Behold, The Power of the Glove!
Now that Michael Young of the Texas Rangers has begrudgingly moved to third base, the team will give top prospect Elvis Andrus the opportunity to win the starting shortstop job for the 2009 season. But, as any team would do, they've decided to bring in a veteran as insurance in case the 20-year-old prospect might need some additional seasoning in the minors. That veteran is 11-time Gold Glove winner Omar Vizquel. Yes, that Vizquel who hit: .222/.283/.267 in 2008 for the San Francisco Giants. Not many hitters in Major League Baseball were worse at the plate than Omar was last season -- KC's Tony Pena and his OPS+ of 7 holds the title of worst overall hitter. But, while Omar declined at the dish, he was as smooth as ever in the field.
That brings us to today's question: Does Omar Vizquel's glove lift his total value enough to break the replacement level barrier?
To get started, let's take a quick look at a plot of Vizquel's performances on offense and defense from 2005-2008. This should help us get an idea of where Vizquel is heading as a player.
| Year | wRAA | bUZR |
| 2005 | -7.5 | 10.1 |
| 2006 | 1.2 | 6.7 |
| 2007 | -26.5 | 19.9 |
| 2008 | -23.1 | 5.3 |
A quick note on the stats we are looking at. wRAA is FanGraphs' version of batting runs above average. It's park adjusted and the offensive measure of how many runs a player was worth by his bat alone. bUZR is the BIS data version of Ultimate Zone Rating which can also be found at FanGraphs. It's how many runs above or below average a player saved with his glove.
You can see that from 2006 to 2007 Omar crashed at the plate. He went from slightly above average in '06 to -20 runs below average in both '07 and '08. It's not entirely surprising when you consider that these are his age 40 and 41 seasons. Over his career, Omar has aged quite well but eventually, it was going to start to catch up with him. In 2007 he accrued 575 PA's but in 2008, he only totaled 300 PA's because of knee problems that delayed his start of the season.
What I find interesting is that despite his bat collapsing, he's still quite good in the field. He was a +10 defender in '05 and in '07, he saved nearly +20 runs on defense. That's amazing when you consider the peer group he's competing against. Shortstops as a group are some of the most athletic defenders on the baseball field, and Omar was still outplaying them on defense by his late-30's and early-40's. He dropped to +5.3 runs above average in 2008 but that's partly due to his reduced playing time. He missed all of April and didn't play until May 10th. His bUZR/150 -- or his bUZR prorated to 150 games -- was +13.8 runs above average.
Projecting for 2009
Back to our initial question, let's see how Omar projects for the 2009 season. A few quick assumptions that I'm making:
- I'm using the CHONE projections for both offense and defense.
- I've set the league wOBA to .332
- Omar will probably take on a utility role for the Rangers, but he should still see most of his time at shortstop. For the WAR positional adjustment, I've got Omar playing 75% of his playing time at shortstop and another 25% at second base. This makes his positional adjustment worth 6.25 runs.
- Replacement level is set to 22.5 runs.
- All my table values are in wins.
| Batting | -3.13 |
| Defense | 1.1 |
| Position | 0.625 |
| Replacement | 2.25 |
| Total | 0.845 |
Omar projects to nearly a +1 win player all things considered. But, that projection assumes that he'll be reaching 700 PA's, which isn't going to happen. If we adjust his playing time to around 280 PA's we get the following: .845 WAR * (.4) = .338 or +.39 wins above replacement. If we call Omar a +.5 WAR player, then he should be valued at something like $2.5M on the market. The Rangers have brought him in with a NRI contract, which I assume is for the league minimum. It's not a bad deal for the Rangers. Omar can provide some Veteran Tutoring™ for young Andrus and replacing Hank Blalock/Chris Davis with Young at third base should improve the left-side of the infield's defense.
I watched Omar Vizquel hit and field for most of the 2008 season and I think if you asked the casual fan if they thought he had any value, you'd get a mixed response. Some would see his weak bat and want nothing to do with him and others might value his defense somewhat properly. I think most would be surprised to learn that Omar's glove does help him break the replacement level and that my friends, is the power of the glove.
Edit: As per Sky's suggestion, I'm adding a plot depicting the basic replacement level and the replacement level for shortstops compared to Vizquel's performance. Everything is prorated to 700 PA's and ODP is the sum of offense, defense, and positional adjustment. Thanks go out to Sky for some spreadsheet help.
The drop off is pretty stark, but that's what happens when your bat is evaporating. Still, Omar should break the WAR threshold next season if his defense is as good as CHONE has it projected to be and his bat bounces back to the .260-.270 wOBA range.
1 recs |
20 comments
|
Comments
Awesome. As usual, I like the graph.
How about adding a line at -22.5 runs pro-rated to the number of PAs Vizquel had to show replacement-level hitting for the average position and (-22.5+7.5) runs pro-rated to Vizquel’s PAs to show rep-level hitting for shortstops? And maybe a total value line combing wRAA and bUZR? Or might that be crowded?
