What's wrong with CC Sabathia?
Through four starts, the reigning AL Cy Young winner sports a 13.50 ERA. He has walked 14 and struck out 14 in 18 innings. Last season, in 241 regular season innings, Sabathia walked only 37. The season before, he walked 44 (in 192 innings). So what’s wrong?
According to pitch f/x data, Sabathia’s velocity is fine: although in one start he was throwing 92-93, in his other starts his fastball regularly clocks in between 94-96 MPH, and he appears to maintain his velocity throughout the games (granted, he hasn’t lasted very long in any start, but he has thrown a lot of pitches). A drop in velocity would be a huge red flag signifying a potential injury; however, his velocity seems to be fine.
Additionally, Sabathia’s stuff seems to be okay – at least on the surface – as evidenced by his 14 strikeouts in 18 innings (seven Ks per nine innings). Last year, he struck out 7.80 hitters per nine, and the season before he Ked 8.06. Yes, his strikeout rate this year is a little lower than the previous two seasons, but this can possibly be attributed to a small sample size – if Sabathia struck out one more hitter this year, his K rate would jump to 7.5 per nine. His strikeout rate is key to watch going forward: if it does not regress towards the level he established during his previous two seasons, it could be a sign of decreased “stuff,” which could go hand-in-hand with an injury.
Sabathia’s batting average on balls in play (BABIP) is an abysmal .415. His strand-percentage is an atrocious 50%. He has also given up a lot of homers per fly: 20% of all fly balls he’s allowed have become homers (as opposed to 8.6% last year and 9.8% the tear before). All of these numbers are much, much worse than any previously established level. But are they simply aberrations, or side effects demonstrating that Sabathia has been a different pitcher this year?
Sabathia’s biggest problem this year is his inability to throw as many strikes as in the past two years. In 2005, Sabathia threw 69% of his pitches for strikes; he followed this up by throwing 66% of his pitches for strikes in 2006. This year, however, he’s only throwing 63% of his pitches for strikes.
Additionally, Sabathia is inducing fewer swings-and-misses this year than he has in the past. So far this year, batters have swung at missed at Sabathia’s pitches 14% of the time. Last year, they swung and missed at 18% of all pitches; the year before it was 17%. Along these same lines, Sabathia is relying on called third strikes for his strikeouts: this year, 36% of his strikeouts have been called third strikes; last year it was 23%, the year before it was 20%.
Sabathia has also given up a lot of hits on 0-2 counts. He has gotten as many 0-2 counts as in previous years (24% of all at-bats have had an 0-2 count this year, compared to 21% last year and 23% the year before). However, last season, batters got a hit on an 0-2 count 14% of the time. The year before it was 7% of the time. This year batters have gotten a hit on an 0-2 count a whopping 31% of the time.
But perhaps the most interesting thing about Sabathia this year is his pitch selection. This wonderful blog by Josh Kalk keeps track of pitch f/x data for pitchers. As you can see, last season Sabathia threw a fastball or sinker 61% of the time, a changeup 17% of the time, and a slider 22% of the time. And in his first start, against the White Sox, these trends continued: CC threw 68% fastballs, 11% changeups, and 21% sliders. Yes, he threw fewer changeups than normal, but I don’t think that’s of much importance. The key here is that he threw approximately the same amount of sliders. And he also induced 14 swings-and-misses.
This trend continued in his third start, also against
In his most recent start against
In summary: Sabathia’s velocity appears to be fine. However, he is throwing fewer strikes. Of the strikes he is throwing, fewer are swing-and-miss strikes, but rather called strikes instead. In the one start this season in which he induced a lot of swings-and-misses, he threw his slider the same amount as last season. In the following three starts, he induced a total of 10 swings-and-misses, and he threw 10% fewer sliders (and 34% of these sliders were thrown to only one hitter, Daric Barton). His line-drive percentage is up and he is giving up more homers per fly ball – in other words, batters are hitting him very hard.
In his own words, his problem is “not mechanical. My velocity is fine. I just can't command both sides of the plate.” ESPN’s Keith Law agreed, saying in a recent chat: “His fastball command is in the toilet. Last night he couldn't come across to his glove side with his fastball unless he forced it all the way in behind a right-handed hitter. When he threw a FB for a strike, it was practically on a tee.”
If the problem is indeed command – especially with his fastball – why is he throwing a disproportionate amount of fastballs? This year, 67% of all of his pitches are fastballs, as compared to 61% last year. He’s also throwing a few more changeups – 19% this year as compared to 17% last year. Sabathia has simply stopped throwing his slider as often: he has thrown only 14% sliders (and if you remove the first start of the season, Sabathia has thrown only 12% sliders).
As much as I hate to say it, there is one potential answer to this question. Let’s say you’re CC Sabathia, pitching in the last year before you are set to earn a bagillion dollars on the free agent market. Perhaps last season, perhaps in spring training, or perhaps in your first start of the season against the White Sox, you feel something strange in your arm or shoulder. Maybe it’s tingling. Maybe it’s pain. Maybe it’s just uncomfortable. But no matter what it is, you only feel it (or it’s exacerbated) when you throw an off-speed pitch. Like a slider. What do you do?
You stop throwing as many sliders. And other teams sit on your fastball. And if you can’t command the fastball (which may or may not have to do with that strange feeling in your arm), you walk guys and get hit hard.
Now, I’m not saying CC Sabathia is hurt. It’s quite possible that he is simply experiencing bad luck. It’s quite possible that he’s lost his confidence in his slider and just doesn’t want to throw it.
