Beyond the Box Score: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Yankees sign Mark Teixeira; Billy Beane Rejoices

Maybe the Yankees read Beyond the Boxscore after all.

In the space we have been lamenting the Yanks’ seeming lack of interest in Mark Teixeira, a player who would immediately improve their offense and defense and is likely to age gracefully. And today comes word that Teixeira will sign an 8-year contract with the Yankees. As such, it’s now fair to say that this has been a good offseason for Brian Cashman.

With Teixeira in tow, the Yankees offense becomes formidable once again, rather than league average. Teixeira instantly improves their infield defense, and allows Nick Swisher to move to the outfield, thus improving the outfield defense too (assuming he’s not in center). The Yankees now can rotate Swisher, Hideki Matsui, Xavier Nady and Johnny Damon between DH and the two corner outfield spots, leaving Melky Cabrera (or Mike Cameron) in center, and thus improving the defense even further.

This is perfect for the Yankees: Nady is best deployed in part-time action, against all lefties and maybe a few righties. Matsui can avoid lefties (not that he’s particularly bad against them anyway), and both he and Damon are significant injury risks. Swisher should rebound from an awful 2008 and can man any outfield position.

The situation gets a bit murkier if it turns out that Jorge Posada can’t be a full-time catcher, but even if that’s the case, Posada can DH some of the time, benching someone like Matsui. The Yankees can try to trade any of these players, but they have no pressing needs and may better off keeping them in case of injury.

While it appears that the Yankees stole Teixeira from the clutches of the Red Sox, the big losers in this situation are the Angels.

Star-divide

While losing Francisco Rodriguez is of relatively little importance to them, losing Teixeira is a huge blow. Their offense was below-average last year and lacks upside once again in 2009, and downgrading from Teixeira to Kendry Morales would be a huge loss. There is still time for the Angels to improve their team, but simply signing Brian Fuentes isn’t the answer. We’re talking about an Angels team whose third-order Pythagorean record was 84-78, and who just lost Mark Teixeira and Francisco Rodriguez. Somewhere, Billy Beane (and Jon Daniels) is smiling.

This is, of course, a big upgrade for the Yankees, but it doesn’t guarantee anything. Last season, the Yankees finished with 91 third-order wins, behind the Blue Jays (92), Rays (97) and Red Sox (102). While the Yankees have undoubtedly improved themselves, they can’t be assured of a playoff spot, let alone a division title. The Rays and Red Sox should once again be very competitive, and while the Yankees signings may have closed the gap it also probably hasn’t created much of a gap between the Yanks and their competitors, either.

The AL East should once again be a dogfight – it’s very possible that this division will contain the three best teams in baseball. The Yankees may be the slight favorites, but at this point the division is way too close to call. Should make for a fun season.

0 recs  |  Comment 18 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Don't forget

Angels also (probably) lost Jon Garland and Garret Anderson, neither of whom was exceptional but between them worth something like 6 or 7 WARP.

Saving countless runs with my defense.

by Sam Miller OCR on Dec 23, 2008 6:48 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

No way they mattered that much.

If you’re referencing BPro’s WARP, they set the replacement-level WAY low. Real replacement-level players are in the 2 to 2.5 WARP range, meaning they really only lost 2-3 wins from those guys.

On a REAL scale, Anderson is a .5 to 1 WAR player and Garland’s in the 1 to 1.5 range.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Dec 23, 2008 6:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Anderson

You mean -0.5 to -1 WAR player, right? :)

Webmaster of Driveline Mechanics
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An Unconventional Look at Scouting

by Kyle Boddy on Dec 23, 2008 7:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pardon the question

but how is a replacement level player in the 2-2.5 “Wins Above Replacement Player” range? Wouldn’t they by definition of 0.0?

by Adam Peterson on Dec 23, 2008 7:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

They SHOULD be.

That’s the problem with the stat – they’ve defined replacement level too low.

---
Juuuust a bit outside!!
http://www.rightfieldbleachers.com

by Jack Moore on Dec 23, 2008 8:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yup.

WARP’s replacement-level team wins something like 15% of its games (don’t quote me on that exact number), or something like 25 wins. That’s WAY worse than you’ll ever see any MLB team, because the quality of players on a 25 win true talent team really belong on a mediocre to bad AAA team. Guys who are actually replacement-level (minimum wage veteran free agents and high-end AAA non-prospects) would rate at about 2 WARP. It’s one big mistake of WARP to set the replacement-level so low (it’s actually caused by assuming replacement-level players are both crappy hitters AND crappy fielders while in reality they are league-average fielders). The other is not using a decent fielding metric. BPro has plans to fix both issues.

A better estimate of a replacement-level team is a 30% winning percentage or 48 wins.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Dec 24, 2008 8:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So you’re saying that Garland was a low-K, high flyball pitcher who greatly benefited from the defense behind him and Anderson was a marginal player because his defense was bad?

