable across all players like the other axes are. A below-average fielding SS is probably better than most 1B’s.

Also, I second using the driveline mechanic catcher numbers as a better than nothing option. I think they’re actually fairly decent estimates.
-j

by JinAZ on Dec 21, 2009 12:24 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Updated all images to include transparency.

In retrospect, it’s shocking I didn’t do it on all of them to begin with. I expect there to be some similar update after we do this a few more times.

by Justin Bopp on Dec 21, 2009 8:15 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

aww thanks man.

If you or anybody knows anybody that needs my services, I’m cheap and easy!

by Justin Bopp on Dec 21, 2009 9:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gardner

Any chance one of these could be added for Brett Gardner last season? I mean you can expect his defense and baserunning to be absolutely top notch, tolerable in on base and putrid in power but I’d be curious to see how it all looks put together… Thanks!

by BWOzar on Dec 22, 2009 1:09 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Team Composite

There was a team composite for the Red Sox. Will there be one for the Yankee’s?

by RobertG on Dec 23, 2009 12:34 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I probably should make one, huh?

Lemme see if I can get one out soon. Things starting to ramp up with the holidays, so give me just a little bit of time.

by Justin Bopp on Dec 23, 2009 1:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?
Start posting on Beyond the Box Score »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Cbs_fantasy_baseball_promo

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Picture-2_small
Advanced Graphing Techniques Part 4 - Cluster Analysis in R

Recent FanPosts

Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Small
Spring Training Statistics?
Patrick_willis_small
WAR Fantasy draft
Small
Is It No Longer Sonny In Tampa?
Limes_125_small
Help With 32 Questions Contest
Otto_-_image_adjusted_small
Good reasons for getting past the divided leagues era
Small
Nathan's Replacement
Rays_small
Chasing the Grail, Part Two
Rays_small
Chasing Sabermetric’s Holy Grail or, Another Stab at Estimating Catcher Defense

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Optimizing the Phillies and Yankees Lineups
Join BtB's Last Minute March Madness Pool
Dave Allen did this with home runs. I thought this might look cool for certain pitchers who had pinpoint command.
Irish Ballplayers -- Seems appropriate for today
Simpson's Paradox, Bert vs. Jack, and more sweet B-Ref splits

I've played fantasy baseball for many years. (My first team's rotation featured rookies Jason Bere and Aaron Sele.  Jay Buhner and Mo Vaughn anchored my lineup.) But I haven't played it well since 2003 or 2004.  My excuse?  Kids.

No, it's not that I fill my rosters with unproven youngsters.  It's that my wife and I have too many.  Too many to allow me the time necessary to have success in a competitive fantasy baseball league.

I've thought about hanging up my fantasy spikes but I really like playing it -not to win necessarily- but really just to keep an eye on good and great players from around baseball.  Players  like Adrian Gonzalez or Josh Johnson who of course come up on the each team's schedule sporadically throughout the summer but then seemingly disappear.  I like knowing about those guys and I like being able to talk to other baseball fans about those guys.  So I play fantasy baseball.  And I'm gonna continue to play.

...As long as at least two or three of you folks wanna join the rest of us in my new league: S(a.N.D)B.O.K.X. Fantasy Baseball.

The SAND is the tautologically redundant part of the acronym: Simple (and Not Difficult)

The BOKX explains just how simple (and not difficult) this league's scoring system will be: Based Only on Ks (strikeouts) and Xs (extra base hits).

* * * This league's scoring system has two only statistics: strikeouts and extra-base hits.* * *

Hopefully, this keeps things simple (and not difficult) and will thus require only a few minutes each week to seek out good hitters and good pitchers to replace not-quite-as-good pitchers and not-quite-as-good hitters.  (And hopefully, I'll have Ryan Howard on my team.)

We'll probably use only players from the National League and  unless things change for some reason, it'll be a points league. It's gonna be on Yahoo! so it'll be free and unless things change for some reason, we'll just be playing for bragging rights (and something to do).

I've had some help from Red Reporter's sabermetric higher-ups and I think I know how to weight things so that the NL's good, better and best strikeout pitchers are going to be worth roughly what the NL's good, better and best sluggers will be worth on draft day.  But I've never seen or heard of a league like this so I don't know quite what to expect and if anybody can think of any reason that this format might go beyond just being quirky and we'll like end up ripping a hole in the space/time continuum, help us out, eh?

So, if you wanna play and/or if you have any questions, let me know below.

We had the draft set for Wednesday, March 31st at 8:30pm EST.  But I'm almost certain that we're going to change that date. I think we'll need to settle on a date and a time and I think we'll need to do it sooner rather than later so as soon as we can get our ninth and tenth owners we'll restart that conversation.

I'm gonna go ahead and post an email address so that if there are any lurkers who wanna play they don't necessarily have to create an SBNation account in order to do so.  Just let me know what you're thinking: SANDBOKX.at.Gmail
Why Nathan's loss won't kill the Twins - ESPN TMI Blog
The Book -- Predicting the HR leader board
Spring Training Pitch FX Data
The All-CHONE Team

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

BtB on Twitter

Main Feed: @BtBScore

Jeff: @jeffwzimmerman
Steve: @steve_sommer
Sky: @BtB_Sky
Dan: @dturkenk
Harry: @harrypav
Jinaz: @jinazreds
Jack: @jh_moore
Erik: @Erik_Manning
Tommy R: @trancel
Justin: @justinbopp

Subscribe to BtB via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Most Commented

Paige_small
Something Ludicrous? Dontrelle as Detroit's Fifth Starter
Paige_small
xFIP Doesn't Think K-Rod is Getting Better
Paige_small
Using BP's "Star System" to Rank the Farm Systems
Paige_small
The Duke of ___________?
Paige_small
Toronto's Lineup Might Not Suck, Soon

BtB Goes Social

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Chicago Cubs pitcher Angel Guzman, center, rubs the head of teammate Carlos Marmol, left, while chatting with Marmol and manager Lou Piniella, right, on the first day of baseball spring training Thursday, Feb. 18, 2010, in Mesa, Ariz. (AP Photo/Paul Connors)

SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: Chicago Cubs, Seeking Redemption

New York Mets starting pitchers Mike Pelfrey, left, Johan Santana, center, and Oliver Perez watch as teammates take part in drills during spring training baseball Saturday, Feb. 27, 2010, in Port St. Lucie, Fla. (AP Photo/Jeff Roberson)

SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: New York Mets, The High Cost Of Low Expectations

Washington Nationals pitcher Stephen Strasburg throws during the second inning of  a spring training baseball game against the Detroit Tigers Tuesday, March 9, 2010 in Viera, Fla. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)

Nationals Send Stephen Strasburg To Double-A Despite Impressive Spring

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Editors

Rawlings_baseball_bigger_small Dan Turkenkopf

Limes_125_small Sky Kalkman

770insig_small Jeff Zimmerman (TucsonRoyal)

Aviles_small Justin Bopp

Paige_small Satchel Price

Authors

Jinaz-reds-avatar_small JinAZ

Face_small Harry Pavlidis

Newavatar_small Matt Klaassen

1753738656_110919ebe9_o_small vivaelpujols

Ozzie_small erik

Big_pun--300x300_small Tommy Rancel

Adam_small adarowski

Redcap_small SFiercex4

St_louis_cardinals_ce1141_003263_small stevesommer05

Julio_teheran_2_small PWHjort

Cclogo_small Daniel Moroz