The Worst Season of Francisco Rodriguez's Career

Furthermore, Rodriguez’s strikeouts have been declining ever since his incredible season back in 2004.
|
K/9 |
BB/9 |
xFIP |
|
|
2004 |
13.2 |
3.5 |
2.63 |
|
2005 |
12.2 |
4.3 |
2.97 |
|
2006 |
12.1 |
3.5 |
3.22 |
|
2007 |
12 |
4.5 |
3.53 |
|
2008 |
10.3 |
4.5 |
3.58 |
Of course, 10.3 strikeouts per nine is still very good. But it’s not at the same rate as the rest of his career. Rodriguez has always walked a lot of batters; this wasn’t a problem when he was striking out 12 batters per nine, but his high walk totals could become more problematic if he’s not able to raise his strikeout totals once again.
If we look even deeper at K-Rod’s repertoire, we find even more troublesome data. Fangraphs gives velocity data going back to 2005 – for Rodriguez, we can see that his fastball velocity is only 91.8 MPH this year, as compared to 93.6, 94.8, and 93.3 MPH over the last three years. Additionally, K-Rod has lost some of the velocity and bite on his devastating slider – so much so, in fact, that pitch F/X has classified many of his breaking pitches as curve balls this year, rather than sliders.
Last season, pitch F/X clocked Rodriguez’s slider at 82.29 MPH, whereas this season the same pitch is clocked at only 80.21 MPH. Furthermore, K-Rod’s slider in 2007 was a lot tighter last year than it is this year: last year, he got four inches of downward break on the pitch, whereas this year he has gotten only one inch of downward break. He has actually gotten more break away from right-handed batters this year – 6.6 inches, as compared to 4.8 inches last year. However, the two-plane break that K-Rod had been getting on his devastating slider is diminished, and, as such, the pitch is not as dominating as it used to be.
Rodriguez is still very difficult to hit against, due to the tremendous amount of movement on his pitches. However, this year his control problems have been even worse than in the past: only 60% of his pitches have been strikes – the lowest total of his career – and only 54% of his first pitches have been strikes. He has gotten into more 3-0 counts (9% of the time) than any other season in his career, and has gotten into fewer 0-2 counts (19%) than any other season. His overall strikeout rate is down, and yet he has received more called third strikes than usual this year, suggesting even less dominance (as evidenced by the relative lack of swings and misses with two strikes).
Finally, Rodriguez has fared exceptionally well this season with runners on base, thus limiting the amount of runs that he has given up. In his career, K-Rod has been slightly better with runners on (.543 OPS against) than with nobody on base (.600 OPS against). This season, however, K-Rod’s OPS with runners on base (.498) is much lower than his OPS with no one on (.717), thus leading to an inordinately low number of runners who reach base scoring.
Rodriguez has still been very good this year; but, save total aside, he has also been very lucky. His ability to throw strikes and his fastball velocity are both down. His slider is less tight than it used to be – it’s no longer getting the two-plane break that it was getting before, and it’s being thrown at a slower velocity. These are all very troublesome signs, and they’re coupled with a lower strikeout rate (and a still-high walk rate).
It’s very possible that K Rod’s “struggles” this season are due to the fluke of a small sample size. Relievers pitch so few innings in a given season that it’s very easy for their results to fluctuate while their actual skill remains the same. And Rodriguez has still had a good season (although not nearly as good of a season has his save totals and ERA might suggest).
However, Rodriguez does not appear to be the same pitcher that he was over the last four years. His apparent decline is definitely something to consider in the wake of his impending free agency.
1 recs |
32 comments
Comments
That's such a straight declining pattern
I’m very interested to see if it continues into next year.
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 4, 2008 10:24 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Also, K-Rod has the highest LD% of his career.
Coincidence or no?
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 4, 2008 12:00 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
How does 2008 K-Rod compare to every other pitcher, not to K-Rods past?
That is the question each GM will have to ask.
Two quick points: Frankie had a terrible ankle injury in mid-April thru mid-May AND he introduced a changeup to his repertoire about a month ago. Struck out A-Rod looking in early August with it the first time he threw it in the bigs.
by Rev Halofan on
Sep 4, 2008 1:03 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not so sure about that.
