Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Todd Haley Is The Steelers Next Offensive Coordinator

Bill James and the Cy Young Awards

Yesterday I decided to begin reading a few more of the essays in The Neyer/James Guide to Pitchers (I would highly recommend any book by either to anyone who even mildly likes baseball) so after I got through the Bob Friend and injury pieces I ran across one entitle "E=M CY Squared." (Page 467) Amazingly the piece is quite timely since one of the hot topics right now is the Cy Young races, and in this article, by Bill James, he created a formula that is about 80% accurate in predicting the Cy Young winners and does a nice job picking the top three overall.

Naturally I decided this could be worth replicating on site. If nothing else we have an 80% chance at nailing them. To begin here's the formula, per James:

Wins multiplied by six, then minus losses times two, then add strikeouts divided by 12, then add saves times 2.5, then add shutouts, then add runs saved versus a pitcher with a 5 ERA, then add 12 points for a first place team.

For runs saved I took the ERA, divided it by nine, then times it by the innings that pitcher pitched. I am assuming this is correct and there is no pre-set measure on innings for the 5.00 ERA pitcher. As for my sample group I simply went to THT and took the pitchers with 10 or more wins from each of the leagues (with one very special exception). Since simply giving the top three isn't fun I will provide the top five and then post the entire list at the conclusion of this article.

 

Star-divide

First up, due to alphabetical order and such, the American League.

Pitcher Team Points
Lee  CLE  205
Halladay  TOR  162
Matsuzaka  BOS  158
Lester  BOS  147
Santana  LAA  146

This probably is not too much of a surprise. Lee runs away with the award due to his wins and runs saved. Lee is having an incredible season in every regard. Even if most of his success has come against weaker foes I’m not sure you can discredit his victory. After all Lee’s tRA is almost a half run better than Halladay; 2.86 to 3.35. What’s amazing is that Lee was offered this past off-season for Delmon Young yet the Rays passed. There’s no guarantee he repeats this performance on any other team but talk about a diversity in seasons between those two.

The first place team bump puts Matsuzaka far too close to Halladay despite Halladay being the supreme pitcher in every regard except losses. That is perhaps the trickiest part about this. James knows and takes into account the mainstream voter’s mindset. The award is not truly about who is the best pitcher, otherwise win-loss records would obviously be the first thing discarded. To the voters Matsuzaka is a good pitcher, but to the more informed, he is okay, but not even a top 20 American League starter.

Onto the National League…

Pitcher Team Points
Lincecum  SF  176
Webb  ARI  160
Sabathia MIL  152
Dempster  CHN  146
Santana  NYN  146

As is the case in the A.L. neither league has a pitcher on a first place team in the top two spots. Lincecum is incredible however that shutout was not the cake but rather the sprinkles. His strikeout numbers are beyond amazing and on an awful team, going 17-3 is quite the accomplishment.

Then there is Brandon Webb. His team has a legitimate shot at the playoffs which would help his case, yet even if the Diamondbacks were in first he would need to make up four points on Lincecum somehow. Perhaps winning out with Lincecum losing out and not striking anyone out would help. Of course relying on Lincecum to fail all but seals Webb as the runner up this year, but I hear Bruce Bochy wants to ensure that this will not be a problem in the future.

Now, Sabathia. With his N.L stats Sabathia finished with 102 points, blame only nine wins – despite the limited playing time – for that. I had a bit of a debate with someone when discussing whether I should include his Indians stats as well and we were split. He argued that voters should only talk about what he did in the N.L. due to the league specific award, I argue that you simply cannot ignore half of his season. Since I am the one writing this I included them. Whether the writers will or will not consider his Indians half is irrelevant to me.

The rest: American League

Pitcher Team Points
Lee  CLE  205
Halladay  TOR  162
Matsuzaka  BOS  158
Lester  BOS  147
Santana  LAA  146
Burnett  TOR  124
Mussina  NYA  123
Saunders  LAA  123
Floyd  CHA  123
Shields  TB  122
Lackey  LAA  110
Buehrle  CHA  104
Danks  CHA  101
Kazmir  TB  100
Garza  TB  99
Garland  LAA  98
Sonnanstine  TB  96
Galarraga  DET  95
Beckett  BOS  95
Vazquez  CHA  93
Duchscherer  OAK  92
Greinke  KC  87
Slowey  MIN  86
Weaver  LAA  83
Litsch  TOR  80
Perkins  MIN  80
Padilla  TEX  79
Guthrie  BAL  78
Jackson  TB  77
Meche  KC  76
Pettitte  NYA  75
Blackburn  MIN  72
Verlander  DET  45
Hernandez  MIN  41

