Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tom Brady And The Confusing Pantheon Of QB Greatness

Chart of the Day: Playoff Odds based on BtB Power Rankings

The BtB Power Rankings are based on an estimated, theoretical winning percentage (I call it Team Quality Index, or TQI) for each team based on their component statistics and an adjustment for league quality.  If we use TQI as an estimate of a team's true talent level (i.e. their quality), we can use those numbers to predict how teams will fare against one another in the playoffs (I used the odds ratio).  Here are those numbers:

Playoffodds-thin_medium

Star-divide

The Yankees lead our power rankings, and so it's not a surprise to see them favored against every team.  The most even matches in the playoffs are between the two NL West teams (Rockies & Dodgers), as well as between the Phillies and the Twins.

"On paper" playoff predictions (prior to yesterday's action...):

ALDS: Yankees over Twins, Red Sox over Angels
NLDS: Dodgers over Cardinals, Rockies over Phillies
ALCS: Yankees over Red Sox
NLCS: Rockies over Dodgers (by a fraction of a percentage...)
World Series: Yankees over Rockies

 

A final review of the regular season power rankings, featuring the data upon which above table is based, is forthcoming. :)

Comment 19 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The St. Louis line is the most surprising.

You’d figure Pujols was worth like 25% on his own.

"What we do in life, echoes in eternity!"

by Justin Bopp on Oct 8, 2009 10:25 AM EDT reply actions  

St. Louis

Of all of the teams, St. Louis may be the one I’m underestimating the most, simply because the team quality estimate is based on season stats, and they are not the same team they were before they acquired Holliday et al mid-season. The Phillies are similar, though, in that they only had Cliff Lee for a half-season. The Twins might be overestimated due to the loss of Morneau. etc, etc.

These are imperfect estimates for those and a number of other reasons. But I tend to think that they’re better estimates of who will win the match-ups than if you went strictly based on team wins, for example.
-j

by JinAZ on Oct 8, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think its a game by game basis

and its pretty accurate then. For the series, I had them at about 26% before yesterday, and about 16% now.

by lookatthosetwins on Oct 8, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Anyone know the Vegas lines for the series's?

Jeff Zimmerman - Protecting the world from RBI's and Wins from my mom's guest house.

by Jeff Zimmerman on Oct 8, 2009 1:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Vegas Watch

http://vegaswatch.net/2009/10/ds-previews.html

Are “Pinnacle Series” lines the vegas lines? I don’t gamble, so I don’t really know how to read those.
-j

by JinAZ on Oct 8, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dammit, don't know how to read those either

Where’s Pete Rose when you need him?

Jeff Zimmerman - Protecting the world from RBI's and Wins from my mom's guest house.

by Jeff Zimmerman on Oct 8, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

-152 means you need to bet 152 dollars to make 100
+152 means you will win 152 dollars if you bet 100.

It’s pretty ridiculous, you need different formulas for the + vs. the -.

by lookatthosetwins on Oct 8, 2009 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

also, there will be a gap,

so the odds will be like 125 for one team and 115 for another. That’s how they guarantee their money. So I’d take the average of them (120) to decide what the odds are. 120/(100120)= .5455 for the "" team, 4545 for the “+” team. Hope that helps.

by lookatthosetwins on Oct 9, 2009 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks Pete, I will hopefully get the odds figure out sometime today.

Jeff Zimmerman - Protecting the world from RBI's and Wins from my mom's guest house.

by Jeff Zimmerman on Oct 9, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm confused

Is this for a 5-game series? Surely the percentage numbers are more exaggerated away from 50% in longer series.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 8, 2009 3:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Free Agent Compensation
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
Strike_three2_small
Effect of Foul Area on Strikeouts: AL 1954-68: Erratum
Small
Baseball on a stick
Small
Player Evaluating Statistic
Baseball_small
Rays Outfield: Cheap but Extremely Productive
Small
A new xBABIP
Small
Jack Morris "pitching to the score"
Strike_three2_small
Foul Area and Differences in SO: AL vs NL
Baseball_small
Is there a Kuroda and Oswalt Alternative?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Picture-6_small Chris St. John

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung