Beyond the Box Score: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Kevin Duckworth, Dead, at 44 Bar-right-arrows



Why The Indians Shouldn't Trade CC Sabathia

 

Are the Indians far enough out of the race to consider trading Sabathia? Dealing their top pitcher might bring an attractive package in a trade, but it would be the equivalent of raising a white flag high above Progressive Field in Cleveland. And, if the offseason trade of Johan Santana is any indication, Sabathia’s value on the trade market may actually be relatively low.

Star-divide

The Indians currently sit six and a half games out of first place, with a 32-36 record. The season has been disappointing for Tribe fans who held high expectations after taking the Boston Red Sox to seven games in last season's American League Championship Series. Despite their performance thus far, the Indians still should not trade Sabathia unless they are absolutely bowled over by an offer.

Since his poor start, CC Sabathia has been nothing short of dominating. After his fourth start of the season on April 16, Sabathia sported a 13.50 ERA, and certainly looking nothing like the defending Cy Young award winner. In fact I even wondered in this space if CC was hurt. However, since that point, Sabathia has thrown 72 innings, giving up 63 hits and only 17 runs, good for a 2.13 ERA. Sabathia has also compiled a 73/14 K/BB ratio in that span. After giving up five homers in his first 18 innings pitched, Sabathia has surrendered only five additional homers over his next 72 innings. In short, Sabathia appears to be pitching as well now as he ever has in his career.

Thus, the demand for CC’s services on the trade market should be high. What team can’t use a lefty who’s a legitimate ace?

 

A similar situation occurred this offseason, when the Twins dealt Johan Santana to the Mets. The Twins received a mediocre package for Santana, spearheaded by Carlos Gomez. While Gomez is no slouch, the Twins still did not receive a tremendous amount of talent in return for their ace lefty. This situation was different than the Indians’s situation with Sabathia for two reasons: first of all, the Mets had the rights to Santana for an entire season before his impending free agency, whereas whichever team acquires Sabathia would only have him for two or three months. Secondly, Santana had a more extensive and somewhat more dominating track record than Sabathia. And yet, the Twins were not even able to extract the Mets’s top prospect, Fernando Martinez, in the deal. Thus, what does it say about Sabathia’s trade value?

It is unlikely that the Indians will receive the type of package that they received in 2002 when they traded Bartolo Colon (the Montreal Expos ponied up Brandon Phillips, Cliff Lee, and Grady Sizemore in order to land Colon). While many teams would love to acquire Sabathia and several even have the means to re-sign him at the end of the season, it is unlikely that these teams would be willing to give up enough talent to make dealing Sabathia worthwhile for the Indians. 

The Indians, unlike the Twins before the season, still have reason to believe that they can make the playoffs this season, despite their lackluster performance thus far. As I have demonstrated in this space, Indians hitters have been very unlucky on balls in play this season – this luck should regress during the rest of the season. Furthermore, the team has been better than their record indicates. Judging by runs scored and runs allowed, the Indians should have a record of 35-32. Going forward, the Indians’s record should improve simply due to regression to the mean. This team can still win 85-90 games, which, in the AL Central, may very well be enough to make the playoffs.

Furthermore, should Sabathia sign with another team at the end of the season, the Indians are not left high and dry: they will receive two draft picks as compensation. While this may seem like little compensation in the short-term, it would give the Indians three of the first 35 or so picks in next year’s draft and would go a long way in helping to re-stock the farm system. 

Certainly Mark Shapiro would be remiss not to do his due diligence to see what kind of offers would be on the table for the big lefty. If the Dodgers dangled Matt Kemp and/or Andy LaRoche, for instance, or if the Angels were willing to talk about Howie Kendrick or Nick Adenhart, or if the Red Sox were to consider parting with Clay Buchholz or Jon Lester, Shapiro would have to take the offer into serious consideration. However, given what the Twins received for Johan Santana, it’s unlikely that any of these caliber of players would be offered in a deal for Sabathia. If this is the case, Shapiro is best served to let the season play out, and attempt to add another bat to the lineup in an effort to give the Indians the best opportunity possible to make it back to the postseason. The Indians are better than they have shown so far, and should be able to make a serious push for a spot in the postseason.

