Grammar Rant: Less vs. Fewer
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 29, 2008 4:34 PM EST
Email
PrintUse fewer when referring to things that can be counted. Use less when referring to stuff that can't be broken down into smaller pieces. In general, people tend to misuse "less" where "fewer" should be used, but not the other way around.
Incorrect:
- Frank Thomas has stolen less bases than Jose Reyes.
Correct:
- Juan Pierre has fewer home runs than Adam Dunn.
- Juan Pierre has less power than Adam Dunn
Learn it. Love it. Use it.
17 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sky, I never took you for a
grammar Gestapo. Keep your red pen away from my site. It used to be really embarrassing to go back and find a bunch of mistakes, but now I just shrug my shoulders and tell myself at least I tried. Meh.
Amaury translates into "Punisher of Spheroids" in the lost tongue of Atlantis. Marti means "Belgian Waffle." www.futureredbirds.net
Skywriter Trailed By Skyeditor
---
Juuuust a bit outside!!
http://balkingtraditionalism.blogspot.com/
Less Grammar Posts!
;-) And don’t think you’re the only blog that has this conversation. I know we’ve had various grammar posts.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
What about the correct useage of “than and then” or “their, they’re, and there”?
“Of course this bed is of their own making, Depo didn’t have these non – performing contracts other then when Drew broke his wrist which I think is different then signing a pitcher who probably knew his shoulder was shot and had been pitching through pain for several years.”
by Dusto_Magnifico on Nov 29, 2008 8:46 PM EST reply actions
There are other grammatical problems in that paragraph, but the use of "their" is not one of them
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
this isn't going to help the rep you guys have for being humorless
nevermind the fact that the distinction you’re making is aesthetic at best.
nothing gets ‘em wetter than infrequent postings on the city’s second favorite team
There's a difference between being humorless and not funny
I’d like to think I’m at least the second. :-)
by Dan Turkenkopf on Nov 29, 2008 9:22 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Anyone who reads DRB knows I'm the latter.
I try to keep the tone here a bit more serious.
by R.J. Anderson on Nov 29, 2008 9:30 PM EST up reply actions
"the distinction you’re making is aesthetic at best."
It’s not an aesthetic distinction. That would imply that you choose one simply because one sounds better, looks nicer or is generally more appealing. This is a case of one usage being wrong and one usage being right.
Fewer vs. less is definitely a pet peeve of mine.
I try not to be too anal about this stuff. Thanks for indulging.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
Number vs. amount
I would add that the same rules apply to the use of “number” vs. “amount.”
Use “number” when you can count the quantity in question; use “amount” when you can’t count the quantity in question. Examples are below.
- Bulleted list Roy Halladay had a number of strikeouts in today’s game.
- Bulleted list Big Papi ate a large amount of food before today’s game.
by Bernie51 on Dec 1, 2008 11:05 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
Follow us on Twitter!
BTB: @BtBScore
Justin: @justinbopp
Satchel: @SatchelPrice
J-Doug: @RationalPastime
Daniel: @CamdenCrazies
Peter: @CapitolAvenue
Josh: @garik16
Julian: @splashinpumpkin
Matt: @devil_fingers
Bill: @BillPetti
JD: @JDSussman
Lucas: @DBITLefty
Jeff: @jeffwzimmerman
Lewis: @LewsOnFirst
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
