A's and Giambi Reunite
Outstanding contract alert! Outstanding contract alert! Just a day after Pat Burrell and Milton Bradley inked deals, Jason Giambi returns to Oakland. Giambi returning to the place where he was lionized as one of baseball's best sluggers during the past decade. It's an appropriate reconciliation, and comes on a contract with a base of one-year and 4.5 million. A club option for 5 million in 2010 isn't quite what Giambi was reportedly hoping for (a three year contract), but then again, perhaps Oakland was the exception to that demand.
The A's endured a somewhat disappointing Daric Barton campaign in 2008, but will now have a bit of a quandary on their hands. Neither Giambi nor Jack Cust should ever wear non-batting glove, but now one will have to in order to utilize both. Giambi seems like the lesser poison at first base, might the Athletics implement a platoon based on their pitcher's tendencies? For instance, when Dana Eveland is pitching (a heavy fly ball pitcher) play Cust at DH and field your best outfield defense. When a groundballer is playing, let Cust mosey in the outfield and put the plus-defender Barton get some reps.
In any matter, the contractual expectation of Giambi is to produce 0.8 wins. Worth 2.6 last season, 0.5 in 2007, and 3.4 in 2006 Giambi is up for the task. Of course Giambi was also worth 36 batting runs in 2006 and that's simply not happening in 2009, but even if we average his past two seasons Giambi averages ~1.5 WAR, which seems like a safe bet for 2009. If that does indeed come to pass, Giambi will earn the Athletics three million in gain.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The only problem with Giambi's WAR
is that you’re not taking into account who he’s replacing. If you just compare his WAR to his contract, it is a great signing. However, Barton should (key word) be able to produce over replacement level as well, and I don’t think adding Giambi over Barton is going to upgrade the team as much as one might think (considering the defensive differences between the two). In a vacuum, this is a great signing, but with Barton already on the team to play 1b, it’s not nearly as good of a deal for the A’s.
"I'm on hold for now"- Bobby Crosby
I agree. Furcal would have been a much more important addition, even at his higher price.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
shoot, or even Orlando Cabrera
I don’t see (other than payroll) why the A’s don’t go for O Cab. He represents anywhere from 1-2 wins above Crosby, doesn’t block a prospect/youngster, and I don’t think he’d cost an arm and a leg (well, maybe just an arm). I personally think Barton is likely to regress towards his mean (aka, get better), and adding Cabrera along with Barton’s improvement is probably worth more than replacing half of Barton’s AB’s with Giambi’s AB’s. Of course, O Cab costs a 2nd round pick, but unless his salary demands are outrageous, I believe its worth it.
"I'm on hold for now"- Bobby Crosby
by DyeLongJustice on Jan 7, 2009 4:42 PM EST up reply actions
I'm assuming they'll split time at first.
Which would allow Barton to get some playing time as well.
by R.J. Anderson on Jan 7, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions

by 

















