Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2011 In Extreme Home Runs

BtB Power Rankings Season Review: AL West

We now turn our attention to the AL West.  As a reminder, you can access all of the data I'm citing in the 2009 end of season power rankings.

7. Los Angeles Angels. TQI = 0.549

The Angels are sort of the opposite of the Cleveland Indians (see yesterday's post), in that they always seem to overperform their component statistics.  In this case, we're estimating their component W% at 0.525, compared to their true record of 0.599.  The reason is a large disparity on both offense and defense.  Our estimated runs scored total is 32 shy of their actual total, while estimated runs allowed was a whopping 50 more than reality.  Why?  The run scored disparity matches up well to FanGraphs' team clutch score of +26 runs (though that's because, in part, I'm using some of the same data).  And on defense, tERA is 0.2 runs higher than actual ERA (FIP is intermediate), despite the Angels having slightly below-average fielding (due to the catching).  I don't know what to believe--the power rankings, or the Angels' record.  My guess is that their true talent is somewhere in between.  What I do know is that this is a different kind of Angels team--they have an outstanding offense, but are actually a bit below average in pitching and fielding.

Star-divide

8. Texas Rangers.  TQI = 0.543

The Rangers battled all year, and ended up well shy of the Angels' near-0.600 mark.  In the power rankings, they essentially swapped spaces every other week, ending the season just shy of of the Angels' mark.  We actually estimated their cW% slightly below their actual winning percentage.  Our runs scored estimate was 33 shy of reality.  But we also estimated that they'd allow 14 runs fewer than they did, which keeps their cW% close to the actual mark.  This is the first Rangers team I can remember that is built more for pitching and fielding than offense. Their hitters were just average, at least after park adjustments.  But their pitching was also average, which, with their plus fielding, resulted in an above-average team.  

 

9. Oakland Athletics.  TQI = 0.533

 

Somehow I didn't noticed that the Athletics had crept all the way up to 9th in the power rankings, just behind the Rangers.  Early in the year, the Athletics were near the bottom of the American league, both in the power rankings and in the actual standings.  From about the time they traded away Matt Holliday, however, the A's started to rise in the rankings a few places at a time.  And then, in September, they posted a brilliant 0.630 winning percentage, shooting up the rankings in parallel with the Mariners.  The 2009 Athletics were an average hitting team with slightly below average fielding.  Their pitching, however, finished very strong, led by rookie of the year candidates Brett Anderson and Andrew Bailey.

 

17. Seattle Mariners. TQI = 0.487

 

The Mariners were the best-fielding team in the major leagues this year.  I have them at +80 runs above average, including catching, which is actually a bit conservative--UZR has them at +85 runs, without even including their plus catching.  The number that's most striking to me about this is their pitcher's BABIP--just 0.280.  Their pitchers, however, were slightly below average overall (despite King Felix), and their hitting was well short of the mark. As a result, like their pW% (0.464), their cW% (0.461) is quite a bit shy of their actual record.  I know they're feeling excited in Seattle right now, but my feeling is that some of that is unfortunately a mirage. 

 

BtB Power Rankings 2009 End of Season Data

Team by Team reviews: AL East | AL Central | AL West | NL East | NL Central | NL West

 

Comment 17 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

What do you make of

the Angels offense vis-a-vis their team BABIP of .322? Hunter, Aybar, Morales, Izturis, and Napoli had career high BABIP years. On the other hand, Figgins, Abreu, and Kendrick had high BABIPs but they are hitters that usually do. Do you view this as a near 900 run offense, or did they clearly overperform?

by Buzzy on Oct 14, 2009 10:40 AM EDT reply actions  

Good points all

Not that it’s all that determines BABIP, but the Angels’ LD% was a fairly average 18.1 this year, whereas their BABIP leads all of baseball. That certainly supports you case.

Here are PrOPS vs. OPS numbers for the Angels’ qualified batters:

Morales PrOPS 0.854 vs. OPS 0.924
Rivera PrOPS 0.843 vs. OPS 0.810
Hunter PrOPS 0.830 vs. OPS 0.873
Abreu PrOPS 0.811 vs OPS 0.825
Figgins PrOPS 0.762 vs. OPS 0.789
Aybar ProPS 0.704 vs. OPS 0.776

PrOPS isn’t perfect either, and I don’t think PrOPS knows anything about baserunning (though I could be wrong). But aside from Rivera all of these players overperformed their PrOPS, which, generally speaking, indicates “luck.”

Anyway, all of this is to say that I think you might be right. :) I think they’re still a good offense, but it could absolutely be the case that they overperformed….which would make “my” estimates of their team performance even more pessimistic than they actually are!
-j

by JinAZ on Oct 14, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Angel's stadium defaltes LD% very heavily

It has a park factor of less than .90 last time I checked. Or did you apply batted ball factors to your rankings?

by vivaelpujols on Oct 14, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Batted ball park factors are only applied to tRA, not offense

For offense I’m just using a classic runs-level park correction. For the Angels, it’s 0.99.

You’d still expect BABIP to follow LD% as it is suppressed, right?
-j

by JinAZ on Oct 14, 2009 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

And

you would expect that whatever bias there is does not change year-to-year comparison. But the Angels LD% is the same this year and last, however their BABIP is 0.22 points higher this year.

by Buzzy on Oct 14, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think LDs are actually supressed

It’s just that the classifications are going to be biased against LDs.

by vivaelpujols on Oct 14, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

So it's a stringer issue?

In that case, we’d expect LD% to vary depending on the data source? i.e. BIS vs. MLBAM?
-j

by JinAZ on Oct 14, 2009 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I believe

it led all other AL offenses by 0.14 points-which is a lot. I could be wrong. Last year the Rangers had a 0.329, which fell back to normal this year. Aside from rather obvious factors (Hamilton/Bradley) that must be in part responsible from a decrease in runs by over 100.

by Buzzy on Oct 14, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

How many analysts out there

are going to be picking the A’s to win the AL West next year?

|Space for Rent|

by RangerMad on Oct 14, 2009 12:11 PM EDT reply actions  

After their experience THIS season?

Zero. Even the sabr-people are going to have been scared off.

I think they actually have a decent shot at it, but it’s going to take an awful lot of prospect growth and some kind of productive short-term solution at third base.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 19, 2009 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Img_3830_small
BtBS Fantasy League
Small
Context Neutral Run and RBI projections
Small
Free Agent Compensation
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
Strike_three2_small
Effect of Foul Area on Strikeouts: AL 1954-68: Erratum
Small
Baseball on a stick
Small
Player Evaluating Statistic
Baseball_small
Rays Outfield: Cheap but Extremely Productive
Small
A new xBABIP
Small
Jack Morris "pitching to the score"

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Picture-6_small Chris St. John

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung