Attempting To Understand The Orioles Signing of Mike Gonzalez
Being a fan of the Rays, I'm used to Yankees and Red Sox being the top competitors in the division. Yet, the Baltimore Orioles are quietly becoming a team that is starting to scare me. Maybe not in the 2010 season, but come 2011 there could be a serious battle from first to fifth in the AL East.
The Orioles have a deal in place to acquire the services of Mike Gonzalez to become their closer. The deal is reportedly for two years and $12 million dollars with incentives that could push it to $16 million. Despite his type-A status, the Orioles first round pick is protected meaning they'll lose a second-round pick for him. While I'm some what confused by the signing, I don't think it is a bad deal.
I do like Mike Gonzalez, although the price tag still might be a bit high. Despite owning some above average seasons, Gonzalez has never crossed the $6 million WAR dollar value. His career high of 1.7 WAR occurred in 2004, and that was many pitches (and DL stints) ago. As is the case with a lot of pitchers, especially ones with injury histories, health is the key.
Between the years 2007-2008, Gonzalez pitched a combined 50.2 innings. He came back strong in 2009 to throw in a career-high 80 games, and racked up a career-high 74.1 innings (way to ease back those relievers Bobby!). His velocity was back to normal, and he struck out nearly 11 batters per nine innings. There isn't much fluke in his 2009 3.51 FIP; the mark falls just marginally lower than his 3.74 tRA and 3.70 xFIP. Talent isn't the question, but how will he respond to such a heavy work load the following year? Personally, I watched Grant Balfour and J.P. Howell seemingly run out of gas at the end of 2009 because of heavier than usual loads in 2008.
I don't follow the O's close enough to know exactly what the plan looks like. From the outside looking in, it seems they are trying hard to field a decent team in 2010, and an even better one in 2011. A few days ago, Dave Cameron talked about the marginal value of a win. For a team on the cusp of a playoff birth, slightly overpaying a Mike Gonzalez type is worth the risk if the potential reward is the difference between win number 93 and number 94. I think we can agree that Baltimore is not at that level. This is why I'm not sure the Orioles necessarily needed to make this kind of move right now.
0 recs |
5 comments
|
Comments
From the O's perspective
I wrote about the signing when it happened – http://camdencrazies.com/2009/12/16/orioles-sign-mike-gonzalez-to-close/ – and I’m largely in agreement with you. I don’t really like the deal, and find it almost acceptable only because I expect MacPhail to spin Gonzalez off for prospects at some point.
The O’s decided they needed a closer because they were under the mistaken impression that Jim Johnson couldn’t handle the role after George Sherrill was traded. Given that constraint, the deal looks better. It’s certainly better than Brandon Lyon’s contract, and better than signing Fernando Rodney. That’s the best I can do as far as an explanation goes.
Wow, the Braves got royally screwed with their FA relivers. They probably expected to get 2 first round picks from Gonzo and Soriano, and now they get 1 second round pick and a tweener pitcher.
Not that I complaining, being a Phils fan ; )
by philiafan14364 on Dec 17, 2009 10:23 PM EST reply actions
You're right. And they lost their own first round pick on Wagner,
www.draysbay.com, www.beyondtheboxscore.com, Twitter @trancel
by Tommy Rancel on Dec 17, 2009 10:52 PM EST up reply actions
For me, the major concern would be injuries
Gonzalez has shown the ability to miss a lot of bats with his slider, and he’s shown improved control since coming back from Tommy John surgery, although his command has suffered and he’s become more homer-prone.
But he just pitched 74 innings over 80 games after posting previous career highs of 54 innings in 54 games in 2006, and he doesn’t exactly has a sparkling record of durability. Getting an arm with his upside is a decent get at $12M over two years, but as Keith Law noted, losing the draft pick is unfortunate.
In the first 75 picks of each draft since 2003, the Orioles have drafted Nick Markakis, Matt Wieters, Chris Ray, Jeff Fiorentino, Brandon Snyder, Garrett Olson, Nolan Reimold, Billy Rowell, Pedro Beato, Brian Matusz, Xavier Avery, Matt Hobgood and Mychal Givens, and just outside of those picks they’ve landed Brandon Erbe, Jake Arrieta, Zach Britton, L.J. Hoes, and Bob McCrory. Ideally, you don’t want to take away draft picks from a scouting department with that kind of track record, especially when you aren’t realistically contenders yet, barring some kind of monster seasons by Matusz, Tillman and Wieters.
But realistically, they did just get arguably the best reliever on the market this offseason (Soriano and Wagner are close) for a pretty reasonable deal considering what other relievers have gotten. Keep in mind that Brandon Lyon just got more money from Houston.

by 


























