Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Why Don't Losses Count Anymore?

Winning games is the whole point of baseball. Yet all these voters seem to have forgotten that. For whatever reasons these "educated" voters gave the best pitcher awards to pitchers who lost a combined 15 games in 65 appearances. Bollocks says I. Forget these calculators and mathematical equations and focus on what matters: winning games. Or, inversely, not losing games.  The illustrious Herm Edwards once said "You play to win the game," right on Herm. That's why the best pitcher in the league is none other than Hideki Okajima. Oh, I'm crazy you say? Look at these artifacts of record:

68 games, 6 wins, 0 losses

That's more games than San Francisco Giants pitcher "Tim Lincecum" or Kansas City Royals pitcher "Zack Greinke".  Oh, you can point to their increased win totals but that's just dishonest. Okajima is a reliever, one who never let his team down. You can't say that about these other jokers.  In wins he held opponents to a .100 batting average and 100% of his hits allowed were home runs - showing that he let his defenders take the games off in which he won. What a great teammate.

It's time we put the bed sheets and new-fangled numbers behind us. Old-timers will tell you what really matters (wins) and that lead paint looks better than any water-based type.

As for the rest of my ballot:

Brian Bruney 5-0

Joe Nelson 3-0

John Grabow 3-0

Tony Sipp 2-0

Comment 11 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Beyond the Box Score

Comments

Display:

what makes me sad is how many people

agreed with the Why Don’t Wins Count Anymore article. 131 commments? And at least 9/10 (rough guess, I stopped reading them after the first 3) agree with the guy. Damn

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Nov 22, 2009 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Hogwash

If anybody knows how to win it’s Matt Palmer.

by ThundaPC on Nov 22, 2009 6:27 PM EST reply actions  

Well done buddy

My brain started to hurt after perusing some of the comments on that other article. A user mentioned that they asked Mr. Law if he would have voted for a 30-game winner or MVP for a .400 hitter and was dumbfounded when Keith gave an answer stating that those two numbers don’t tell much. I don’t think people realize that if a guy hits .400 and wins the MVP, the smart voter isn’t awarding it based solely on the batting average.

For example, looking at Ted Williams (for the uninitiated he is the last guy to hit .400+) 1941 season, I have him putting up a 0.539 wOBA (data for IBB and ROE is nonexistent so this number may adjust slightly) while the AL average was 0.322. Converting this to wRAA you get 114.3 and turning that into wins, you’re talking 11.4 wins just from the bat. If someone would turn in a season like this today, the main focus would be that that player hit .400, while those that are more statistically inclined would have to wipe the drool from their mouths that someone just put up over 114 more runs than the average player. You could play defense like Brad Hawpe and still be a potentially 10 win player!

Those that are statistically inclined, generally, have been through arguments like this before and are well-armed to counter the arguments that they have heard time-and-time again. On the other side of the fence, the ignorance-is-bliss argument is so ingrained that they don’t have to think about things such as the fact that if a guy hits .400 there is a really, really strong likelihood that they are going to grade well on many different metrics across the board, not something as crazy as looking at one data point and saying that therein lies the truth. Luckily, the ranks of the thinkers seems to be growing. Amen.

I'm not really a NUMBERS guy!!

by Andy Hellicksonstine on Nov 22, 2009 10:25 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Oh by the way

The BBWAA did not award Mr. Williams the MVP after this season.

I'm not really a NUMBERS guy!!

by Andy Hellicksonstine on Nov 23, 2009 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Now if only Ryan Bukvich could get into the Hall of Fame on his ability to not loss.

97 games over over six season and a 3-0 record with a minuscule 6.16 ERA. It is 13 more games than his nearest competitor, Dean Hartgraves.

Jeff Zimmerman - Protecting the world from RBI's and Wins from my mom's guest house.

by Jeff Zimmerman on Nov 23, 2009 1:18 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

Yahoo_full_count

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Recent_pic_pg_small Patrick Gordon

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

Me_small Bryan Grosnick

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung

30472_1481067225243_1190689185_1381415_997334_n_small Glenn DuPaul

1mnvxku7_small joshuaworn

Set_small MattFilippi18

Photo0011_small Nathaniel Stoltz