You’re paying for Rodriguez’ services, if he’s going to use his irrelevant save totals and track record to get however much he wants you better know you’re getting the high performance K-Rod and if he’s on a downward trend you really shouldn’t pay him.
1. That doesn’t explain the downward trend over the past few years.
2. A batter didn’t recognize a new pitch from a seasoned pitcher? Why am I not surprised?
by R.J. Anderson on
Sep 4, 2008 1:45 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
If Rodriguez is expecting to get top dollar as a FA, his value—even if he stays where he is instead of declining further—won’t be worth the millions of difference between him and someone else who can get three outs for 70 innings a year. I highly doubt Rodriguez’s downward trend has much to do with the ankle injury. And an anecdote about a changup is just that…it’s worth paying attention to see if he can replicate that success, but it’s nothing conclusive.
A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.
by NHZ on
Sep 5, 2008 3:27 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i agree that we really care about KRod relative to other pitchers going forward
and something like xFIP is a good way to do that.
problems with xFIP, however, include the fact that it assumes the same HR/FB rate for all pitchers, which isn’t exactly true; and that relievers are able to post slightly lower BABIP rates.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 4, 2008 5:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
tRA is a better tool than xFIP
Yesterday's Pants
A blog-thingy about the Mariners and stuff.
by BrettJMiller on
Sep 4, 2008 8:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
good call
here are KRod’s tRAs on a “tERA” scale (tRA minus .30 runs) for those who don’t want to follow the link:
2003: 3.80
2004: 1.73
2005: 3.03
2006: 2.40
2007: 2.70
2008: 3.24
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 4, 2008 8:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That really is an alarming trend.
Brad Lidge had a similar downward trend in K/9, and a slightly more volatile BB/9 from 2004 through 2007. I’m no good at tables, but his K/9 went from 14.93 to 11.82 over that period, and the BB/9 went from 2.85 to 4.03. His K/9 leveled off this year, while the BB/9 rose to 4.50.
What’s so striking about K-Rod is the consistency of the xFIP and K/9 trends. Yuck.
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
by misterjonez on
Sep 4, 2008 1:34 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Is 2003 not a part of K-Rod's career anymore?
Because I’m pretty sure that 2008 still beats it hands down.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Sep 4, 2008 5:52 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
As the worst?
K-Rod has allowed almost as many baserunners in 50 fewer inning this season.
by JI on
Sep 4, 2008 6:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Fewer K/9, worse FIP, WAY more homers = more runs and therefore a worse season.
Also, 50 innings? 86-59 = 50?
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Sep 4, 2008 7:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Almost forgot- tRA says 2008 > 2003, at least so far.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Sep 4, 2008 8:38 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
my guess is that Peter left it off because Hardball Times (which posts xFIP) doesn't go back to 2003
but you’re right that it’s a deceivingly convenient cut-off. I’m not sure Peter’s overall point that KRod’s peripherals are generally declining over the past few seasons. It’s also fair to point out the injury he fought through earlier in the year — that doesn’t make his season any better, but it does brighten the outlook for the future.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 4, 2008 7:47 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I just think "worst" is a misnomer.
In terms of actual production, it’s easily one of his best. His predictive indicators are at a low point compared with previous seasons, but they aren’t that far away from just seasonal variation, and when you take his injury and the mechanical change into account, along with the fact that this season isn’t technically over yet… it just seems like this topic is overstating the case in general, and leaving a lot of things out to make it appear worse than it is.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Sep 4, 2008 8:07 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
does the fact that 2003 was his worst really change things, though?
as far as the predictive indicators vs. production things go, in general the predictive things are what KRod can control and the productive things are a combination of the predictive things, team input, and “luck”. the predictive things aren’t just useful going forward — they describe (again, making a vague generalization) how much of the production should be credited to KRod.
i think KRod’s injury is an important point, especially when you look at his K/9 splits by month (better later in the season.) thanks to Angels fans for pointing that out.
but the injury doesn’t make KRod’s season any better (or worse). it just makes his projection a bit brighter — provides an explanation for why his performance was a bit down this year, which shouldn’t exist next year.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 4, 2008 8:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But that's just it-
His “performance” hasn’t been down at all. Good ERA, save rate over 90%, only 2 games where he gave up the losing run- these are perfectly good numbers and far from the worst of his career, especially when you consider his staggeringly high leverage index.
