This Doesn't Even Make Sense (Pt. 2)
[Ed: The salary for Ramirez didn't come out until after this post, it's 1.8 mil for Ramirez. Ugh, why?)
Today's adventures in Kansas City involves three reliever signing.
The cheap, and potentially good signing
Doug Waecther.
The awful and unacceptable signings:
Kyle Farnsworth
---
How can a team that understands the usage of cheap bullpen parts give Farnsworth two years and more than 4 million annually? Marcels has his FIP at 4.8. That's below replacement level for relievers. He should be paying the Royals to pitch in the 60 or so innings he gets.
Update:
Originally I had Horacio as a "cheap, and potentially good signing" there's some question as to why. Here's the short list:
- Cheap (note: this obviously changed...) even if he did suck, they could ditch him with little lost costs.
- Win curve: the Royals are probably around 75-80 wins, plugging Ramirez into some non-high leverage innings probably doesn't make too much of a difference whether he's the "good" Ramirez or the "bad" Ramirez.
- Trade: last season Ramirez found success with the Royals and they dumped him for a minor leaguer. On the off chance that Ramirez has another mildly attractive first half, perhaps they can ditch him for another minor leaguer. He's unlikely to fetch anything of value, but you never know.
0 recs |
31 comments
Comments
horacio ramirez is below replacement level, too.
not sure how that qualifies as “potentially good”. maybe “potentially less bad”.
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 3:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Marcels has Horacio at 4.4 FIP?
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 11, 2008 3:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i'd forgotten how Marcels is the end all, be all.
my bad. i’ll bow down to it accordingly in the future.
seriously, it’s okay to use your head sometimes and think about this stuff instead of running over to fangraphs and quoting a single projection system. if your entire argument for justifying that signing as “potentially good” is FIP from marcels, it’s sorely lacking. i’m guessing you have more. so let’s hear it.
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 3:58 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Why don't you offer up your counter argument?
by philkid3 on Dec 11, 2008 4:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i'll simply offer up his career history
continually declining K rate, unsustainably low HR and BB rates last year helping rouge up his performance. and if the royals really do plan to put him in their rotation, they’ll get exactly what seattle got two years ago. i would have thought it’s rather obvious that one could find someone to do exactly what ramirez will do next year for 1/4 of the cost. but marcels says no so what do i know? the guy with the lifetime FIP of 4.95 is going to pull it together next year! ignore all other information and go with the rote projection system.
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 4:19 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
or someone who was previously chastised that this site was meant for serious, in depth baseball discussion finds a thin post like this rather silly.
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 5:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I apologize for not going further in depth.
I should’ve talked about the win curve, the cost involved, and the Ramirez having more “acceptable” seasons within recent years than Farnsworth.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 11, 2008 6:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
now you're cooking.
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 6:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ramirez isn't a great pitcher by any means.
Two of the past three season’s he’s been better than replacement level. One as a starter and the last as a reliever. If the Royals put him in the rotation, then they’re idiots, but as a reliever he does have a few things going for him that make him a “potentially good” signing versus Farnsworth with the main point being his price. He’s cheap, he’s being paid what he should be, that’s not good in this case, but he’s not overpaid. You can ditch him without much in lost costs, not so much on Farny.
Plus, if he flukes through the first half you can trade him for Paul Orlando or something.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 11, 2008 5:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
is that paulo orlando's american cousin?
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 5:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry. self-flagged for attempting humor.
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 5:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Believe it or not, you can comment without being a dunce.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 11, 2008 6:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
that's why i flagged it for attempting humor. i know that's a faux pas here.
no need to pile on.
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 6:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
so is calling me stupid.
but you did it using a more refined and serious word so i guess that makes it okay.
i apologize for expecting some more analysis than a regurgitation of FIP. you can do better.
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 6:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather have Farnsworth than Horacio, although I'd want neither for more than the league minimum.
Why does KC feel the need to spend money on a bullpen, anyway?
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Dec 11, 2008 5:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i wonder if their owner is just looking around the economic environment and saying "there isn't anything i want to invest in [other than his farm system - plaudits for that] so i'll spend ridiculous amounts of cash on horacio ramirez and kyle farnsworth"
at least they can’t call him cheap anymore.
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 5:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So he's the next Peter Angelos?
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Dec 11, 2008 5:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
with the farm system.
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 6:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd answer, but then I would have to delay my Farns-induced suicide
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Dec 11, 2008 11:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So, I just noticed the Ramirez price isn't the 800k I was expecting, but 1.8 million.
Why the hell?
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 11, 2008 6:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
that certainly would go a long way towards explaining this post.
i consider you less of a dunce now. or maybe more because you didn’t know the amount he was being paid. whatever. i’ll sort that out later.
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 6:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The details came out after the post, so I would say more for not waiting.
There’s no defense of Ramirez for that much.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 11, 2008 6:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
okay. i read about it before i saw your post so i had assumed you had as well.
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 6:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately not.
I’ll put the dunce hat on for trusting the Royals in making a signing.
by R.J. Anderson on Dec 11, 2008 6:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
they lost my trust with their odd moves this offseason.
their draft prowess had done much to rehabilitate them after the guillen signing. squandered.
willy taveras free?
by larry on Dec 11, 2008 6:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's nothing compared to what we paid for him two years ago
by Graham on Dec 11, 2008 6:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't feel sorry for any fanbase
that gets to enjoy Russell the Muscle AND FGut
Bury my heart at Grass Creek.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Dec 11, 2008 11:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 








BtB on Facebook

