But CC Sabathia has an extensive track record. Over the last two seasons, he was almost the exact same pitcher. Even in 2005 he was very similar to his 2006 and 2007 self. Yet after throwing 256 innings last year between the regular season and playoffs, Sabathia is suddenly throwing fewer strikes, inducing fewer swings-and-misses, giving up more hits on 0-2 counts, giving up harder hit balls and more homers per fly balls, and throwing his slider noticeably less than last season.
Certainly makes you wonder.
1 recs |
8 comments
Comments
Great article
My feelings exactly. His control has been terribly off in his first few starts…this can indicate an issue at the elbow or forearm… I linked up to your article and expanded some based on the anatomy of the pitching elbow. Great job bringing together all the pitch f/x data from Kalk’s blog.
by DisabledListInformer on Apr 18, 2008 11:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
But wouldn’t it be just as likely if not more that the reason he is throwing more fastballs after that first start is that he realizes his command of the pitch has slipped and he is trying to work through it, because he knows it is vital to his overall performance for the season?
He may have an injury that is encouraging him not to throw the slider, or he may be trying to regain the command of his fastball by throwing more fastballs until he regains that command. The fastball often “sets up” the slider and gives the slider its effectiveness.
by hans on Apr 19, 2008 11:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
good point hans
Yes, this is true…his fastball is vital and could be a reason why he was trying to throw more of them – to get back on track. But at the same time, Sabathia is an experienced pitcher, and he knows just as well as anyone that if you go out and throw that many fastballs, hitters are just going to sit back and tee off!
by DisabledListInformer on Apr 19, 2008 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
k rate
If you calculate the K-rate per batter faced, his k-rate is way down this season. I’ve always thought it was a mistake to calculate k-rate per innings pitched.
by DenverBears on Apr 20, 2008 6:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
True, but...
If you calculate K rate per batter faced, you could run in to issues such as a pitcher’s BABIP skewing his K rate (especially in the case of Sabathia so far, whose BABIP is unusually high). Since an inordinate amount of balls in play are becoming hits, Sabathia is facing more hitters, and thus his K rate per hitter looks lower than it otherwise might.
by Peter Bendix on Apr 20, 2008 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure I agree...
if he is K-ing hitters with the same efficiency as normal, it shouldn’t matter whether his BABIP is high or low, whereas his BABIP would affect his K per IP. Put another way, his K per batter faced would not change if he gave up a hit to every batter that made contact (BABIP = 1.000), whereas his K/IP would become 3.00 or K/9 = 27, since all outs are by K.
by DenverBears on Apr 21, 2008 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
rebuttal
With poor results through three starts, it shouldn’t surprise anyone that there’s a suggestion that Sabathia is hurt; in one unfounded rumor, Sabathia isn’t throwing sliders due to a UCL problem. Not only is this wrong, it’s factually incorrect. I asked a doctor I trust about the idea that Sabathia’s pitch selection has anything to do with the health of his arm. He explained the structure of the arm to me saying, “the flexor pollicis longus originates on the radius, unlike the other major ligaments that originate on the ulna. Origins are proximal (closer to the body) and attachments are distal (further from the body). The UCL originates on the medial condyle of the humerus and attaches to the coronoid process. Comparing origins and attachments is like comparing apples to oranges. All these muscles have in common are their actions (flexing) and the fact that they originate at or near the elbow. There’s no medical or functional reason that a slider would be more or less affected by this than a fastball.” In fact, the stress of a slider is less on the important are of concern here, Sabathia’s middle finger, than it would be on a fastball. Moreover, a 1987 study by Dr. Frank Jobe and a team of biomechanists showed that there is not a significant difference between the flexor-pronator muscular forces used in a fastball and a curveball. This matches with Dr. Glenn Fleisig’s < a href=http://ajs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/34/3/423?rss=1>2005 study that showed there were not significant differences in kinematics for fastballs, changeups, and breaking balls, including the slider.
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=7400
in their respective baseball purgatories, both frank thomas and jerry owens loudly whine.
by larry on Apr 21, 2008 12:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
rebuttal
I can only assume that Carroll is talking about my article about Sabathia. I would like a chance to clarify:
I never said he had a UCL problem. This is what I said:
I am not saying that Sabathia is hurting, or that he has a torn UCL. What I am saying is that there is a reason for him not throwing sliders, and that this could be a potential reason.
I was simply playing devil’s advocate here. I was never stating that he definitely had involvement of his UCL.
In regards to anatomy:
Although the Flexor Pollicis Longus does originate on the radius, it also arises from the adjacent part of the interosseous membrane of the forearm. In many cases, the FPL has another slender origin via a fleshy slip from the medial border of the coronoid process of the ulna, or from the medial epicondyle of the humerus. So I am correct in my anatomy.
The research presented is interesting, but the ‘05 article actually stated that “results for the slider were inconclusive because of small sample size”.
The article also stated that there were significant kinematic differences, but what were they? What are the implications there? They apparently measured 26 kinematic measures, just wondering what they were.
Also, just because a study is deemed statistically insignificant by research measures, doesn’t mean that there is no relationship at all. Plus, the ‘87 study did not include the Flexor Pollicis Longus or the Flexor Digitorum Profundus (just saying).
Also, the research sample sizes were quite small in both studies (21 individuals in the ‘05 study, only 8 in the ‘87 study)...can you really draw a scientific conclusion through a set of 8 people?
All this being said, Carroll brings up excellent points. I believe he was taking my article as me coming out saying, “this is what he has.” That is not what I was doing at all. I was merely starting conversation, keeping people’s interest, getting people to think at a more critical level – and this was a success.
Carroll’s site is great, and his articles are always well-written. I have enjoyed reading his content immensely.
I also love the fact that we can discuss baseball in such a professional, yet understandable manner.
by DisabledListInformer on Apr 21, 2008 10:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 













BtB on Facebook