His predictive indicators are at a low point, but that’s some the different, at least in my mind, from his actual performance over the course of the season.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Sep 4, 2008 8:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Missed this line the first time through-
they describe (again, making a vague generalization) how much of the production should be credited to KRod.
I’ve never been sure how much of this logic I buy. It’s predicated on the belief that if you played the season say, a million times, certain numbers would remain consistent while others would fluctuate wildly—and that’s fine as far a prediction goes. But I’m of the opinion that what actually HAPPENS trumps theory; whatever kind of season he SHOULD have had, or would have on average if played an infinite number of times, is immaterial once the event has already occurred. What happened is what happened and the actual result, in my opinion, is what measures the kind of season they had.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Sep 4, 2008 8:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
let's break this down a bit.
where do you stand on crediting a reliever for these things:
- giving up a line-drive right at a player
- giving up a line-drive ten fee wide of a player
- allowing a walk then a homerun versus a homerun then a walk
- allowing 2 runs with a three run lead and no runs with a 1 run lead versus vice versa
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 4, 2008 8:38 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Just any reliever or a closer?
In my mind, a closer’s job is a bit different than another relievers. Obviously you want to do it with minimal hazard, but ultimately ALL that matters during a save situation, for a closer, is that the team wins. You can trade outs for runs, if you have them to give up, and it doesn’t matter. Of course, the pressure that comes with the job has been known to take it’s toll on some players.
A closer is fairly unique in this capacity. In a one run game, you want them to give up no runs. In a three run game, you want them to give up no runs, but it doesn’t really matter if they give up one or two. Strategy for closers on the mound can vary a great deal based on the situation because of this unique position they’re in.
To answer your questions though
-it depends on what kind of pitch it was. A diving curveball off the plate that Vlad somehow manages to smash at the right fielder can’t really be blamed on the pitcher.
-see above
-I’d prefer the second one, since it means fewer runs scored.
-no runs is prefereable, but the result is the same.
Now just because I prefer results doesn’t mean peripherals can be totally ignored. A 40+ save season does not make Joe Borrowski a good closer.
As far as awarding Wins to closers, that doesn’t seem fair, since they don’t score any runs, but I think penalizing for losses is fair- you are supposed to be the best reliever on your team, and clearly the game was tied when you entered. I like using WXRL by baseball prospectus, since it’s basically fangraphs Win probability added with adjustments for lineups faced and other things.
you have to back up from the team results to what the players can control to some degree. i think our disagreement is to what degree we do this. no?
This is essentially correct.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Sep 4, 2008 9:06 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
taking your point of view to the extreme (which I'm not saying you agree with)...
why not just credit relievers (and starters and second basemen) with Wins and Losses, since those are the real results that matter? that doesn’t make sense, right? you have to back up from the team results to what the players can control to some degree. i think our disagreement is to what degree we do this. no?
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 4, 2008 8:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
looking at Peter's table above...
i think i can agree with you that this season isn’t drastically worse than previous years if you account for the injury. there’s certainly some hyperbole in the title, but it’s all a nice reminder that the saves total is misleading and he HAS pitched worse than over the past few years.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 4, 2008 8:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
As an A's fan,
it is my official position that I hope Anaheim ponies up the big bucks to re-sign him next season. i don’t believe he’ll be worth it.
Not that I’d be heartbroken if they don’t. The man personifies the word “douchebag” to an almost unbelievable degree.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Sep 5, 2008 4:00 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
His post-save Celebration makes me want to hang myself.
All I can think of is “motherfucker, if the other team was smart enough to never swing ever you’d blow every save by walking the god damn world” K-Rod is one of my top 5 most hated players of all time.
