What effect on a teams run total does the ½ inning a home team doesn't play if it is ahead going into the bottom of the last inning?
Question: What effect on a teams run total does the ½ inning a home team doesn't play if it is ahead going into the bottom of the last inning?
Why I asked the question: I have wondered where why teams were off on their Pythagorean record and wondered if the ½ inning that wasn't played made any difference.
I explain the Pythagorean theorem with respect to baseball records under the article:
http://jeffsqanda.blogspot.com/2008/10/can-1-run-games-and-blowout-wins-and.html
Analysis: The number of innings that a team pitched vice the number innings that a team batted were researched and compared. The innings pitched was easy to find as it is used in every pitching statistic under the sun, but I was not able to locate the innings batted or outs record. After trying to find a list of total outs, innings batted, etc., I had to go with the following formula to determine innings batted (basically Innings = Outs/3):
Innings batted =(TPA+DP+CS-H-BB-HBP-CI)/3 + 5.3
TPA = Total plate appearances
DP = Double play (out after getting on base)
CS = Caught Stealing (again out after getting on base)
H = Hit
BB = Base on Balls
HBP = Hit by pitch
CI = Catcher interference
5.3 = When I initially took the total innings pitched minus the innings batted there was an average discrepancy of 5 1/3 innings worth of outs not accounted for. These were cases when a runner was on base but was picked off the base pitcher, thrown out stretching a single to a double, etc.
Innings pitched minus innings batted were used to get the difference from one team to the next. The number show what I expected, teams with a winning record did not have as many innings batted compared to those that didn't win as often. For example the Cubs had 18 more innings pitched than batted while the Nationals hit in 31 more innings than they pitched.
After those calculations, the runs these innings would have created was calculated. The league average of 4.5 runs per games was used. Here is the formula:
Runs difference if extra inning played = Innings/9*4.5
The positive or negative runs were added to the team's total in runs scored for the season. The teams initial Pythagorean W-L record was calculated. Then the total number of games wons that the Pythagorean was off was added together. For the non adjusted values, it was off by a total of 103 games. Finally, I took the Pythagorean value using the new runs scored value, got the sum of the difference of the new Pythagorean wins and the actual number (98) and then compared the two sums. Here is the data:
| MLB | W | L | RS | RA | W – Orig Py | L – Orig Py | Diff – Orig Py |
| Washington | 59 | 102 | 641 | 825 | 61 | 100 | 2 |
| Seattle | 61 | 101 | 671 | 811 | 66 | 96 | 5 |
| San Diego | 63 | 99 | 637 | 764 | 66 | 96 | 3 |
| Pittsburgh | 67 | 95 | 735 | 884 | 66 | 96 | 1 |
| Baltimore | 68 | 93 | 782 | 869 | 72 | 89 | 4 |
| San Francisco | 72 | 90 | 640 | 759 | 67 | 95 | 5 |
| Atlanta | 72 | 90 | 753 | 778 | 78 | 84 | 6 |
| Cincinnati | 74 | 88 | 704 | 800 | 71 | 91 | 3 |
| Detroit | 74 | 88 | 821 | 857 | 78 | 84 | 4 |
| Colorado | 74 | 88 | 747 | 822 | 73 | 89 | 1 |
| Oakland | 75 | 86 | 646 | 690 | 75 | 86 | 0 |
| Kansas City | 75 | 87 | 691 | 781 | 71 | 91 | 4 |
| Texas | 79 | 83 | 901 | 967 | 75 | 87 | 4 |
| Cleveland | 81 | 81 | 805 | 761 | 86 | 76 | 5 |
| Arizona | 82 | 80 | 720 | 706 | 83 | 79 | 1 |
| LA Dodgers | 84 | 78 | 700 | 648 | 87 | 75 | 3 |
| Florida | 84 | 77 | 770 | 767 | 81 | 80 | 3 |
| Toronto | 86 | 76 | 714 | 610 | 94 | 68 | 8 |
| Houston | 86 | 75 | 712 | 743 | 77 | 84 | 9 |
| St. Louis | 86 | 76 | 779 | 725 | 87 | 75 | 1 |