I think not… makes too much sense

Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all.

by baetown415 on Dec 23, 2008 9:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The love for GA surprises me more than Garland, who has decent value over a really crappy starter.

But GA had a .325 OBP last year with a .433 SLG. That’s league-average. But he plays a corner outfield spot (easy to do) and he does it poorly. 2008 wasn’t a fluke, either. He had remarkably similar offensive years in 2006 and 2005. 2007 was slightly better, mostly due to a .490 SLG. He’ll be 37 next year.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Dec 24, 2008 8:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Forget Teixeira, Morales is really replacing Kotchman

The Angels’ offense will hinge on production from unproven, high-potential kids. Kendry Morales, Brandon Wood, and Erick Aybar should be capable ML-caliber players to start the season…whether they can go from .650 to .800 OPS’s probably determines the fate of the season.

As you might recall, the Angels were just fine with Casey Kotchman at first base before they signed Teixeira. Expect the same in ’09.

http://inplaynoouts.blogspot.com/ - A blog about teams I like, written by me.

by Carl Johnson on Dec 23, 2008 8:39 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The problem with that is that they were lucky to be fine before Tex arrived.

Their clutch hitting is unsustainable and will eventually catch up to them.

---
Juuuust a bit outside!!
http://www.rightfieldbleachers.com

by Jack Moore on Dec 23, 2008 10:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Their hitting has been unsustainable for years now.

They beat out their pythag every season. Nothing leads me to believe they’re not going to continue doing that. Scioscia loves one-run games.

http://inplaynoouts.blogspot.com/ - A blog about teams I like, written by me.

by Carl Johnson on Dec 23, 2008 10:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As I wrote about

here, the Angels clutch hitting is not consistent. They were exceptionally clutch this year, yes, but in 2007 they were 28th in baseball in OPS with men on base. In 2006 they were 5th, in 2005 they were 24th.

Almost like it randomly fluctuates year to year.

by Peter Bendix on Dec 23, 2008 11:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Or Bret Saberhagen is somehow involved.

I guess it would be reverse Saberhagen though, right?

by Dan Turkenkopf on Dec 25, 2008 3:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The big reason for that is their baserunning.

Another is a top-heavy bullpen, more top-heavy than most teams.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Dec 24, 2008 8:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

baserunning

gotta wonder if we’re missing out on it.

by Daniel Berlyn on Dec 24, 2008 1:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Do you mean we're not paying enough attention to it?

If so, I totally agree. It’s only really a +/-5 runs effect at max, but it adds up for teams. BPro has a really good baserunning metric. I knew it existed, but didn’t know it was available in their stat reports until recently. Expect some posts on it soon.

Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.

by Sky Kalkman on Dec 24, 2008 8:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We use numbers and stuff.
Community Guidelines
Why be a member?
Start posting on Beyond the Box Score »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
PZR-based Win Values 2001-2006

Recent FanPosts

Small
Determining Batted Ball Rates using Pitch Type and Location
Small
a new xBABIP calculator
Img587561916661595
Top 15 high school MLB draft prospects
Small
The "30 parks on a budget" challenge
Sunflower_small
World Series Simulation, Game #6
Small
JT20 Dynasty League
E52205a2_small
New Look
Sth70021_small
Exploring Hit f/x, Albeit Badly
Redcap_small
Ricky Nolasco: 4 WAR or 1 WAR?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Primer on BaseRuns
Cool Baseball Infographics
ESPN's Jerry Crasnick on defensive metrics
I’m also a follower, since Brian Bannister’s on our team, of sabermetric st...
Top Ten Baseball-Reference.com's Sponsorships
Primer on Linear Weights
JC Bradbury on "Hot Stove Myths"
Everyone Should Learn to Throw a Cutter
Criminals of WAR
Ten statisticians you should know about

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

BtB on Twitter

Main Feed: @BtBScore

Tommy B: @tommy_bennett
Sky: @BtB_Sky
Dan: @dturkenk
Harry: @harrypav
Jinaz: @jinazreds
Jack: @jh_moore
Erik: @Erik_Manning
Tommy R: @trancel
Justin: @justinbopp

Subscribe to BtB via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

BtB Goes Social


Managers

Nando_small R.J. Anderson

Limes_125_small Sky Kalkman

E52205a2_small Tommy Bennett

Editors

Face_small Harry Pavlidis

Rawlings_baseball_bigger_small Dan Turkenkopf

770insig_small Jeff Zimmerman (TucsonRoyal)

Aviles_small Justin Bopp

Authors

Banny_small erik

Raysring1_small Tommy Rancel

Jinaz-reds-avatar_small JinAZ

Jmlogo_small Jack Moore

1753738656_110919ebe9_o_small vivaelpujols

1_small Graham

Baseball_small Mike Rogers

Redcap_small SFiercex4

Small Patrick Clark

Walter_album_small Walter Fulbright