Yesterday's Pants
A blog-thingy about the Mariners and stuff.
by BrettJMiller on
Sep 5, 2008 4:02 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
For years I've been arguing that he can't throw 3 breaking balls for a strike in any given at bat
I know hitting isn’t as simple as I’m going to make it here, but if a hitter only looks fastball and only swings at the perfectly straight fastball over the middle of the plate, K-Rod isn’t just beatable, he’s bad. If he manages to put 3 sliders over the plate for a strike, good for him. Go sit down. But he just doesn’t do that very often. More likely, he’s going to walk a hitter and then challenge the next guy with a 92 mph fastball that doesn’t move a whole lot.
by thejd44 on
Sep 5, 2008 12:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thoughts
Wow! Thanks to everyone who has commented on this story – this has to be a record for comments at BTB, at least in the last year or so. I will try to address several points, made by different people throughout the comments:
I don’t think save totals are relevant to whether a pitcher has performed well or not. Yes, you need to be a decent pitcher to accumulate saves, but I’m sure we all remember Joe Borowski. Saves are much more about pitcher usage than pitcher ability, and while better relievers tend to get more saves, I do not think we should use saves to judge a pitcher’s ability, at all.
"Ultimately ALL that matters during a save situation, for a closer, is that the team wins. You can trade outs for runs, if you have them to give up, and it doesn’t matter."
Ultimately, ALL a pitcher can do is get outs. He can’t control the situation in which he is being used, he can only control how fast he can throw the ball, where he places the ball, and what kind of break he gets on the ball. I do not believe that pitchers have shown the aptitude to "pitch to the score" – unless, perhaps, the score is extremely lopsided. If your team is ahead by three runs, you aren’t grooving every fastball right down the middle – three runs is still a close game. Thus, discounting runs given up that ultimately didn’t lead to a loss is misleading (again, with the possible exception of extremely lopsided games). K-Rod shouldn’t get a free pass for the amount of runs he’s given up if he "happens" to give up two runs with a three run lead: he wasn’t "trying" to give these runs up.
As for his ankle injury and the addition of a changeup to his repertoire: the ankle injury could indeed be dragging his numbers down, but his velocity on September 2 was almost exactly the same as his velocity on April 2, according to Brooksbaseball . Yes, his K/BB ratio was amazing in August, but I don’t necessarily consider that an upward trend – especially since it hasn’t been accompanied by increased velocity – so much as a small-sample-size fluke (to be fair, his 9/9 ratio in April was just as much of a fluke; the truth lies somewhere in the middle). I don’t think his struggles can be blamed at all on the ankle injury.
The addition of a changeup is a welcome sight for Rodriguez, but has nothing to do with his struggles this year, nor his lower velocity – in fact, his decision to integrate the changeup most likely stems DIRECTLY FROM these issues.
Finally, I will admit to some artistic hyperbole in the headline, but I stick to what the headline actually says: this IS K-Rod’s worst season of his illustrious career to date, but that doesn’t mean it’s a BAD season. My point is not that the sky is falling, but rather that K-Rod doesn’t appear to be as good as he has been, but most people don’t realize it because of his gaudy save totals, as well as luck which has kept his ERA lower than it "should" be.
by Peter Bendix on
Sep 5, 2008 1:53 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Some disagreements-
“I do not believe that pitchers have shown the aptitude to "pitch to the score” – unless, perhaps, the score is extremely lopsided. If your team is ahead by three runs, you aren’t grooving every fastball right down the middle – three runs is still a close game."
I don’t know about pitchers in general, but I do know that Frankie Rodriguez does change how he pitches based on the score. You don’t have to do anything accept look at his game log to know that. When does K-Rod tend to give up runs? When the lead is more than 1. Of his 5 blown saves, only 1 has come in a 1-run game, and he’s only given up the losing run in a tied game once. This out of 11 games where a run has scored while he is on the mound.
And it’s not like he hasn’t had chances to blow 1-run leads- 24 of his 65 appearances have come with either a one run lead or with the game tied. This is because K-Rod is more likely to come after guys in situations where he has more of a cushion.
As for his ankle injury and the addition of a changeup to his repertoire: the ankle injury could indeed be dragging his numbers down, but his velocity on September 2 was almost exactly the same as his velocity on April 2, according to Brooksbaseball . Yes, his K/BB ratio was amazing in August, but I don’t necessarily consider that an upward trend – especially since it hasn’t been accompanied by increased velocity – so much as a small-sample-size fluke (to be fair, his 9/9 ratio in April was just as much of a fluke; the truth lies somewhere in the middle). I don’t think his struggles can be blamed at all on the ankle injury.