| Chicago Sox | 88 | 74 | 810 | 729 | 90 | 72 | 2 |
| Minnesota | 88 | 74 | 829 | 744 | 90 | 72 | 2 |
| NY Mets | 89 | 73 | 799 | 715 | 90 | 72 | 1 |
| NY Yankees | 89 | 73 | 789 | 727 | 88 | 74 | 1 |
| Milwaukee | 90 | 72 | 750 | 689 | 88 | 74 | 2 |
| Philadelphia | 92 | 70 | 799 | 680 | 94 | 68 | 2 |
| Boston | 95 | 67 | 845 | 694 | 97 | 65 | 2 |
| Tampa Bay | 97 | 65 | 774 | 671 | 92 | 70 | 5 |
| Chicago Cubs | 97 | 64 | 855 | 671 | 100 | 61 | 3 |
| LA Angels | 100 | 62 | 765 | 697 | 89 | 73 | 11 |
| Original Difference | 103 |
| MLB | Innings Pitched – Innings Batted | Additional runs | New RS | W – Py Adjust | L- Py Adjust | Diff – Py Adjust | Team change |
| Washington | -31 | -15.5 | 626 | 59 | 102 | 0 | 2 |
| Seattle | -23 | -11.5 | 660 | 64 | 98 | 3 | 2 |
| San Diego | -13 | -6.5 | 631 | 66 | 96 | 3 | 0 |
| Pittsburgh | -13 | -6.5 | 729 | 66 | 96 | 1 | 0 |
| Baltimore | -5 | -2.5 | 780 | 72 | 89 | 4 | 0 |
| San Francisco | -12 | -6 | 634 | 67 | 95 | 5 | 0 |
| Atlanta | -8 | -4 | 749 | 78 | 84 | 6 | 0 |
| Cincinnati | -11 | -5.5 | 699 | 70 | 92 | 4 | -1 |
| Detroit | -3 | -1.5 | 820 | 77 | 85 | 3 | 1 |
| Colorado | -8 | -4 | 743 | 73 | 89 | 1 | 0 |
| Oakland | -8 | -4 | 642 | 75 | 86 | 0 | 0 |
| Kansas City | 1 | 0.5 | 692 | 71 | 91 | 4 | 0 |
| Texas | 0 | 0 | 901 | 75 | 87 | 4 | 0 |
| Cleveland | -2 | -1 | 804 | 85 | 77 | 4 | 1 |
| Arizona | 9 | 4.5 | 725 | 83 | 79 | 1 | 0 |
| LA Dodgers | 3 | 1.5 | 702 | 87 | 75 | 3 | 0 |
| Florida | 0 | 0 | 770 | 81 | 80 | 3 | 0 |
| Toronto | 8 | 4 | 718 | 94 | 68 | 8 | 0 |
| Houston | 2 | 1 | 713 | 77 | 84 | 9 | 0 |
| St. Louis | 10 | 5 | 784 | 87 | 75 | 1 | 0 |
| Chicago Sox | 9 | 4.5 | 815 | 90 | 72 | 2 | 0 |
| Minnesota | 5 | 2.5 | 832 | 90 | 72 | 2 | 0 |
| NY Mets | 2 | 1 | 800 | 90 | 72 | 1 | 0 |
| NY Yankees | 8 | 4 | 793 | 88 | 74 | 1 | 0 |
| Milwaukee | 5 | 2.5 | 753 | 88 | 74 | 2 | 0 |
| Philadelphia | 6 | 3 | 802 | 94 | 68 | 2 | 0 |
| Boston | 17 | 8.5 | 854 | 98 | 64 | 3 | -1 |
| Tampa Bay | 18 | 9 | 783 | 93 | 69 | 4 | 1 |
| Chicago Cubs | 18 | 9 | 864 | 100 | 61 | 3 | 0 |
| LA Angels | 15 | 7.5 | 773 | 89 | 73 | 11 | 0 |
| Adjusted Difference | 98 |
The difference is 5 games, not a lot of games, but does bring a better understanding of the difference in records a little more in focus. The lost half inning, along with my explanation on Blowout and 1 runs games, help to explain the difference in Pythagorean records.
0 recs |
6 comments
Comments
Thanks for sharing.
The half-inning issue is also important for park factors.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 13, 2008 4:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Hmm... hadn't thought about that...
Might want to shorten the name of the post though…
Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 13, 2008 8:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I like both
the idea behind this fanpost, and the title. Probably has something to do with my lifelong love affair of the long-winded though.
* sarcasm might be involved in this comment
by mattyfrommo on Nov 15, 2008 2:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Never thought about Park Factors.
and yea, the title is a little out of hand.
by Jeff Zimmerman (TucsonRoyal) on Nov 13, 2008 11:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
RS/27 Outs
Aren’t you suppose to use Runs Scored per 27 outs as your pythag input(s)?
vr, Xei
by Xeifrank on Nov 19, 2008 8:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
That's certainly more accurate. But I don't think people do that, usually.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 19, 2008 8:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 










BtB on Facebook
