It’s cool how close Vizquel now fits the definition of what researchers have found to be true of utility players. They tend to hit at replacement-level with slightly above-average gloves. Bingo. That’s the contract and role Vizquel gets…
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Jan 21, 2009 11:16 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I like that idea. I’ll get back to my Excel sometime this afternoon and I’ll see if I can create something like that.
by xanthan on Jan 21, 2009 11:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Omar is the reason that I know that there is such thing as a negative OPS+.
I'm spent, just can't rosterbate anymore.
by oldjacket on Jan 21, 2009 11:21 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Worst OPS+ in history, >200 PA, non-pitcher
Frank O’Rourke in 1912, -11. There were 5 seasons as bad or worse than Tony Pena’s 2008 OPS+.
When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realized God doesn’t work that way, so I stole one and prayed for forgiveness. - Emo Philips
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Jan 21, 2009 3:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like that you have to go back near 100 years to find a season as bad as Tony Pena’s 2008.
by xanthan on Jan 21, 2009 4:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Insane, right?
He defined suck.
Tony Pena, 2008:
.169/.189/.209, OPS+ 7
Brian Bocock, 2008:
.143/.258/.156, OPS+ 12
Outhit by Brian Bocock. It probably feels like a kick in the Bocock.
When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realized God doesn’t work that way, so I stole one and prayed for forgiveness. - Emo Philips
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Jan 21, 2009 5:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh man.
I can’t believe this guy outhit someone:

by R.J. Anderson on Jan 21, 2009 5:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I know! I think I wrote him a complimentary fanpost for it too.
Shame. I feel shame.
I'm spent, just can't rosterbate anymore.
by oldjacket on Jan 21, 2009 7:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm surprised..
That Vizquel would even consider a non-roster contract. Sure he wants to play still, but I’d think that somewhere he could get a full contract. He’d probably still be a utility player, and on the Rangers there’s probably a better chance of getting more playing time, but I think I’d take the better contract with a better team if I were him.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
by WalrusMan on Jan 21, 2009 11:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I dunno, the market is pretty tough right now and Omar isn’t exactly wowing people with the bat. It probably depends on how much teams value his defense. He should probably make the Rangers as utility player than can help Andrus make the transition. At this point, any playing time is better than no playing time at all.
by xanthan on Jan 21, 2009 11:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You've got to believe there's a good chance Elvis doesn't play even 2/3 of the season, let alone 155 games.
Vizquel’s not a bad, cheap SS alternative.
Looks like the Rangers are learning about defense. MY to third, Elvis at short, and Vizquel backing up Elvis/Kinsler, are a significant improvement. Byrd to center in place of Hamilton, and a pitcher or two would actually put the Rangers right in the hunt for the AL West.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Jan 21, 2009 11:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You could say that again =)
a pitcher or two would actually put the Rangers right in the hunt for the AL West.
Give me Sheets or give me Offseason Blues Part III.
by Chase Irwin on Jan 21, 2009 10:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's one thing though..
It’d probably be tough for Vizquel to try and adapt to the 2B position. In the majors, he’s only started at SS, while in one game he stood at 2B for an inning and didn’t make any plays and in another game he stood in RF for an inning and didn’t make any plays.
I wonder, are there that many players in the majors who have only played one position entirely? For a 15+ major league career how many players make it through just playing a single position? You’d think at some point there would be an emergency start needed somewhere else on the diamond.
Just looking around a bit, looks like it’s not that uncommon, but it always seems to me like on baseball sim games I move my players around a lot more.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
by WalrusMan on Jan 21, 2009 11:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Reply to myself..
I posted this over at the Chronicles since it looks like he’s been signed now to the deal.
It looks like he’s almost a lock to make the team out of ST unless he really stinks the place up. Perhaps it was just a situation where it was either a non roster deal that was nearly a lock for a million or a roster deal that was the minor league minimum.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
by WalrusMan on Jan 21, 2009 10:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So when will Michael Young complain about being disrespected?
“What, I can’t touch Elvis how to play short?”
by R.J. Anderson on Jan 21, 2009 11:57 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Touch?! Does someone have something else on their mind?
by VictorW on Jan 21, 2009 1:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great work!
I had done this estimate myself a while ago, but not nearly as thoroughly as you. This is definitely getting posted to LSB.
Thanks!
by philkid3 on Jan 21, 2009 2:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The shape of that last graph is alarming, but thankfully "trending" doesn't mean much in baseball.
An age-adjusted weighted average of past performance is the way to go, and Vizquel does appear to be above replacement-level by a bit going forward.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Jan 21, 2009 3:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs















BtB on Facebook