Except that the average fastball speed that Brooks Baseball claims for him is 92.9 on both dates, which would be perfectly consistent with a 92-94 MPH fastball, as opposed to the 91.8 average speed claimed by fangraphs. Also, the big ankle injury for K-Rod came on April 6th when he fell down the dugout steps, just prior to his outing on April 7th where Cleveland lit him up. His average fastball speed on that day was 91.5. When he came back, he initially looked okay, averaging 92.47 on the 13th, but fell to 91.15 and then to 90.98 on the following two days, followed by 91.86 on the 17th. On the 18th he ratcheted it back up to 92.8. It hit sub-91 one more time on the 25th and I don’t think it has done so since.
I think based on this it’s fair to say that his injury was affecting him, at least in April. After that of course, his K and BB rates started to normalize, culminating in a really good month in August.
As far as “struggles” though, I’m not sure I’ve seen any, post-April. He really only had the one bad month, and after that it’s been business as usual.
I also don’t see how this season is worse than ‘03 at the very least. You’ll have to explain that one.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Sep 6, 2008 7:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i disagree with this argument...
I don’t know about pitchers in general, but I do know that Frankie Rodriguez does change how he pitches based on the score. You don’t have to do anything accept look at his game log to know that. When does K-Rod tend to give up runs? When the lead is more than 1. Of his 5 blown saves, only 1 has come in a 1-run game, and he’s only given up the losing run in a tied game once. This out of 11 games where a run has scored while he is on the mound.
That’s circular reasoning. Just because KRod has given up runs when it’s mattered less doesn’t mean that he has a skill for it. You haven’t shown it’s anything more than a fluke. I’m sure there’s some skill to this that all pitchers have to varying degrees (having to do with focus, most likely), but it’s nowhere near this big of an effect.
If you have the time/desire, it would be nice to go through all of KRod’s saves from the past few years and divide them by 1, 2, and 3 run leads and note how many runs he gives up in each situation. if you only included full-inning 9th-inning saves, you could probably automate it in Excel.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 7, 2008 10:49 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, maybe YOU could automate it. >_>;
My spreadsheet skills fall somewhere between minuscule and zilch. I can fill them out manually, but that’s about it. ;-)
However, I would be willing to look into it. I think that your full inning pitched qualifier needs to be re-thought though. After all, if a closer gives up the loss on a close game on the road, he gives up runs but doesn’t pitch a full inning.
Also, to be honest it wouldn’t REALLY prove that K-Rod is better than other people at that sort of thing without some other closers also being looked at. If I wanted to take, say K-Rod and Mariano Rivera 2005-2008, would you be willing to look at Joe Nathan and Trevor Hoffman over the same time period?
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Sep 7, 2008 8:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i agree with those two things
you’d have to compare KRod to other closers and you should include partial innings on the road. i mostly wanted to ignore situations where KRod came into innings with runners already on base and some outs already made. i guess we could define them as appearances where he comes in at the beginning of the ninth inning (home or away half).
and, honestly, looking at that wouldn’t be very conclusive, as any appearance of pitching to the score could certainly be a product of look, even over multiple seasons. i’d want to know what sort of variability we’re looking for before starting such a huge project.
by Sky Kalkman on
Sep 7, 2008 9:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd think at least initially we'd be looking at a couple of things-
First, does K-Rod (as closer) pitch differently in situations where one run doesn’t make a difference? You’d have to look at runs scored in close games (tied or 1 run lead) vs games where one run doesn’t make a difference. You’d also want a ratio of <=1-run games played in vs >1-run games played in, braking each one down by year.
Then you look at other closers the same way, to see if any pattern that emerges from K-Rod’s stats is consistently held by other elite closers (if so, it could mean they all adjust similarly, or that it’s something closers don’t control at all).
Essentially, if we find that A) K-Rod tends to surrender runs less frequently in 1-run games than other games, and B) that other elite closers do NOT share this trait (or at least that K-Rod is clearly better at it), then I think you have at least an argument in K-Rod’s favor. Otherwise, at the very least it’s inconclusive, if not demonstratively false.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Sep 8, 2008 12:35 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs











BtB on Facebook
BtB_Sky on Twitter