As long as they have CC Sabathia pitching every five days.

0 recs | Comment 2 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

There has been a lot of good discussion of this question over at Let’s Go Tribe and I’m sure there will be much more in the coming weeks. I think the argument in favor of holding out for compensation picks is weak and losing ground by the day.

First, the Indians situation is increasingly dire. They are only 6.5 games out, but they’ve lost one starting pitcher for the season (and beyond – Jake Westbrook), another pitcher’s rehab just suffered a setback which will probably keep him out for another 4 weeks (Fausto Carmona), Travis Hafner just paid a visit to James Andrews after a setback in his rehab, Victor Martinez is out for 6-8 weeks, and 2B/depth option Josh Barfield is also on the shelf for 6-8 weeks. No matter how you conceptualize it, this is an undermanned team that is not likely to meet its preseason performance expectations for the next 4-6 weeks. Those 4-6 weeks are obviously critical for determining the fate of this season and don’t bode well for Cleveland, even in the anemic looking AL Central.

The second issue is the short-term 2009-2010 future of the team. Most of Cleveland’s major-league talent (Sabathia and Byrd excluded) is locked in until 2011 or 2012. There’s no reason to think this shouldn’t be a very good team in that time period. And yet this season has exposed obvious holes in the corner outfield spots, 3B, 2B, and 1B. Not all of these holes are equal, but they are all areas which could be substantially improved upon over the next few years. Unfortunately, while the Indians have great minor league pitching depth, the organization does not have much position player talent in the upper minors. Only a handful of guys at AA & AAA look like significant future contributors (Wes Hodges, Jordan Brown, Chris Gimenez), and their timelines are uncertain.

The advantage of trading Sabathia this season is that it brings the possibility of adding young talent which can contribute within 2-3 years. It is doubtful two compensatory picks in the 2009 draft would contribute anything offensively before 2012 at the earliest. That runs the risk of missing the peak “core” of the current team, which would be a serious mistake.

I think the Indians are one bad week from being in a position where trading Sabathia would appear the obvious and correct choice (last night’s 10-2 loss to the Rocks was a good/bad start to this).

by APV on Jun 18, 2008 1:21 PM EDT   0 recs

A Couple Issues

First, there are only rumors that the Twins could have gotten more. Thus, concluding that they settled on Gomez over Martinez is to assert that the Twins wanted Martinez instead of Gomez.

Second, the draft picks are not as valuable to the Indians as they would be another organization. The reason being, the Indians are still limited by the amount they spend. This can be seen by the ‘bargain’ picks the Indians have made with their first and early round selections. While they have been successful, two first round picks for the Yankees is worth more then two first round picks for the Indians. At least on paper early on. Developmentally this may vary.

I had been, and still am, pro-trade Sabathia. I do, however, think Shapiro should be more pro-active then re-active. That is, he should be putting together packages to teams rather then waiting for the teams to come to him. Offering a couple packages to a team like the Rays may open the eyes of a team that is not normally a buyer.

by bbdbrandon on Jun 20, 2008 3:04 PM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Major League Baseball.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Bearbonds_small
Giants: 100+ innings without a home run
Avatar_small
Collecting Pitch F/X data
Thefantasysportsforum_logo_small
All-Star Snubs & Flubs
Dsc00073_small
Pitches Towards Outs
Chop_small
Talk About a Tough Luck Loss
Small
The Real Town Hall
Small
Just Watch the Game
Nolan30ryan_small
Who is MLB's Model Franchise?
Dsc00073_small
RLOB, OPS and RS
Small
Chicago Cubs music CD question

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Maddonbearlo3_small R.J. Anderson

Pronk_small Peter Bendix

Editors

Small Dan Turkenkopf

ad

Site Meter