The rest: National League

Pitcher Team Points
Lincecum  SF  176
Webb  ARI  160
Sabathia MIL  152
Dempster  CHN  146
Santana  NYN  146
Billingsley  LAN  140
Volquez  CIN  138
Zambrano  CHN  130
Hamels  PHI  122
Sheets  MIL  122
Haren  ARI  118
Oswalt  HOU  117
Lilly  CHN  117
Nolasco  FLA  116
Lowe  LAN  112
Cook  COL  109
Moyer  PHI  106
Lohse  STL  100
Jurrjens  ATL  98
Wellemeyer  STL  94
Pelfrey  NYN  93
Hudson  ATL  89
Arroyo  CIN  83
Maine  NYN  79
Perez  NYN  78
Looper  STL  76
Johnson  ARI  71
Myers  PHI  71
Moehler  HOU  69
Parra  MIL  69
Jimenez  COL  65
Marquis  CHN  62
Redding  WAS  61
Suppan  MIL  52
Kendrick  PHI  46

References

The Hardball Times stats database

The Neyer/James Guide to Pitchers (buy it!) page 467.

StatCorner

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I am cautiously optimistic for Timmy. The final vote will seem to prove if September really is what the voter’s focus on or not.

"Ice is made for two things: injuries and my drinks." The Lincecums

by igotnothing on Sep 16, 2008 2:02 PM EDT reply actions  

standings on ESPN

ESPN keeps track of this too:

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/features/cy

Your list seems to be missing the relievers, but I’m not sure about the details of ESPN’s calculations.

by Trey Hillman's Chin on Sep 16, 2008 2:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Sure thing,

The other thing I noticed that they’re doing something funky with the 12 point bonus. It seems that the Angels’ pitchers get the full bonus, presumably because they’ve clinched 1st place. The Cubs’ pitchers get the full 12, but I don’t think they have even clinched (at least) the wildcard (am I wrong here?). Other contending teams seem to get between 5 and 7 points. Presumably these will all be 0 or 12 in the end.

Also, for the runs saved vs. 5.00 ERA pitcher, they use ((5-ERA)*IP/9) which I think is the same thing you described.

As for the leaving out the relievers, I think I like your list better. I think the 2.5 weight of the save is a bit high. There are way too many closers on all of those lists on ESPN’s site. Does James say anything about that? I wonder what the accuracy would be if you simply ignored saves and conceded the error in years where a closer wins. Since 1990, a closer has only won once in each league.

by Trey Hillman's Chin on Sep 16, 2008 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

From what I can recall looking at his lists in the book

I didn’t remember seeing any closers listed. I’d have to check later later though, perhaps Gagne?

The bonus is supposed to be only for first place teams from my understanding. I assume that does not include the wild card because that team is obviously in second in their division. I don’t really know what they’re doing with the Cubs points. That’s odd.

The ERA formula would work out equal, I just got the runs amount and subtracted the allowed total by the pitcher. Their formula is less work, but I wanted the numbers for comparison sake.

I don’t particularly see any closer being good enough to win Cy Young, although I likely should’ve included them anyways, but oh well.

by R.J. Anderson on Sep 16, 2008 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

KRod's high save total could certainly make a big difference in voting

he’s second over at ESPN, closer to Cliff Lee than Roy Halladay. and that’s my guess how the voting turns out (not how i would vote, though):

Lee
KRod
Halladay

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Sep 17, 2008 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Free Agent Compensation
Img_0001_small
Value of Various Plate Approaches
Strike_three2_small
Effect of Foul Area on Strikeouts: AL 1954-68: Erratum
Small
Baseball on a stick
Small
Player Evaluating Statistic
Baseball_small
Rays Outfield: Cheap but Extremely Productive
Small
A new xBABIP
Small
Jack Morris "pitching to the score"
Strike_three2_small
Foul Area and Differences in SO: AL vs NL
Baseball_small
Is there a Kuroda and Oswalt Alternative?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!

SaberGraphics

MLB Daily Dish

Get the latest MLB Trade Rumors, Transactions, and News at MLB Daily Dish!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Columnists:

Adam_small adarowski

Dme_small Satchel Price

Closeup4_small J-Doug

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

Featuring:

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

12475953_small Jacob Peterson

Picture-6_small Chris St. John

Btbpro_small Dave Gershman

229331_10150183361996591_674441590_6760167_6637860_n3_small Lewie Pollis

Img_3830_small David Fung